
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX
Popular choices:

Xeon w9-3595X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,990 less on MSRP ($3,899 MSRP vs $5,889 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 48.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 24.6 vs 16.6 PassMark/$ ($3,899 MSRP vs $5,889 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 350W instead of 385W, a 35W reduction.
- ✅14.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 112) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w9-3595X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (48,000 vs 130,000).
Xeon w9-3595X
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.6 vs 24.6 PassMark/$ ($5,889 MSRP vs $3,899 MSRP).
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX
2023Xeon w9-3595X
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,990 less on MSRP ($3,899 MSRP vs $5,889 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 48.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 24.6 vs 16.6 PassMark/$ ($3,899 MSRP vs $5,889 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 350W instead of 385W, a 35W reduction.
- ✅14.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 112) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w9-3595X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (48,000 vs 130,000).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.6 vs 24.6 PassMark/$ ($5,889 MSRP vs $3,899 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon w9-3595X better than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX | Xeon w9-3595X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 314 FPS | 316 FPS |
| medium | 289 FPS | 306 FPS |
| high | 240 FPS | 246 FPS |
| ultra | 203 FPS | 207 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 278 FPS | 274 FPS |
| medium | 231 FPS | 237 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 178 FPS |
| ultra | 158 FPS | 157 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 191 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 159 FPS |
| high | 121 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 108 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX | Xeon w9-3595X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 807 FPS | 384 FPS |
| medium | 688 FPS | 332 FPS |
| high | 535 FPS | 270 FPS |
| ultra | 467 FPS | 236 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 666 FPS | 308 FPS |
| medium | 591 FPS | 273 FPS |
| high | 474 FPS | 232 FPS |
| ultra | 384 FPS | 190 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 372 FPS | 181 FPS |
| medium | 335 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 306 FPS | 151 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 133 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX | Xeon w9-3595X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 891 FPS | 1025 FPS |
| medium | 723 FPS | 1086 FPS |
| high | 649 FPS | 1020 FPS |
| ultra | 552 FPS | 875 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 714 FPS | 1009 FPS |
| medium | 580 FPS | 913 FPS |
| high | 508 FPS | 840 FPS |
| ultra | 427 FPS | 656 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 508 FPS | 605 FPS |
| medium | 419 FPS | 521 FPS |
| high | 375 FPS | 465 FPS |
| ultra | 311 FPS | 400 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX | Xeon w9-3595X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1116 FPS | 1145 FPS |
| medium | 1002 FPS | 1015 FPS |
| high | 879 FPS | 901 FPS |
| ultra | 792 FPS | 802 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 872 FPS | 928 FPS |
| medium | 768 FPS | 813 FPS |
| high | 674 FPS | 716 FPS |
| ultra | 587 FPS | 629 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 636 FPS | 678 FPS |
| medium | 568 FPS | 606 FPS |
| high | 504 FPS | 543 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX and Xeon w9-3595X


Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 October 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Storm Peak (2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 95,891 points. Launch price was $3,899.

Xeon w9-3595X
Xeon w9-3595X
The Xeon w9-3595X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 60 cores and 120 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 112.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 385 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 97,534 points. Launch price was $5,889.
Processing Power
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Xeon w9-3595X offers 60 cores / 120 threads — the Xeon w9-3595X has 28 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w9-3595X — a 9.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX (base: 4 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX uses the Storm Peak (2023) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon w9-3595X uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX scores 95,891 against the Xeon w9-3595X's 97,534 — a 1.7% lead for the Xeon w9-3595X. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 48,000 vs 130,000 (92.1% advantage for the Xeon w9-3595X). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,669 vs 2,300, a 14.9% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 22,298 vs 17,118 (26.3% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX). L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX vs 112.5 MB on the Xeon w9-3595X.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX | Xeon w9-3595X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64 | 60 / 120+88% |
| Boost Clock | 5.3 GHz+10% | 4.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4 GHz+100% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total)+14% | 112.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 5 nm-29% | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Storm Peak (2023) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 95,891 | 97,534+2% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 48,000 | 130,000+171% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,669+16% | 2,300 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 22,298+30% | 17,118 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX uses the sTR5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon w9-3595X uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5200 memory speed. The Xeon w9-3595X supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 2048 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX) vs 112 (Xeon w9-3595X) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: WRX90,TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX) and W790 (Xeon w9-3595X).
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX | Xeon w9-3595X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | sTR5 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200 | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2048 GB | 4096 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+14% | 112 |
Advanced Features
Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support true virtualization. Primary use case: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX targets Professional Workstation, Xeon w9-3595X targets High-end Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX rivals Xeon w7-3465X; Xeon w9-3595X rivals Threadripper PRO 7985WX.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX | Xeon w9-3595X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | true | true |
| Target Use | Professional Workstation | High-end Workstation |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX launched at $3899 MSRP, while the Xeon w9-3595X debuted at $5889. On MSRP ($3899 vs $5889), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX is $1990 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX delivers 24.6 pts/$ vs 16.6 pts/$ for the Xeon w9-3595X — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX the 39% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX | Xeon w9-3595X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3899-34% | $5889 |
| Performance per Dollar | 24.6+48% | 16.6 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












