EPYC 8124P vs Xeon Gold 6130H

CPU

GPU

EPYC 8124P

16 Cores32 Thrd125 WWMax: 3 GHz2023

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Xeon Gold 6130H

16 Cores32 Thrd125 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2018

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Performance Spectrum - CPU

EPYC 8124P

16 / 32

36,079

+1.8%

Ryzen Embedded V3C48

Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350

Ryzen 7 5800XT

Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX

Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Xeon Gold 6130H

16 / 32

35,440

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 8124P

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +18.5% higher average FPS across 38 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+190.9% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 22 MB).
✅Costs $1,255 less on MSRP ($639 MSRP vs $1,894 MSRP).
✅Delivers 201.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 56.5 vs 18.7 PassMark/$ ($639 MSRP vs $1,894 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on SP6 with DDR5 support instead of FCLGA3647 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Xeon Gold 6130H

2018

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 8124P across 38 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (35,440 vs 36,079).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (22 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 18.7 vs 56.5 PassMark/$ ($1,894 MSRP vs $639 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on FCLGA3647 with DDR4, while EPYC 8124P moves to SP6 and DDR5.

EPYC 8124P

2023

Xeon Gold 6130H

2018

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +18.5% higher average FPS across 38 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+190.9% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 22 MB).
✅Costs $1,255 less on MSRP ($639 MSRP vs $1,894 MSRP).
✅Delivers 201.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 56.5 vs 18.7 PassMark/$ ($639 MSRP vs $1,894 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on SP6 with DDR5 support instead of FCLGA3647 and DDR4.

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 8124P across 38 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (35,440 vs 36,079).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (22 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 18.7 vs 56.5 PassMark/$ ($1,894 MSRP vs $639 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on FCLGA3647 with DDR4, while EPYC 8124P moves to SP6 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 8124P better than Xeon Gold 6130H?

Yes. EPYC 8124P is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 18.5% average FPS lead across 38 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.8% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 8124P is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 18.5% more average FPS across 38 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 8124P is the better fit. You are getting 1.8% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 190.9% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 22 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 8124P is the smarter buy today. EPYC 8124P is $1,255 cheaper on MSRP at $639 MSRP versus $1,894 MSRP, and it gives you a 18.5% average FPS lead across 38 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 201.7% better value on MSRP (56.5 vs 18.7 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 8124P is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2018), a healthier platform with SP6 and DDR5 instead of FCLGA3647, 190.9% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 22 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 16/32. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 8124P Benchmark Check

Xeon Gold 6130H Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 8124P	Xeon Gold 6130H
1080p
low	153 FPS	182 FPS
medium	125 FPS	146 FPS
high	105 FPS	119 FPS
ultra	83 FPS	93 FPS
1440p
low	139 FPS	144 FPS
medium	111 FPS	114 FPS
high	87 FPS	91 FPS
ultra	70 FPS	72 FPS
4K
low	67 FPS	67 FPS
medium	57 FPS	56 FPS
high	44 FPS	45 FPS
ultra	36 FPS	35 FPS

Open EPYC 8124P Open Xeon Gold 6130H

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 8124P	Xeon Gold 6130H
1080p
low	387 FPS	211 FPS
medium	344 FPS	186 FPS
high	281 FPS	160 FPS
ultra	224 FPS	135 FPS
1440p
low	327 FPS	182 FPS
medium	296 FPS	165 FPS
high	250 FPS	141 FPS
ultra	191 FPS	118 FPS
4K
low	202 FPS	118 FPS
medium	186 FPS	107 FPS
high	157 FPS	98 FPS
ultra	127 FPS	81 FPS

Open EPYC 8124P Open Xeon Gold 6130H

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 8124P	Xeon Gold 6130H
1080p
low	856 FPS	697 FPS
medium	767 FPS	559 FPS
high	743 FPS	507 FPS
ultra	667 FPS	439 FPS
1440p
low	660 FPS	558 FPS
medium	573 FPS	453 FPS
high	546 FPS	411 FPS
ultra	487 FPS	355 FPS
4K
low	432 FPS	405 FPS
medium	341 FPS	315 FPS
high	305 FPS	281 FPS
ultra	250 FPS	225 FPS

Open EPYC 8124P Open Xeon Gold 6130H

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 8124P	Xeon Gold 6130H
1080p
low	902 FPS	848 FPS
medium	902 FPS	771 FPS
high	769 FPS	666 FPS
ultra	647 FPS	581 FPS
1440p
low	823 FPS	684 FPS
medium	707 FPS	600 FPS
high	596 FPS	516 FPS
ultra	488 FPS	443 FPS
4K
low	596 FPS	471 FPS
medium	521 FPS	423 FPS
high	449 FPS	377 FPS
ultra	372 FPS	327 FPS

Open EPYC 8124P Open Xeon Gold 6130H

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 8124P and Xeon Gold 6130H

EPYC 8124P

The EPYC 8124P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 18 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.45 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 36,079 points. Launch price was $639.

Xeon Gold 6130H

The Xeon Gold 6130H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCLGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 35,440 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the EPYC 8124P and Xeon Gold 6130H share an identical 16-core/32-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC 8124P versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6130H — a 20.9% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6130H (base: 2.45 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The EPYC 8124P is built on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. In PassMark, the EPYC 8124P scores 36,079 against the Xeon Gold 6130H's 35,440 — a 1.8% lead for the EPYC 8124P. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 8124P vs 22 MB on the Xeon Gold 6130H.

Feature	EPYC 8124P	Xeon Gold 6130H
Cores / Threads	16 / 32	16 / 32
Boost Clock	3 GHz	3.7 GHz+23%
Base Clock	2.45 GHz+17%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)+191%	22 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	—
Process	5 nm-64%	14 nm
Architecture	Siena (2023−2024)	—
PassMark	36,079+2%	35,440

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 8124P uses the SP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6130H uses FCLGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC 8124P versus 2666 on the Xeon Gold 6130H — the EPYC 8124P supports 57.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 8124P supports up to 2048 of RAM compared to 768 — 90.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 6-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 96 (EPYC 8124P) vs 48 (Xeon Gold 6130H) — the EPYC 8124P offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP6 (EPYC 8124P) and C621 (Xeon Gold 6130H).

Feature	EPYC 8124P	Xeon Gold 6130H
Socket	SP6	FCLGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	4800+80%	2666
Max RAM Capacity	2048+167%	768
RAM Channels	6	6
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	96+100%	48

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V, IOMMU (EPYC 8124P) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6130H). Direct competitor: EPYC 8124P rivals Xeon Gold 6426Y; Xeon Gold 6130H rivals EPYC 7401.

Feature	EPYC 8124P	Xeon Gold 6130H
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V, IOMMU	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 8124P launched at $639 MSRP, while the Xeon Gold 6130H debuted at $1894. On MSRP ($639 vs $1894), the EPYC 8124P is $1255 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 8124P delivers 56.5 pts/$ vs 18.7 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6130H — making the EPYC 8124P the 100.4% better value option.