
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:

Tesla P40
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $5,450 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 2205% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 2.1 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 250W, a 120W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Tesla P40
2016Why buy it
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 24 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌2188.8% HIGHER MSRP$5,699 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.1 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($5,699 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 130W.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Tesla P40
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $5,450 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 2205% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 2.1 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 250W, a 120W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 24 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌2188.8% HIGHER MSRP$5,699 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.1 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($5,699 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 130W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 OEM better than Tesla P40?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Tesla P40 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 243 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 230 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 197 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 161 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 224 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 151 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 124 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 67 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 239 FPS | 326 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 281 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 215 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 213 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 179 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 115 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 84 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 54 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 531 FPS |
| medium | 428 FPS | 425 FPS |
| high | 357 FPS | 354 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 266 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 401 FPS | 399 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 319 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 266 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 199 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 268 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 213 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 133 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 473 FPS |
| medium | 414 FPS | 420 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 354 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 266 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 372 FPS | 374 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 319 FPS |
| high | 236 FPS | 266 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 199 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 199 FPS | 240 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 213 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 133 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and Tesla P40

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.

Tesla P40
Tesla P40
The Tesla P40 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 13 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1303 MHz to 1531 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,808 points. Launch price was $5,699.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 11,892 and the Tesla P40 reaches 11,808 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on Ampere while the Tesla P40 uses Pascal, both on 8 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 3,840 (Tesla P40). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 11.76 TFLOPS (Tesla P40). Boost clocks: 1755 MHz vs 1531 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,892 | 11,808 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 3840+50% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.986 TFLOPS | 11.76 TFLOPS+31% |
| Boost Clock | 1755 MHz+15% | 1531 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 96+200% |
| TMUs | 80 | 240+200% |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB+79% | 1.4 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Tesla P40 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla P40 has 24 GB. The Tesla P40 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 3 MB (Tesla P40) — the Tesla P40 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 24 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 12.1 (Tesla P40). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs NVENC 4.0 (2x) (Tesla P40). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Tesla P40).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | NVENC 4.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM draws 130W versus the Tesla P40's 250W — a 63.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 500W (Tesla P40). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 235mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W-48% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-10% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 235mm | 267mm |
| Height | 124mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 91.5+94% | 47.2 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 MSRP, while the Tesla P40 launched at $5699. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM costs 95.6% less ($5450 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 47.8 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 2.1 (Tesla P40) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 2176.2% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-96% | $5699 |
| Performance per Dollar | 47.8+2176% | 2.1 |
| Codename | GA106 | GP102 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | September 13 2016 |
| Ranking | #224 | #227 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













