
Ryzen 5 3600
Popular choices:

Xeon D-1736NT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +23.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+113.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 15 MB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 67W, a 2W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon D-1736NT.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (17,685 vs 17,826).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-1736NT, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Xeon D-1736NT mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon D-1736NT
2022Why buy it
- ✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 3600 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (15 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Xeon D-1736NT
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +23.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+113.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 15 MB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 67W, a 2W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon D-1736NT.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (17,685 vs 17,826).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-1736NT, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Xeon D-1736NT mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 3600 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (15 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 3600 better than Xeon D-1736NT?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon D-1736NT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 161 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 154 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon D-1736NT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 283 FPS |
| medium | 404 FPS | 243 FPS |
| high | 332 FPS | 212 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 168 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 420 FPS | 249 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 220 FPS |
| high | 303 FPS | 194 FPS |
| ultra | 263 FPS | 153 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 297 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 164 FPS |
| high | 230 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 109 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon D-1736NT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 446 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 446 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 446 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 446 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 446 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 446 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 425 FPS |
| ultra | 432 FPS | 370 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 424 FPS |
| medium | 361 FPS | 330 FPS |
| high | 305 FPS | 294 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 236 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon D-1736NT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 446 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 446 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 446 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 446 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 446 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 446 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 446 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 443 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 446 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 417 FPS |
| high | 413 FPS | 373 FPS |
| ultra | 357 FPS | 326 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 3600 and Xeon D-1736NT


Ryzen 5 3600
Ryzen 5 3600
The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.

Xeon D-1736NT
Xeon D-1736NT
The Xeon D-1736NT is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2227. Thermal design power (TDP): 67 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 17,826 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 3600 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon D-1736NT offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon D-1736NT has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon D-1736NT — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 3600 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Ryzen 5 3600 is built on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 3600 scores 17,685 against the Xeon D-1736NT's 17,826 — a 0.8% lead for the Xeon D-1736NT. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600 vs 15 MB on the Xeon D-1736NT.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon D-1736NT |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz+20% | 3.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+33% | 2.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+113% | 15 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | — |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-30% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (2019−2020) | — |
| PassMark | 17,685 | 17,826 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 9,500 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,295 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,898 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon D-1736NT uses FCBGA2227 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon D-1736NT |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | FCBGA2227 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: Yes (Ryzen 5 3600) / not specified (Xeon D-1736NT). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon D-1736NT |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | Yes | — |
| Target Use | Gaming/Budget Workstation | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












