
Ryzen 5 3600
Popular choices:

Xeon W-1270P
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon W-1270P.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (17,685 vs 17,961).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-1270P, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Xeon W-1270P mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon W-1270P
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Xeon W-1270P
2020Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon W-1270P.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (17,685 vs 17,961).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-1270P, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Xeon W-1270P mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon W-1270P better than Ryzen 5 3600?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon W-1270P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 290 FPS |
| medium | 161 FPS | 255 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 214 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 184 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 154 FPS | 243 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 192 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 168 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 90 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon W-1270P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 449 FPS |
| medium | 404 FPS | 405 FPS |
| high | 332 FPS | 350 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 310 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 420 FPS | 449 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 376 FPS |
| high | 303 FPS | 324 FPS |
| ultra | 263 FPS | 276 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 297 FPS | 302 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 260 FPS |
| high | 230 FPS | 245 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 209 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon W-1270P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 449 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 449 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 449 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 449 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 449 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 449 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 449 FPS |
| ultra | 432 FPS | 449 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 449 FPS |
| medium | 361 FPS | 449 FPS |
| high | 305 FPS | 432 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 362 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon W-1270P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 449 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 449 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 449 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 449 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 449 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 449 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 449 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 449 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 449 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 449 FPS |
| high | 413 FPS | 449 FPS |
| ultra | 357 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 3600 and Xeon W-1270P


Ryzen 5 3600
Ryzen 5 3600
The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.

Xeon W-1270P
Xeon W-1270P
The Xeon W-1270P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 17,961 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 3600 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon W-1270P offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon W-1270P has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 versus 5.1 GHz on the Xeon W-1270P — a 19.4% clock advantage for the Xeon W-1270P (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Ryzen 5 3600 is built on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 3600 scores 17,685 against the Xeon W-1270P's 17,961 — a 1.5% lead for the Xeon W-1270P. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600 vs 16 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Xeon W-1270P.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon W-1270P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz | 5.1 GHz+21% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz | 3.8 GHz+6% |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+100% | 16 MB Intel® Smart Cache |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | — |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (2019−2020) | — |
| PassMark | 17,685 | 17,961+2% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 9,500 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,295 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,898 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-1270P uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon W-1270P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: Yes (Ryzen 5 3600) / not specified (Xeon W-1270P). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon W-1270P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | Yes | — |
| Target Use | Gaming/Budget Workstation | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












