
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX
Popular choices:

Xeon 6780E
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +33.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $8,451 less on MSRP ($2,899 MSRP vs $11,350 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 322.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 32.3 vs 7.6 PassMark/$ ($2,899 MSRP vs $11,350 MSRP).
- ✅45.5% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 88) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Xeon 6780E
2024Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (86,734 vs 93,660).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.6 vs 32.3 PassMark/$ ($11,350 MSRP vs $2,899 MSRP).
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX
2025Xeon 6780E
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +33.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $8,451 less on MSRP ($2,899 MSRP vs $11,350 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 322.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 32.3 vs 7.6 PassMark/$ ($2,899 MSRP vs $11,350 MSRP).
- ✅45.5% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 88) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (86,734 vs 93,660).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.6 vs 32.3 PassMark/$ ($11,350 MSRP vs $2,899 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX better than Xeon 6780E?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX | Xeon 6780E |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 314 FPS | 189 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 152 FPS |
| high | 241 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 203 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 278 FPS | 153 FPS |
| medium | 231 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 179 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 158 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 191 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 121 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX | Xeon 6780E |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 826 FPS | 244 FPS |
| medium | 704 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 548 FPS | 178 FPS |
| ultra | 474 FPS | 142 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 677 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 601 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 482 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 390 FPS | 120 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 378 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 341 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 311 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 81 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX | Xeon 6780E |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 893 FPS | 934 FPS |
| medium | 724 FPS | 831 FPS |
| high | 650 FPS | 779 FPS |
| ultra | 553 FPS | 693 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 716 FPS | 746 FPS |
| medium | 581 FPS | 655 FPS |
| high | 509 FPS | 614 FPS |
| ultra | 428 FPS | 546 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 509 FPS | 479 FPS |
| medium | 420 FPS | 378 FPS |
| high | 376 FPS | 334 FPS |
| ultra | 312 FPS | 272 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX | Xeon 6780E |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1116 FPS | 897 FPS |
| medium | 1002 FPS | 807 FPS |
| high | 879 FPS | 691 FPS |
| ultra | 792 FPS | 588 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 873 FPS | 697 FPS |
| medium | 769 FPS | 606 FPS |
| high | 675 FPS | 517 FPS |
| ultra | 588 FPS | 436 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 637 FPS | 500 FPS |
| medium | 568 FPS | 446 FPS |
| high | 505 FPS | 390 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 334 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX and Xeon 6780E


Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 July 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 93,660 points. Launch price was $2,899.

Xeon 6780E
Xeon 6780E
The Xeon 6780E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sierra Forest (2024) architecture. It features 144 cores and 144 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 108 MB (total). L2 cache: 4 MB (per module). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 330 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 86,734 points. Launch price was $11,350.
Processing Power
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon 6780E offers 144 cores / 144 threads — the Xeon 6780E has 120 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX versus 3 GHz on the Xeon 6780E — a 57.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX (base: 4.2 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX uses the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon 6780E uses Sierra Forest (2024) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX scores 93,660 against the Xeon 6780E's 86,734 — a 7.7% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX vs 108 MB (total) on the Xeon 6780E.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX | Xeon 6780E |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48 | 144 / 144+500% |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+80% | 3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.2 GHz+91% | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total)+19% | 108 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 4 MB (per module)+300% |
| Process | 4 nm | Intel 3 nm-25% |
| Architecture | Shimada Peak (2025) | Sierra Forest (2024) |
| PassMark | 93,660+8% | 86,734 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 60,336 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 3,349 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 30,722 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX uses the sTR5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon 6780E uses LGA4710 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6400 memory speed. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 4 TB — 199.2% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX) vs 88 (Xeon 6780E) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX | Xeon 6780E |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | sTR5 | LGA4710 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400 | DDR5-6400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2048 GB | 4 TB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+45% | 88 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX) vs VT-x, VT-d, VT-x EPT (Xeon 6780E). Primary use case: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX targets High-end Workstation, Xeon 6780E targets Cloud Native Compute. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX rivals Xeon w9-3595X; Xeon 6780E rivals EPYC 9754.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX | Xeon 6780E |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x, VT-d, VT-x EPT |
| Target Use | High-end Workstation | Cloud Native Compute |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX launched at $2899 MSRP, while the Xeon 6780E debuted at $11350. On MSRP ($2899 vs $11350), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX is $8451 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX delivers 32.3 pts/$ vs 7.6 pts/$ for the Xeon 6780E — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX the 123.5% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX | Xeon 6780E |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2899-74% | $11350 |
| Performance per Dollar | 32.3+325% | 7.6 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












