Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX vs Xeon w9-3595X

AMD

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX

24 Cores48 Thrd350 WWMax: 5.4 GHz2025

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Xeon w9-3595X

60 Cores120 Thrd385 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2024

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX

2025

Why buy it

  • Costs $2,990 less on MSRP ($2,899 MSRP vs $5,889 MSRP).
  • Delivers 95.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 32.3 vs 16.6 PassMark/$ ($2,899 MSRP vs $5,889 MSRP).
  • Draws 350W instead of 385W, a 35W reduction.
  • 14.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 112) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w9-3595X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (60,336 vs 130,000).

Xeon w9-3595X

2024

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +4.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.6 vs 32.3 PassMark/$ ($5,889 MSRP vs $2,899 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon w9-3595X better than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX?
Yes. Xeon w9-3595X is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 4.8% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data, 115.5% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, and 4.1% higher PassMark, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Xeon w9-3595X is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 4.8% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon w9-3595X is the better fit. You are getting 115.5% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 60 cores and 120 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon w9-3595X is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Xeon w9-3595X is 103.1% more expensive on MSRP at $5,889 MSRP versus $2,899 MSRP, and it gives you a 4.8% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX is also 95.1% better value on MSRP (32.3 vs 16.6 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2024). That extra cache should hold up really well in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRyzen Threadripper PRO 9965WXXeon w9-3595X
1080p
low314 FPS316 FPS
medium290 FPS306 FPS
high241 FPS246 FPS
ultra203 FPS207 FPS
1440p
low278 FPS274 FPS
medium231 FPS237 FPS
high179 FPS178 FPS
ultra158 FPS157 FPS
4K
low191 FPS186 FPS
medium158 FPS159 FPS
high121 FPS120 FPS
ultra107 FPS108 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRyzen Threadripper PRO 9965WXXeon w9-3595X
1080p
low826 FPS384 FPS
medium704 FPS332 FPS
high548 FPS270 FPS
ultra474 FPS236 FPS
1440p
low677 FPS308 FPS
medium601 FPS273 FPS
high482 FPS232 FPS
ultra390 FPS190 FPS
4K
low378 FPS181 FPS
medium341 FPS162 FPS
high311 FPS151 FPS
ultra272 FPS133 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRyzen Threadripper PRO 9965WXXeon w9-3595X
1080p
low893 FPS1025 FPS
medium724 FPS1086 FPS
high650 FPS1020 FPS
ultra553 FPS875 FPS
1440p
low716 FPS1009 FPS
medium581 FPS913 FPS
high509 FPS840 FPS
ultra428 FPS656 FPS
4K
low509 FPS605 FPS
medium420 FPS521 FPS
high376 FPS465 FPS
ultra312 FPS400 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRyzen Threadripper PRO 9965WXXeon w9-3595X
1080p
low1116 FPS1145 FPS
medium1002 FPS1015 FPS
high879 FPS901 FPS
ultra792 FPS802 FPS
1440p
low873 FPS928 FPS
medium769 FPS813 FPS
high675 FPS716 FPS
ultra588 FPS629 FPS
4K
low637 FPS678 FPS
medium568 FPS606 FPS
high505 FPS543 FPS
ultra437 FPS437 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX and Xeon w9-3595X

AMD

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 July 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 93,660 points. Launch price was $2,899.

Intel

Xeon w9-3595X

The Xeon w9-3595X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 60 cores and 120 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 112.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 385 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 97,534 points. Launch price was $5,889.

Processing Power

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon w9-3595X offers 60 cores / 120 threads — the Xeon w9-3595X has 36 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w9-3595X — a 11.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX (base: 4.2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX uses the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon w9-3595X uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX scores 93,660 against the Xeon w9-3595X's 97,534 — a 4.1% lead for the Xeon w9-3595X. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 60,336 vs 130,000 (73.2% advantage for the Xeon w9-3595X). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 3,349 vs 2,300, a 37.1% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 30,722 vs 17,118 (56.9% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX). L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX vs 112.5 MB on the Xeon w9-3595X.

FeatureRyzen Threadripper PRO 9965WXXeon w9-3595X
Cores / Threads
24 / 48
60 / 120+150%
Boost Clock
5.4 GHz+13%
4.8 GHz
Base Clock
4.2 GHz+110%
2 GHz
L3 Cache
128 MB (total)+14%
112.5 MB
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)+100%
Process
4 nm-43%
Intel 7 nm
Architecture
Shimada Peak (2025)
Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark
93,660
97,534+4%
Cinebench R23 Multi
60,336
130,000+115%
Geekbench 6 Single
3,349+46%
2,300
Geekbench 6 Multi
30,722+79%
17,118
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX uses the sTR5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon w9-3595X uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6400 memory speed. The Xeon w9-3595X supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 2048 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX) vs 112 (Xeon w9-3595X) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: WRX90,TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX) and W790 (Xeon w9-3595X).

FeatureRyzen Threadripper PRO 9965WXXeon w9-3595X
Socket
sTR5
LGA4677
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-6400
DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity
2048 GB
4096 GB+100%
RAM Channels
8
8
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
128+14%
112
🔧

Advanced Features

Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support true virtualization. Primary use case: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX targets High-end Workstation, Xeon w9-3595X targets High-end Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX rivals Xeon w9-3595X; Xeon w9-3595X rivals Threadripper PRO 7985WX.

FeatureRyzen Threadripper PRO 9965WXXeon w9-3595X
Integrated GPU
No
No
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
true
true
Target Use
High-end Workstation
High-end Workstation
💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX launched at $2899 MSRP, while the Xeon w9-3595X debuted at $5889. On MSRP ($2899 vs $5889), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX is $2990 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX delivers 32.3 pts/$ vs 16.6 pts/$ for the Xeon w9-3595X — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX the 64.4% better value option.

FeatureRyzen Threadripper PRO 9965WXXeon w9-3595X
MSRP
$2899-51%
$5889
Performance per Dollar
32.3+95%
16.6
Release Date
2025
2024