
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:

Intel Arc Pro B50
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅14.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 36.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 35.0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Trade-offs
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Intel Arc Pro B50 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 130W vs 70W.
- ❌40.7% longer card at 235mm vs 167mm.
Intel Arc Pro B50
2025Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Xe2 (2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 130W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅Measures 167mm instead of 235mm, a 68mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌40.2% HIGHER MSRP$349 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 35.0 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Intel Arc Pro B50
2025Why buy it
- ✅14.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 36.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 35.0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Xe2 (2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 130W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅Measures 167mm instead of 235mm, a 68mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Intel Arc Pro B50 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 130W vs 70W.
- ❌40.7% longer card at 235mm vs 167mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌40.2% HIGHER MSRP$349 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 35.0 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 OEM better than Intel Arc Pro B50?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Intel Arc Pro B50 make more sense than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 64 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 45 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 36 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 26 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 51 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 15 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 33 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 20 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 10 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 239 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 41 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 45 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 33 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 28 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 21 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 549 FPS |
| medium | 428 FPS | 439 FPS |
| high | 357 FPS | 366 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 275 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 401 FPS | 412 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 330 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 275 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 206 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 268 FPS | 275 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 220 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 183 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 137 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 549 FPS |
| medium | 414 FPS | 439 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 366 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 275 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 372 FPS | 412 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 330 FPS |
| high | 236 FPS | 275 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 206 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 199 FPS | 275 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 220 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 183 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 137 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and Intel Arc Pro B50

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.

Intel Arc Pro B50
Intel Arc Pro B50
The Intel Arc Pro B50 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2025. It features the Xe2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2600 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,208 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 11,892 and the Intel Arc Pro B50 reaches 12,208 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on Ampere while the Intel Arc Pro B50 uses Xe2, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 2,048 (Intel Arc Pro B50). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 10.65 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro B50). Boost clocks: 1755 MHz vs 2600 MHz. Ray tracing: 20 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 16 (Intel Arc Pro B50) with 80 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,892 | 12,208+3% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Xe2 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+25% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.986 TFLOPS | 10.65 TFLOPS+19% |
| Boost Clock | 1755 MHz | 2600 MHz+48% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 80 | 128+60% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 20+25% | 16 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Intel Arc Pro B50 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 4 MB (Intel Arc Pro B50) — the Intel Arc Pro B50 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 12.2 (Intel Arc Pro B50). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs Dual Arc Media Engine (Intel Arc Pro B50). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs Dual Arc Media Engine. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Intel Arc Pro B50).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | Dual Arc Media Engine |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | Dual Arc Media Engine |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM draws 130W versus the Intel Arc Pro B50's 70W — a 60% difference. The Intel Arc Pro B50 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 500W (Intel Arc Pro B50). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 235mm vs 167mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W | 70W-46% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-10% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 235mm | 167mm |
| Height | 124mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 91.5 | 174.4+91% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 MSRP, while the Intel Arc Pro B50 launched at $349. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM costs 28.7% less ($100 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 47.8 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 35.0 (Intel Arc Pro B50) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 36.6% better value. The Intel Arc Pro B50 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-29% | $349 |
| Performance per Dollar | 47.8+37% | 35.0 |
| Codename | GA106 | BMG-G21 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | September 5 2025 |
| Ranking | #224 | #221 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













