PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Xeon Gold 6130H

2018

Why buy it

✅Costs $4,406 less on MSRP ($1,894 MSRP vs $6,300 MSRP).
✅Delivers 232.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 18.7 vs 5.6 PassMark/$ ($1,894 MSRP vs $6,300 MSRP).
✅Draws 125W instead of 205W, a 80W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-3265M across 43 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (35,440 vs 35,506).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (22 MB vs 33 MB).

Xeon W-3265M

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +38.1% higher average FPS across 43 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (33 MB vs 22 MB).
✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 48) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 5.6 vs 18.7 PassMark/$ ($6,300 MSRP vs $1,894 MSRP).
❌64% higher power demand at 205W vs 125W.

Xeon Gold 6130H

2018

Xeon W-3265M

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $4,406 less on MSRP ($1,894 MSRP vs $6,300 MSRP).
✅Delivers 232.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 18.7 vs 5.6 PassMark/$ ($1,894 MSRP vs $6,300 MSRP).
✅Draws 125W instead of 205W, a 80W reduction.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +38.1% higher average FPS across 43 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (33 MB vs 22 MB).
✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 48) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-3265M across 43 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (35,440 vs 35,506).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (22 MB vs 33 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 5.6 vs 18.7 PassMark/$ ($6,300 MSRP vs $1,894 MSRP).
❌64% higher power demand at 205W vs 125W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W-3265M better than Xeon Gold 6130H?

Yes. Xeon W-3265M is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 38.1% average FPS lead across 43 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon W-3265M is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 38.1% more average FPS across 43 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-3265M is the better fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (33 MB vs 22 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon W-3265M is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon Gold 6130H makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Xeon W-3265M is 232.6% more expensive on MSRP at $6,300 MSRP versus $1,894 MSRP, and it gives you a 38.1% average FPS lead across 43 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon Gold 6130H is also 232.0% better value on MSRP (18.7 vs 5.6 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon W-3265M is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2018), 50% larger total L3 cache (33 MB vs 22 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 24 cores / 48 threads instead of 16/32. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Xeon Gold 6130H Benchmark Check

Xeon W-3265M Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Xeon Gold 6130H	Xeon W-3265M
1080p
low	182 FPS	198 FPS
medium	146 FPS	162 FPS
high	119 FPS	132 FPS
ultra	93 FPS	106 FPS
1440p
low	144 FPS	159 FPS
medium	114 FPS	125 FPS
high	91 FPS	100 FPS
ultra	72 FPS	83 FPS
4K
low	67 FPS	87 FPS
medium	56 FPS	74 FPS
high	45 FPS	58 FPS
ultra	35 FPS	47 FPS

Open Xeon Gold 6130H Open Xeon W-3265M

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Xeon Gold 6130H	Xeon W-3265M
1080p
low	211 FPS	535 FPS
medium	186 FPS	453 FPS
high	160 FPS	378 FPS
ultra	135 FPS	341 FPS
1440p
low	182 FPS	463 FPS
medium	165 FPS	403 FPS
high	141 FPS	341 FPS
ultra	118 FPS	295 FPS
4K
low	118 FPS	290 FPS
medium	107 FPS	253 FPS
high	98 FPS	232 FPS
ultra	81 FPS	204 FPS

Open Xeon Gold 6130H Open Xeon W-3265M

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Xeon Gold 6130H	Xeon W-3265M
1080p
low	697 FPS	888 FPS
medium	559 FPS	888 FPS
high	507 FPS	880 FPS
ultra	439 FPS	795 FPS
1440p
low	558 FPS	819 FPS
medium	453 FPS	719 FPS
high	411 FPS	679 FPS
ultra	355 FPS	604 FPS
4K
low	405 FPS	525 FPS
medium	315 FPS	430 FPS
high	281 FPS	388 FPS
ultra	225 FPS	314 FPS

Open Xeon Gold 6130H Open Xeon W-3265M

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Xeon Gold 6130H	Xeon W-3265M
1080p
low	848 FPS	888 FPS
medium	771 FPS	888 FPS
high	666 FPS	843 FPS
ultra	581 FPS	739 FPS
1440p
low	684 FPS	888 FPS
medium	600 FPS	765 FPS
high	516 FPS	675 FPS
ultra	443 FPS	581 FPS
4K
low	471 FPS	630 FPS
medium	423 FPS	549 FPS
high	377 FPS	492 FPS
ultra	327 FPS	426 FPS

Open Xeon Gold 6130H Open Xeon W-3265M

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Gold 6130H and Xeon W-3265M

Xeon Gold 6130H

The Xeon Gold 6130H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCLGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 35,440 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon W-3265M

The Xeon W-3265M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 33 MB. L2 cache: 24 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 35,506 points. Launch price was $6,353.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon Gold 6130H packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon W-3265M offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon W-3265M has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6130H versus 4.6 GHz on the Xeon W-3265M — a 21.7% clock advantage for the Xeon W-3265M (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Xeon W-3265M is built on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 6130H scores 35,440 against the Xeon W-3265M's 35,506 — a 0.2% lead for the Xeon W-3265M. L3 cache: 22 MB on the Xeon Gold 6130H vs 33 MB on the Xeon W-3265M.

Feature	Xeon Gold 6130H	Xeon W-3265M
Cores / Threads	16 / 32	24 / 48+50%
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz	4.6 GHz+24%
Base Clock	2.1 GHz	2.7 GHz+29%
L3 Cache	22 MB	33 MB+50%
L2 Cache	—	24 MB
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	—	Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark	35,440	35,506

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon Gold 6130H uses the FCLGA3647 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W-3265M uses LGA3647 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 2666 on the Xeon Gold 6130H versus 2933 on the Xeon W-3265M — the Xeon W-3265M supports 9.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-3265M supports up to 1024 of RAM compared to 768 — 28.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 6-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 48 (Xeon Gold 6130H) vs 64 (Xeon W-3265M) — the Xeon W-3265M offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C621 (Xeon Gold 6130H) and C620 (Xeon W-3265M).

Feature	Xeon Gold 6130H	Xeon W-3265M
Socket	FCLGA3647	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed	2666	2933+10%
Max RAM Capacity	768	1024+33%
RAM Channels	6	6
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	48	64+33%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 6130H rivals EPYC 7401; Xeon W-3265M rivals EPYC 7402.

Feature	Xeon Gold 6130H	Xeon W-3265M
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

The Xeon Gold 6130H launched at $1894 MSRP, while the Xeon W-3265M debuted at $6300. On MSRP ($1894 vs $6300), the Xeon Gold 6130H is $4406 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon Gold 6130H delivers 18.7 pts/$ vs 5.6 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3265M — making the Xeon Gold 6130H the 107.4% better value option.