Ryzen 5 3600 vs Xeon Phi 7290

AMD

Ryzen 5 3600

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.2 GHz2019

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Xeon Phi 7290

72 Cores288 Thrd245 WWMax: 1.7 GHz2016

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 5 3600

2019

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +14.9% higher average FPS across 15 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Draws 65W instead of 245W, a 180W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon Phi 7290.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (17,685 vs 17,839).
  • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Phi 7290, which brings 72 cores / 288 threads.
  • Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Xeon Phi 7290 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon Phi 7290

2016

Why buy it

  • +0.9% higher PassMark.
  • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 72 cores / 288 threads.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 3600 across 15 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • 276.9% higher power demand at 245W vs 65W.
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 3600 better than Xeon Phi 7290?
Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon Phi 7290 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 3600 is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Phi 7290 is the better fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 72 cores and 288 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 5 3600 is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 5 3600 is at an unclear MSRP at $199 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 14.9% average FPS lead across 15 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Xeon Phi 7290 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.9% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (88.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 5 3600 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2016). That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRyzen 5 3600Xeon Phi 7290
1080p
low200 FPS177 FPS
medium161 FPS143 FPS
high135 FPS113 FPS
ultra106 FPS88 FPS
1440p
low154 FPS141 FPS
medium119 FPS111 FPS
high96 FPS87 FPS
ultra75 FPS68 FPS
4K
low70 FPS66 FPS
medium58 FPS56 FPS
high46 FPS43 FPS
ultra36 FPS34 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRyzen 5 3600Xeon Phi 7290
1080p
low442 FPS136 FPS
medium404 FPS120 FPS
high332 FPS109 FPS
ultra295 FPS86 FPS
1440p
low420 FPS120 FPS
medium359 FPS108 FPS
high303 FPS97 FPS
ultra263 FPS77 FPS
4K
low297 FPS87 FPS
medium259 FPS81 FPS
high230 FPS72 FPS
ultra201 FPS56 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRyzen 5 3600Xeon Phi 7290
1080p
low442 FPS446 FPS
medium442 FPS446 FPS
high442 FPS446 FPS
ultra442 FPS446 FPS
1440p
low442 FPS446 FPS
medium442 FPS434 FPS
high442 FPS374 FPS
ultra432 FPS326 FPS
4K
low442 FPS394 FPS
medium361 FPS306 FPS
high305 FPS259 FPS
ultra242 FPS209 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRyzen 5 3600Xeon Phi 7290
1080p
low442 FPS446 FPS
medium442 FPS446 FPS
high442 FPS446 FPS
ultra442 FPS446 FPS
1440p
low442 FPS446 FPS
medium442 FPS446 FPS
high442 FPS446 FPS
ultra442 FPS420 FPS
4K
low442 FPS446 FPS
medium442 FPS405 FPS
high413 FPS361 FPS
ultra357 FPS310 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 3600 and Xeon Phi 7290

AMD

Ryzen 5 3600

The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.

Intel

Xeon Phi 7290

The Xeon Phi 7290 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Knights Landing (2016) architecture. It features 72 cores and 288 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 245 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 17,839 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 3600 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon Phi 7290 offers 72 cores / 288 threads — the Xeon Phi 7290 has 66 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 versus 1.7 GHz on the Xeon Phi 7290 — a 84.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 3600 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 1.5 GHz). The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon Phi 7290 uses Knights Landing (2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 3600 scores 17,685 against the Xeon Phi 7290's 17,839 — a 0.9% lead for the Xeon Phi 7290. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600 vs 0 kB (total) on the Xeon Phi 7290.

FeatureRyzen 5 3600Xeon Phi 7290
Cores / Threads
6 / 12
72 / 288+1100%
Boost Clock
4.2 GHz+147%
1.7 GHz
Base Clock
3.6 GHz+140%
1.5 GHz
L3 Cache
32 MB (total)
0 kB (total)
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
512 kB (per core)
Process
7 nm, 12 nm-50%
14 nm
Architecture
Matisse (2019−2020)
Knights Landing (2016)
PassMark
17,685
17,839
Cinebench R23 Multi
9,500
Geekbench 6 Single
1,295
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,898
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Phi 7290 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen 5 3600Xeon Phi 7290
Socket
AM4
LGA3647
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
24
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: Yes (Ryzen 5 3600) / not specified (Xeon Phi 7290). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400.

FeatureRyzen 5 3600Xeon Phi 7290
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
Yes
Target Use
Gaming/Budget Workstation