PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Xeon Gold 6130H

2018

Why buy it

✅Draws 125W instead of 270W, a 145W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w5-3425 across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (35,440 vs 36,178).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (22 MB vs 30 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 18.7 vs 30.4 PassMark/$ ($1,894 MSRP vs $1,189 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on FCLGA3647 with DDR4, while Xeon w5-3425 moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.

Xeon w5-3425

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +27.0% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+36.4% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 22 MB).
✅Costs $705 less on MSRP ($1,189 MSRP vs $1,894 MSRP).
✅Delivers 62.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 30.4 vs 18.7 PassMark/$ ($1,189 MSRP vs $1,894 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of FCLGA3647 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌116% higher power demand at 270W vs 125W.

Xeon Gold 6130H

2018

Xeon w5-3425

2023

Why buy it

✅Draws 125W instead of 270W, a 145W reduction.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +27.0% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+36.4% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 22 MB).
✅Costs $705 less on MSRP ($1,189 MSRP vs $1,894 MSRP).
✅Delivers 62.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 30.4 vs 18.7 PassMark/$ ($1,189 MSRP vs $1,894 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of FCLGA3647 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w5-3425 across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (35,440 vs 36,178).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (22 MB vs 30 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 18.7 vs 30.4 PassMark/$ ($1,894 MSRP vs $1,189 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on FCLGA3647 with DDR4, while Xeon w5-3425 moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.

Trade-offs

❌116% higher power demand at 270W vs 125W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon w5-3425 better than Xeon Gold 6130H?

Yes. Xeon w5-3425 is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 27.0% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data, 2.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon w5-3425 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 27.0% more average FPS across 49 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon w5-3425 is the better fit. You are getting 2.1% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 36.4% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 22 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon w5-3425 is the smarter buy today. Xeon w5-3425 is $705 cheaper on MSRP at $1,189 MSRP versus $1,894 MSRP, and it gives you a 27.0% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 62.6% better value on MSRP (30.4 vs 18.7 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon w5-3425 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2018), a healthier platform with LGA4677 and DDR5 instead of FCLGA3647, 36.4% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 22 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 12 cores / 24 threads instead of 16/32. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Xeon Gold 6130H Benchmark Check

Xeon w5-3425 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Xeon Gold 6130H	Xeon w5-3425
1080p
low	182 FPS	172 FPS
medium	146 FPS	155 FPS
high	119 FPS	127 FPS
ultra	93 FPS	107 FPS
1440p
low	144 FPS	143 FPS
medium	114 FPS	123 FPS
high	91 FPS	98 FPS
ultra	72 FPS	83 FPS
4K
low	67 FPS	77 FPS
medium	56 FPS	71 FPS
high	45 FPS	57 FPS
ultra	35 FPS	44 FPS

Open Xeon Gold 6130H Open Xeon w5-3425

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Xeon Gold 6130H	Xeon w5-3425
1080p
low	211 FPS	579 FPS
medium	186 FPS	497 FPS
high	160 FPS	417 FPS
ultra	135 FPS	378 FPS
1440p
low	182 FPS	490 FPS
medium	165 FPS	433 FPS
high	141 FPS	373 FPS
ultra	118 FPS	322 FPS
4K
low	118 FPS	303 FPS
medium	107 FPS	269 FPS
high	98 FPS	251 FPS
ultra	81 FPS	219 FPS

Open Xeon Gold 6130H Open Xeon w5-3425

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Xeon Gold 6130H	Xeon w5-3425
1080p
low	697 FPS	898 FPS
medium	559 FPS	812 FPS
high	507 FPS	775 FPS
ultra	439 FPS	691 FPS
1440p
low	558 FPS	781 FPS
medium	453 FPS	703 FPS
high	411 FPS	667 FPS
ultra	355 FPS	595 FPS
4K
low	405 FPS	523 FPS
medium	315 FPS	440 FPS
high	281 FPS	399 FPS
ultra	225 FPS	332 FPS

Open Xeon Gold 6130H Open Xeon w5-3425

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Xeon Gold 6130H	Xeon w5-3425
1080p
low	848 FPS	904 FPS
medium	771 FPS	904 FPS
high	666 FPS	884 FPS
ultra	581 FPS	765 FPS
1440p
low	684 FPS	904 FPS
medium	600 FPS	847 FPS
high	516 FPS	727 FPS
ultra	443 FPS	619 FPS
4K
low	471 FPS	683 FPS
medium	423 FPS	604 FPS
high	377 FPS	534 FPS
ultra	327 FPS	437 FPS

Open Xeon Gold 6130H Open Xeon w5-3425

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Gold 6130H and Xeon w5-3425

Xeon Gold 6130H

The Xeon Gold 6130H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCLGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 35,440 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon w5-3425

The Xeon w5-3425 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 February 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 36,178 points. Launch price was $1,189.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon Gold 6130H packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon w5-3425 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon Gold 6130H has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6130H versus 4.6 GHz on the Xeon w5-3425 — a 21.7% clock advantage for the Xeon w5-3425 (base: 2.1 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Xeon w5-3425 is built on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 6130H scores 35,440 against the Xeon w5-3425's 36,178 — a 2.1% lead for the Xeon w5-3425. L3 cache: 22 MB on the Xeon Gold 6130H vs 30 MB on the Xeon w5-3425.

Feature	Xeon Gold 6130H	Xeon w5-3425
Cores / Threads	16 / 32+33%	12 / 24
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz	4.6 GHz+24%
Base Clock	2.1 GHz	3.2 GHz+52%
L3 Cache	22 MB	30 MB+36%
L2 Cache	—	2 MB (per core)
Process	14 nm	Intel 7 nm-50%
Architecture	—	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	35,440	36,178+2%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon Gold 6130H uses the FCLGA3647 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon w5-3425 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 2666 on the Xeon Gold 6130H versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon w5-3425 — the Xeon Gold 6130H supports 199.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon w5-3425 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 768 — 136.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (Xeon Gold 6130H) vs 8 (Xeon w5-3425). PCIe lanes: 48 (Xeon Gold 6130H) vs 112 (Xeon w5-3425) — the Xeon w5-3425 offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C621 (Xeon Gold 6130H) and W790 (Xeon w5-3425).

Feature	Xeon Gold 6130H	Xeon w5-3425
Socket	FCLGA3647	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	2666+53220%	DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity	768	4096 GB+559240433%
RAM Channels	6	8+33%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	48	112+133%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 6130H rivals EPYC 7401.

Feature	Xeon Gold 6130H	Xeon w5-3425
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	—
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

The Xeon Gold 6130H launched at $1894 MSRP, while the Xeon w5-3425 debuted at $1189. On MSRP ($1894 vs $1189), the Xeon w5-3425 is $705 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon Gold 6130H delivers 18.7 pts/$ vs 30.4 pts/$ for the Xeon w5-3425 — making the Xeon w5-3425 the 47.7% better value option.