
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
Popular choices:

TITAN RTX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $500 less on MSRP ($1,999 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 28.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.3 vs 8.0 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 280W, a 210W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than TITAN RTX across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (192 vs 576), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
TITAN RTX
2018Why buy it
- ✅76.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅200% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (576 vs 192).
- ✅1100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 24 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌25% HIGHER MSRP$2,499 MSRPvs$1,999 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.0 vs 10.3 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ❌300% higher power demand at 280W vs 70W.
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
2023TITAN RTX
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $500 less on MSRP ($1,999 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 28.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.3 vs 8.0 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 280W, a 210W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅76.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅200% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (576 vs 192).
- ✅1100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than TITAN RTX across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (192 vs 576), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 24 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌25% HIGHER MSRP$2,499 MSRPvs$1,999 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.0 vs 10.3 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ❌300% higher power demand at 280W vs 70W.
Quick Answers
So, is RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation better than TITAN RTX?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is TITAN RTX still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 102 FPS | 199 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 185 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 161 FPS |
| ultra | 48 FPS | 145 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 126 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 115 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 33 FPS | 115 FPS |
| medium | 30 FPS | 95 FPS |
| high | 22 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 20 FPS | 66 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 268 FPS | 493 FPS |
| medium | 213 FPS | 427 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 350 FPS |
| ultra | 148 FPS | 296 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 198 FPS | 333 FPS |
| medium | 151 FPS | 280 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 233 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 188 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 91 FPS | 152 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 48 FPS | 90 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 465 FPS | 904 FPS |
| medium | 404 FPS | 723 FPS |
| high | 341 FPS | 603 FPS |
| ultra | 288 FPS | 452 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 339 FPS | 678 FPS |
| medium | 295 FPS | 543 FPS |
| high | 256 FPS | 452 FPS |
| ultra | 208 FPS | 339 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 229 FPS | 452 FPS |
| medium | 192 FPS | 362 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 301 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 226 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 166 FPS | 632 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 555 FPS |
| high | 117 FPS | 478 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 439 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 121 FPS | 525 FPS |
| medium | 102 FPS | 459 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 396 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 339 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 73 FPS | 337 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 303 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 282 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 226 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation and TITAN RTX

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 720 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,669 points.

TITAN RTX
TITAN RTX
The TITAN RTX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 18 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1350 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 280W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,095 points. Launch price was $2,499.
Graphics Performance
The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation scores 20,669 and the TITAN RTX reaches 20,095 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is built on Ada Lovelace while the TITAN RTX uses Turing, both on 5 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 6,144 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 4,608 (TITAN RTX). Raw compute: 19.17 TFLOPS (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 16.31 TFLOPS (TITAN RTX). Boost clocks: 1560 MHz vs 1770 MHz. Ray tracing: 48 RT cores (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 72 (TITAN RTX) with 192 Tensor cores vs 576.
| Feature | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,669+3% | 20,095 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Turing |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 6144+33% | 4608 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 19.17 TFLOPS+18% | 16.31 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1560 MHz | 1770 MHz+13% |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 192 | 288+50% |
| L1 Cache | 6 MB+33% | 4.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+700% | 6 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 48 | 72+50% |
| Tensor Cores | 192 | 576+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The TITAN RTX lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The TITAN RTX supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the TITAN RTX has 24 GB. The TITAN RTX offers 1100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 280 GB/s (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 672 GB/s (TITAN RTX) — a 140% advantage for the TITAN RTX. Bus width: 160-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 6 MB (TITAN RTX) — the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 24 GB+1100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 ECC | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 280 GB/s | 672 GB/s+140% |
| Bus Width | 160-bit | 384-bit+140% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+700% | 6 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 12 Ultimate (TITAN RTX). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs NVENC (7th Gen) (TITAN RTX). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC (4th Gen). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (TITAN RTX).
| Feature | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) | NVENC (7th Gen) |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC (4th Gen) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation draws 70W versus the TITAN RTX's 280W — a 120% difference. The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 650W (TITAN RTX). Power connectors: 1x 8-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80.
| Feature | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-75% | 280W |
| Recommended PSU | 750W | 650W-13% |
| Power Connector | 1x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 116mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 295.3+311% | 71.8 |
Value Analysis
The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation launched at $1999 MSRP, while the TITAN RTX launched at $2499. The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation costs 20% less ($500 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 10.3 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 8.0 (TITAN RTX) — the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation offers 28.8% better value. The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2018).
| Feature | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1999-20% | $2499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.3+29% | 8.0 |
| Codename | AD104 | TU102 |
| Release | March 21 2023 | December 18 2018 |
| Ranking | #71 | #91 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












