G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,750 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 613.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 6.7 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 130W instead of 250W, a 120W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than TITAN V across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

TITAN V

2017

Why buy it

✅46.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).

Trade-offs

❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 12 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
1104.4% HIGHER MSRP
$2,999 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.7 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($2,999 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
❌92.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 130W.

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

2022

TITAN V

2017

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,750 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 613.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 6.7 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 130W instead of 250W, a 120W reduction.

Why buy it

✅46.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than TITAN V across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Trade-offs

❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 12 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
1104.4% HIGHER MSRP
$2,999 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.7 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($2,999 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
❌92.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 130W.

Quick Answers

So, is TITAN V better than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM?

Yes. TITAN V is clearly the better overall GPU here. TITAN V averages 46.9% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 20,077 vs 11,892 in G3D Mark. On top of that, TITAN V is a 2017 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is a 2022 model from an older generation with DLSS Super Resolution. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2022 generation instead of 2017, better upscaling support with DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 8nm process instead of 12nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

TITAN V is the smarter buy by a wide margin. TITAN V is about 1104.4% more expensive on MSRP at $2,999 MSRP versus $249 MSRP, and you are getting 46.9% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 68.8% higher G3D Mark. GeForce RTX 3050 OEM really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

When does GeForce RTX 3050 OEM make more sense than TITAN V?

Yes. GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (130W vs 250W), future-proofing, and staying closer to $249 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of TITAN V. The trade-off is that TITAN V currently gives you 68.8% higher G3D Mark and 46.9% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. GeForce RTX 3050 OEM still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Benchmark Check

TITAN V Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	TITAN V
1080p
low	130 FPS	153 FPS
medium	113 FPS	131 FPS
high	99 FPS	114 FPS
ultra	83 FPS	76 FPS
1440p
low	119 FPS	126 FPS
medium	96 FPS	103 FPS
high	81 FPS	81 FPS
ultra	69 FPS	55 FPS
4K
low	64 FPS	59 FPS
medium	57 FPS	51 FPS
high	39 FPS	35 FPS
ultra	33 FPS	29 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Open TITAN V

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	TITAN V
1080p
low	239 FPS	352 FPS
medium	206 FPS	317 FPS
high	164 FPS	240 FPS
ultra	128 FPS	197 FPS
1440p
low	163 FPS	234 FPS
medium	135 FPS	206 FPS
high	112 FPS	164 FPS
ultra	92 FPS	133 FPS
4K
low	88 FPS	117 FPS
medium	74 FPS	99 FPS
high	62 FPS	84 FPS
ultra	49 FPS	65 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Open TITAN V

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	TITAN V
1080p
low	535 FPS	875 FPS
medium	428 FPS	715 FPS
high	357 FPS	602 FPS
ultra	268 FPS	452 FPS
1440p
low	401 FPS	678 FPS
medium	321 FPS	542 FPS
high	268 FPS	452 FPS
ultra	201 FPS	339 FPS
4K
low	268 FPS	452 FPS
medium	214 FPS	361 FPS
high	178 FPS	301 FPS
ultra	134 FPS	226 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Open TITAN V

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	TITAN V
1080p
low	467 FPS	303 FPS
medium	414 FPS	263 FPS
high	335 FPS	218 FPS
ultra	268 FPS	191 FPS
1440p
low	372 FPS	233 FPS
medium	321 FPS	208 FPS
high	236 FPS	173 FPS
ultra	197 FPS	149 FPS
4K
low	199 FPS	141 FPS
medium	175 FPS	120 FPS
high	150 FPS	95 FPS
ultra	125 FPS	79 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Open TITAN V

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and TITAN V

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.

TITAN V

The TITAN V is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 7 2017. It features the Volta architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1455 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,077 points. Launch price was $2,999.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 11,892 versus the TITAN V's 20,077 — the TITAN V leads by 68.8%. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on Ampere while the TITAN V uses Volta, both on 8 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 5,120 (TITAN V). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 14.9 TFLOPS (TITAN V). Boost clocks: 1755 MHz vs 1455 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	TITAN V
G3D Mark Score	11,892	20,077+69%
Architecture	Ampere	Volta
Process Node	8 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	2560	5120+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)	8.986 TFLOPS	14.9 TFLOPS+66%
Boost Clock	1755 MHz+21%	1455 MHz
ROPs	32	96+200%
TMUs	80	320+300%
L1 Cache	2.5 MB	7.5 MB+200%
L2 Cache	2 MB	4.5 MB+125%
Tensor Cores	80	640+700%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The TITAN V relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	TITAN V
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the TITAN V has 12 GB. The TITAN V offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 653 GB/s (TITAN V) — a 191.5% advantage for the TITAN V. Bus width: 128-bit vs 3072-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 4.5 MB (TITAN V) — the TITAN V has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	TITAN V
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	12 GB+50%
Memory Type	GDDR6	HBM2
Memory Bandwidth	224 GB/s	653 GB/s+192%
Bus Width	128-bit	3072-bit+2300%
L2 Cache	2 MB	4.5 MB+125%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 12.1 (TITAN V). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	TITAN V
DirectX	12.2	12.1
Vulkan	1.3+8%	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs NVENC 6.0 (TITAN V). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs PureVideo HD VP9. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (TITAN V).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	TITAN V
Encoder	8th Gen NVENC	NVENC 6.0
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	PureVideo HD VP9
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM draws 130W versus the TITAN V's 250W — a 63.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 600W (TITAN V). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 235mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	TITAN V
TDP	130W-48%	250W
Recommended PSU	450W-25%	600W
Power Connector	8-pin	2x 8-pin
Length	235mm	267mm
Height	124mm	112mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	75°C-12%	85°C
Perf/Watt	91.5+14%	80.3

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 MSRP, while the TITAN V launched at $2999. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM costs 91.7% less ($2750 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 47.8 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 6.7 (TITAN V) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 613.4% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2017).