
Xeon Gold 6130H
Popular choices:

Xeon Platinum 8268
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Xeon Gold 6130H
2018Why buy it
- ✅+1% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $4,408 less on MSRP ($1,894 MSRP vs $6,302 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 236.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 18.7 vs 5.6 PassMark/$ ($1,894 MSRP vs $6,302 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 205W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Platinum 8268 across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (22 MB vs 36 MB).
Xeon Platinum 8268
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +17.9% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+62.5% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 22 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (35,081 vs 35,440).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 5.6 vs 18.7 PassMark/$ ($6,302 MSRP vs $1,894 MSRP).
- ❌64% higher power demand at 205W vs 125W.
Xeon Gold 6130H
2018Xeon Platinum 8268
2019Why buy it
- ✅+1% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $4,408 less on MSRP ($1,894 MSRP vs $6,302 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 236.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 18.7 vs 5.6 PassMark/$ ($1,894 MSRP vs $6,302 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 205W, a 80W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +17.9% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+62.5% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 22 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Platinum 8268 across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (22 MB vs 36 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (35,081 vs 35,440).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 5.6 vs 18.7 PassMark/$ ($6,302 MSRP vs $1,894 MSRP).
- ❌64% higher power demand at 205W vs 125W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Gold 6130H better than Xeon Platinum 8268?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Xeon Gold 6130H | Xeon Platinum 8268 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 182 FPS | 194 FPS |
| medium | 146 FPS | 157 FPS |
| high | 119 FPS | 126 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 56 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Xeon Gold 6130H | Xeon Platinum 8268 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 211 FPS | 424 FPS |
| medium | 186 FPS | 370 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 303 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 249 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 182 FPS | 366 FPS |
| medium | 165 FPS | 322 FPS |
| high | 141 FPS | 266 FPS |
| ultra | 118 FPS | 212 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 118 FPS | 228 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 203 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 180 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 148 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Xeon Gold 6130H | Xeon Platinum 8268 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 697 FPS | 877 FPS |
| medium | 559 FPS | 877 FPS |
| high | 507 FPS | 872 FPS |
| ultra | 439 FPS | 787 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 558 FPS | 731 FPS |
| medium | 453 FPS | 632 FPS |
| high | 411 FPS | 600 FPS |
| ultra | 355 FPS | 537 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 405 FPS | 468 FPS |
| medium | 315 FPS | 368 FPS |
| high | 281 FPS | 328 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 269 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Xeon Gold 6130H | Xeon Platinum 8268 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 848 FPS | 877 FPS |
| medium | 771 FPS | 848 FPS |
| high | 666 FPS | 733 FPS |
| ultra | 581 FPS | 637 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 684 FPS | 736 FPS |
| medium | 600 FPS | 646 FPS |
| high | 516 FPS | 555 FPS |
| ultra | 443 FPS | 476 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 471 FPS | 531 FPS |
| medium | 423 FPS | 473 FPS |
| high | 377 FPS | 416 FPS |
| ultra | 327 FPS | 361 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Gold 6130H and Xeon Platinum 8268

Xeon Gold 6130H
Xeon Gold 6130H
The Xeon Gold 6130H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCLGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 35,440 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon Platinum 8268
Xeon Platinum 8268
The Xeon Platinum 8268 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 December 2018 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake-SP (2018) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 35.75 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 35,081 points. Launch price was $6,302.
Processing Power
The Xeon Gold 6130H packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8268 offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8268 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6130H versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8268 — a 5.3% clock advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8268 (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Xeon Platinum 8268 is built on the Cascade Lake-SP (2018) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 6130H scores 35,440 against the Xeon Platinum 8268's 35,081 — a 1% lead for the Xeon Gold 6130H. L3 cache: 22 MB on the Xeon Gold 6130H vs 35.75 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8268.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6130H | Xeon Platinum 8268 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 24 / 48+50% |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz | 3.9 GHz+5% |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz | 2.9 GHz+38% |
| L3 Cache | 22 MB | 35.75 MB (total)+63% |
| L2 Cache | — | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | — | Cascade Lake-SP (2018) |
| PassMark | 35,440+1% | 35,081 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 24,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,394 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 12,046 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon Gold 6130H uses the FCLGA3647 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8268 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 2666 on the Xeon Gold 6130H versus DDR4-2933 on the Xeon Platinum 8268 — the Xeon Gold 6130H supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8268 supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 768 — 28.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 6-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 48 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: C621 (Xeon Gold 6130H) and C621,Lewisburg (Xeon Platinum 8268).
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6130H | Xeon Platinum 8268 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCLGA3647 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 2666+66550% | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 768 | 1024 GB+139810033% |
| RAM Channels | 6 | 6 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 48 | 48 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6130H) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon Platinum 8268). Primary use case: Xeon Platinum 8268 targets High-end Server. Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 6130H rivals EPYC 7401; Xeon Platinum 8268 rivals EPYC 7452.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6130H | Xeon Platinum 8268 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | — | High-end Server |
Value Analysis
The Xeon Gold 6130H launched at $1894 MSRP, while the Xeon Platinum 8268 debuted at $6302. On MSRP ($1894 vs $6302), the Xeon Gold 6130H is $4408 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon Gold 6130H delivers 18.7 pts/$ vs 5.6 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8268 — making the Xeon Gold 6130H the 108.3% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6130H | Xeon Platinum 8268 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1894-70% | $6302 |
| Performance per Dollar | 18.7+234% | 5.6 |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













