PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 5 3600

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $4,796 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $4,995 MSRP).
✅Delivers 457.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 88.9 vs 15.9 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $4,995 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 270W, a 205W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon 6737P.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon 6737P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (1,898 vs 45,000).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon 6737P, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 88 PCIe lanes.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Xeon 6737P moves to LGA4710 and DDR5.

Xeon 6737P

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 88 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅Newer platform on LGA4710 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅266.7% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.9 vs 88.9 PassMark/$ ($4,995 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
❌315.4% higher power demand at 270W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.

Ryzen 5 3600

2019

Xeon 6737P

2025

Why buy it

✅Costs $4,796 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $4,995 MSRP).
✅Delivers 457.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 88.9 vs 15.9 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $4,995 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 270W, a 205W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon 6737P.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 88 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅Newer platform on LGA4710 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅266.7% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon 6737P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (1,898 vs 45,000).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon 6737P, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 88 PCIe lanes.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Xeon 6737P moves to LGA4710 and DDR5.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.9 vs 88.9 PassMark/$ ($4,995 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
❌315.4% higher power demand at 270W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon 6737P better than Ryzen 5 3600?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon 6737P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 3600 is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon 6737P is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 6.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests. It also has a big cache advantage at 144 MB vs 32 MB.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon 6737P is the better fit. You are getting 2270.9% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 350% larger total L3 cache (144 MB vs 32 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon 6737P is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 5 3600 makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Xeon 6737P is 2410.1% more expensive on MSRP at $4,995 MSRP versus $199 MSRP, and it gives you a 6.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 5 3600 is also 457.4% better value on MSRP (88.9 vs 15.9 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon 6737P is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2019), a healthier platform with LGA4710 and DDR5 instead of AM4, 3D V-Cache and a much larger 144 MB L3 cache instead of 32 MB, more multi-core headroom with 32 cores / 64 threads instead of 6/12, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 5 3600 Benchmark Check

Xeon 6737P Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 5 3600	Xeon 6737P
1080p
low	200 FPS	190 FPS
medium	161 FPS	166 FPS
high	135 FPS	132 FPS
ultra	106 FPS	106 FPS
1440p
low	154 FPS	156 FPS
medium	119 FPS	132 FPS
high	96 FPS	101 FPS
ultra	75 FPS	83 FPS
4K
low	70 FPS	71 FPS
medium	58 FPS	63 FPS
high	46 FPS	49 FPS
ultra	36 FPS	40 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 3600 Open Xeon 6737P

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 5 3600	Xeon 6737P
1080p
low	442 FPS	520 FPS
medium	404 FPS	460 FPS
high	332 FPS	376 FPS
ultra	295 FPS	309 FPS
1440p
low	420 FPS	425 FPS
medium	359 FPS	383 FPS
high	303 FPS	321 FPS
ultra	263 FPS	256 FPS
4K
low	297 FPS	262 FPS
medium	259 FPS	239 FPS
high	230 FPS	212 FPS
ultra	201 FPS	176 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 3600 Open Xeon 6737P

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 5 3600	Xeon 6737P
1080p
low	442 FPS	883 FPS
medium	442 FPS	813 FPS
high	442 FPS	768 FPS
ultra	442 FPS	677 FPS
1440p
low	442 FPS	756 FPS
medium	442 FPS	692 FPS
high	442 FPS	650 FPS
ultra	432 FPS	581 FPS
4K
low	442 FPS	510 FPS
medium	361 FPS	429 FPS
high	305 FPS	383 FPS
ultra	242 FPS	318 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 3600 Open Xeon 6737P

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 5 3600	Xeon 6737P
1080p
low	442 FPS	985 FPS
medium	442 FPS	886 FPS
high	442 FPS	766 FPS
ultra	442 FPS	665 FPS
1440p
low	442 FPS	806 FPS
medium	442 FPS	701 FPS
high	442 FPS	604 FPS
ultra	442 FPS	519 FPS
4K
low	442 FPS	582 FPS
medium	442 FPS	521 FPS
high	413 FPS	462 FPS
ultra	357 FPS	397 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 3600 Open Xeon 6737P

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 3600 and Xeon 6737P

Ryzen 5 3600

The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.

Xeon 6737P

The Xeon 6737P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 144 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 79,634 points. Launch price was $4,995.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 3600 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon 6737P offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Xeon 6737P has 26 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 versus 4 GHz on the Xeon 6737P — a 4.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 3600 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon 6737P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 3600 scores 17,685 against the Xeon 6737P's 79,634 — a 127.3% lead for the Xeon 6737P. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,295 vs 2,000, a 42.8% lead for the Xeon 6737P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,898 vs 45,000 (183.8% advantage for the Xeon 6737P). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600 vs 144 MB (total) on the Xeon 6737P.

Feature	Ryzen 5 3600	Xeon 6737P
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	32 / 64+433%
Boost Clock	4.2 GHz+5%	4 GHz
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+24%	2.9 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)	144 MB (total)+350%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	2 MB (per core)+300%
Process	7 nm, 12 nm	Intel 3 nm-57%
Architecture	Matisse (2019−2020)	Granite Rapids (2024−2025)
PassMark	17,685	79,634+350%
Cinebench R23 Multi	9,500	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,295	2,000+54%
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,898	45,000+2271%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon 6737P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 3600 versus DDR5-6400 on the Xeon 6737P — the Xeon 6737P supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon 6737P supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 5 3600) vs 8 (Xeon 6737P). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 5 3600) vs 88 (Xeon 6737P) — the Xeon 6737P offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD B550,AMD X570,AMD B450,AMD X470 (Ryzen 5 3600) and C741 (Xeon 6737P).

Feature	Ryzen 5 3600	Xeon 6737P
Socket	AM4	LGA4710
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	DDR5-6400+25%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	4096 GB+3100%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	24	88+267%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 5 3600 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon 6737P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: Yes (Ryzen 5 3600) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon 6737P). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation, Xeon 6737P targets High Performance Server. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400; Xeon 6737P rivals EPYC 9005.

Feature	Ryzen 5 3600	Xeon 6737P
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	—	None
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	Yes	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Gaming/Budget Workstation	High Performance Server

💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen 5 3600 launched at $199 MSRP, while the Xeon 6737P debuted at $4995. On MSRP ($199 vs $4995), the Ryzen 5 3600 is $4796 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 3600 delivers 88.9 pts/$ vs 15.9 pts/$ for the Xeon 6737P — making the Ryzen 5 3600 the 139.2% better value option.