
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX
Popular choices:

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX
2023Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (2,669 vs 3,349).
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (48,000 vs 60,336).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 24.6 vs 32.3 PassMark/$ ($3,899 MSRP vs $2,899 MSRP).
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX
2025Why buy it
- ✅+25.5% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Costs $1,000 less on MSRP ($2,899 MSRP vs $3,899 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 31.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 32.3 vs 24.6 PassMark/$ ($2,899 MSRP vs $3,899 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX
2023Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX
2025Why buy it
Why buy it
- ✅+25.5% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Costs $1,000 less on MSRP ($2,899 MSRP vs $3,899 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 31.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 32.3 vs 24.6 PassMark/$ ($2,899 MSRP vs $3,899 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (2,669 vs 3,349).
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (48,000 vs 60,336).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 24.6 vs 32.3 PassMark/$ ($3,899 MSRP vs $2,899 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX better than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 314 FPS | 314 FPS |
| medium | 289 FPS | 290 FPS |
| high | 240 FPS | 241 FPS |
| ultra | 203 FPS | 203 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 278 FPS | 278 FPS |
| medium | 231 FPS | 231 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 179 FPS |
| ultra | 158 FPS | 158 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 191 FPS | 191 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 158 FPS |
| high | 121 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 107 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 807 FPS | 826 FPS |
| medium | 688 FPS | 704 FPS |
| high | 535 FPS | 548 FPS |
| ultra | 467 FPS | 474 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 666 FPS | 677 FPS |
| medium | 591 FPS | 601 FPS |
| high | 474 FPS | 482 FPS |
| ultra | 384 FPS | 390 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 372 FPS | 378 FPS |
| medium | 335 FPS | 341 FPS |
| high | 306 FPS | 311 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 272 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 891 FPS | 893 FPS |
| medium | 723 FPS | 724 FPS |
| high | 649 FPS | 650 FPS |
| ultra | 552 FPS | 553 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 714 FPS | 716 FPS |
| medium | 580 FPS | 581 FPS |
| high | 508 FPS | 509 FPS |
| ultra | 427 FPS | 428 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 508 FPS | 509 FPS |
| medium | 419 FPS | 420 FPS |
| high | 375 FPS | 376 FPS |
| ultra | 311 FPS | 312 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1116 FPS | 1116 FPS |
| medium | 1002 FPS | 1002 FPS |
| high | 879 FPS | 879 FPS |
| ultra | 792 FPS | 792 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 872 FPS | 873 FPS |
| medium | 768 FPS | 769 FPS |
| high | 674 FPS | 675 FPS |
| ultra | 587 FPS | 588 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 636 FPS | 637 FPS |
| medium | 568 FPS | 568 FPS |
| high | 504 FPS | 505 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX


Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 October 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Storm Peak (2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 95,891 points. Launch price was $3,899.


Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 July 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 93,660 points. Launch price was $2,899.
Processing Power
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX versus 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX — a 1.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX (base: 4 GHz vs 4.2 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX uses the Storm Peak (2023) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX uses Shimada Peak (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX scores 95,891 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX's 93,660 — a 2.4% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 48,000 vs 60,336 (22.8% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,669 vs 3,349, a 22.6% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 22,298 vs 30,722 (31.8% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX). Both processors carry 128 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64+33% | 24 / 48 |
| Boost Clock | 5.3 GHz | 5.4 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 4 GHz | 4.2 GHz+5% |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total) | 128 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm | 4 nm-20% |
| Architecture | Storm Peak (2023) | Shimada Peak (2025) |
| PassMark | 95,891+2% | 93,660 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 48,000 | 60,336+26% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,669 | 3,349+25% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 22,298 | 30,722+38% |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the sTR5 socket with PCIe 4.0. Both support up to DDR5-5200 memory speed. Both support up to 2048 GB of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: WRX90,TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX) and WRX90,TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX).
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | sTR5 | sTR5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200 | DDR5-6400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2048 GB | 2048 GB |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support true virtualization. Primary use case: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX targets Professional Workstation, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX targets High-end Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX rivals Xeon w7-3465X; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX rivals Xeon w9-3595X.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | true | true |
| Target Use | Professional Workstation | High-end Workstation |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX launched at $3899 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX debuted at $2899. On MSRP ($3899 vs $2899), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX is $1000 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX delivers 24.6 pts/$ vs 32.3 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX the 27.1% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3899 | $2899-26% |
| Performance per Dollar | 24.6 | 32.3+31% |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












