G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

2022

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌62.5% higher power demand at 130W vs 80W.

Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design

2019

Why buy it

✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅Draws 80W instead of 130W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 47.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

2022

Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design

2019

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅Draws 80W instead of 130W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌62.5% higher power demand at 130W vs 80W.

Trade-offs

❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 47.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design better than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM?

Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 11,892 vs 12,173 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design is the overall package: you are getting DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, plus much lower power draw (80W vs 130W).

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2022 generation instead of 2019, the stronger feature stack with DLSS Super Resolution instead of DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, and a 8nm process instead of 12nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $249 MSRP. Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus $249 MSRP, and you are getting 2.4% higher G3D Mark. GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the newer 2022 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does GeForce RTX 3050 OEM make more sense than Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design?

Yes. GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, future-proofing, and staying closer to $249 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design. The trade-off is that Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design currently gives you 2.4% higher G3D Mark. GeForce RTX 3050 OEM still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Benchmark Check

Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design
1080p
low	130 FPS	162 FPS
medium	113 FPS	142 FPS
high	99 FPS	117 FPS
ultra	83 FPS	73 FPS
1440p
low	119 FPS	130 FPS
medium	96 FPS	109 FPS
high	81 FPS	82 FPS
ultra	69 FPS	52 FPS
4K
low	64 FPS	50 FPS
medium	57 FPS	43 FPS
high	39 FPS	31 FPS
ultra	33 FPS	26 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Open Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design
1080p
low	239 FPS	174 FPS
medium	206 FPS	139 FPS
high	164 FPS	117 FPS
ultra	128 FPS	100 FPS
1440p
low	163 FPS	134 FPS
medium	135 FPS	105 FPS
high	112 FPS	90 FPS
ultra	92 FPS	74 FPS
4K
low	88 FPS	78 FPS
medium	74 FPS	63 FPS
high	62 FPS	53 FPS
ultra	49 FPS	40 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Open Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design
1080p
low	535 FPS	548 FPS
medium	428 FPS	438 FPS
high	357 FPS	365 FPS
ultra	268 FPS	274 FPS
1440p
low	401 FPS	411 FPS
medium	321 FPS	329 FPS
high	268 FPS	274 FPS
ultra	201 FPS	205 FPS
4K
low	268 FPS	274 FPS
medium	214 FPS	219 FPS
high	178 FPS	183 FPS
ultra	134 FPS	137 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Open Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design
1080p
low	467 FPS	247 FPS
medium	414 FPS	214 FPS
high	335 FPS	172 FPS
ultra	268 FPS	145 FPS
1440p
low	372 FPS	189 FPS
medium	321 FPS	167 FPS
high	236 FPS	131 FPS
ultra	197 FPS	108 FPS
4K
low	199 FPS	112 FPS
medium	175 FPS	94 FPS
high	150 FPS	76 FPS
ultra	125 FPS	58 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Open Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.

Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design

The Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 780 MHz to 1380 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,173 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 11,892 and the Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design reaches 12,173 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on Ampere while the Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design uses Turing, both on 8 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 2,560 (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 7.066 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design). Boost clocks: 1755 MHz vs 1380 MHz. Ray tracing: 20 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 40 (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design) with 80 Tensor cores vs 320.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design
G3D Mark Score	11,892	12,173+2%
Architecture	Ampere	Turing
Process Node	8 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	2560	2560
Compute (TFLOPS)	8.986 TFLOPS+27%	7.066 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1755 MHz+27%	1380 MHz
ROPs	32	64+100%
TMUs	80	160+100%
L1 Cache	2.5 MB	2.5 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB	4 MB+100%
Ray Tracing Cores	20	40+100%
Tensor Cores	80	320+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	Not Supported	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction	No	Yes (DLSS 3.5)
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 4 MB (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design) — the Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	256-bit+100%
L2 Cache	2 MB	4 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 12.2 (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design
DirectX	12.2	12.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 7th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design
Encoder	8th Gen NVENC	7th Gen NVENC
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM draws 130W versus the Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design's 80W — a 47.6% difference. The Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 500W (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 235mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design
TDP	130W	80W-38%
Recommended PSU	450W-10%	500W
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	235mm	0mm
Height	124mm	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	75°C-6%	80°C
Perf/Watt	91.5	152.2+66%