
Radeon RX 6800
Popular choices:

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon RX 6800
2020Why buy it
- ✅55.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $1,420 less on MSRP ($579 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 268.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 38.1 vs 10.3 G3D/$ ($579 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Measures 240mm instead of 267mm, a 27mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌257.1% higher power demand at 250W vs 70W.
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
2023Why buy it
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 250W, a 180W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6800 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌245.3% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$579 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.3 vs 38.1 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $579 MSRP).
- ❌11.3% longer card at 267mm vs 240mm.
Radeon RX 6800
2020RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
2023Why buy it
- ✅55.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $1,420 less on MSRP ($579 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 268.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 38.1 vs 10.3 G3D/$ ($579 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Measures 240mm instead of 267mm, a 27mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 250W, a 180W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌257.1% higher power demand at 250W vs 70W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6800 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌245.3% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$579 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.3 vs 38.1 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $579 MSRP).
- ❌11.3% longer card at 267mm vs 240mm.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 6800 better than RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation make more sense than Radeon RX 6800?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon RX 6800 | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 221 FPS | 102 FPS |
| medium | 203 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 161 FPS | 48 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 167 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 138 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 129 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 135 FPS | 33 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 30 FPS |
| high | 90 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 20 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon RX 6800 | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 508 FPS | 268 FPS |
| medium | 436 FPS | 213 FPS |
| high | 346 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 148 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 338 FPS | 198 FPS |
| medium | 283 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 189 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 48 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon RX 6800 | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 901 FPS | 465 FPS |
| medium | 734 FPS | 404 FPS |
| high | 637 FPS | 341 FPS |
| ultra | 496 FPS | 288 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 691 FPS | 339 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 295 FPS |
| high | 471 FPS | 256 FPS |
| ultra | 372 FPS | 208 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 482 FPS | 229 FPS |
| medium | 391 FPS | 192 FPS |
| high | 324 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 113 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon RX 6800 | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 641 FPS | 166 FPS |
| medium | 547 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 481 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 434 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 536 FPS | 121 FPS |
| medium | 462 FPS | 102 FPS |
| high | 395 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 349 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 343 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 306 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 276 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 243 FPS | 37 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 6800 and RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

Radeon RX 6800
Radeon RX 6800
The Radeon RX 6800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2105 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,056 points. Launch price was $579.

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 720 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,669 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon RX 6800 scores 22,056 versus the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation's 20,669 — the Radeon RX 6800 leads by 6.7%. The Radeon RX 6800 is built on RDNA 2.0 while the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on 7 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 3,840 (Radeon RX 6800) vs 6,144 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation). Raw compute: 16.17 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6800) vs 19.17 TFLOPS (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 2105 MHz vs 1560 MHz. Ray tracing: 60 RT cores (Radeon RX 6800) vs 48 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 192.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6800 | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,056+7% | 20,669 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 3840 | 6144+60% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.17 TFLOPS | 19.17 TFLOPS+19% |
| Boost Clock | 2105 MHz+35% | 1560 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 240+25% | 192 |
| L1 Cache | 0.75 MB | 6 MB+700% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 48 MB+1100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 60+25% | 48 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both cards support Frame Generation, but the Radeon RX 6800 is on a newer tier with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF, while the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation tops out at DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation.The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 6800 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6800 | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 6800 comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation has 2 GB. The Radeon RX 6800 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 512 GB/s (Radeon RX 6800) vs 280 GB/s (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) — a 82.9% advantage for the Radeon RX 6800. Bus width: 256-bit vs 160-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon RX 6800) vs 48 MB (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) — the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6800 | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+700% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 ECC |
| Memory Bandwidth | 512 GB/s+83% | 280 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+60% | 160-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 48 MB+1100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon RX 6800) vs 12.2 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6800 | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 6800) vs 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 6800) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6800 | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 6800 draws 250W versus the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation's 70W — a 112.5% difference. The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon RX 6800) vs 750W (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs 1x 8-pin. Card length: 240mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6800 | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 70W-72% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W-13% | 750W |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
| Length | 240mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 88.2 | 295.3+235% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 6800 launched at $579 MSRP, while the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation launched at $1999. The Radeon RX 6800 costs 71% less ($1420 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 38.1 (Radeon RX 6800) vs 10.3 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) — the Radeon RX 6800 offers 269.9% better value. The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6800 | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $579-71% | $1999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 38.1+270% | 10.3 |
| Codename | Navi 21 | AD104 |
| Release | October 28 2020 | March 21 2023 |
| Ranking | #65 | #71 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












