RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs RTX A4500

NVIDIA

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

2023Core: 720 MHzBoost: 1560 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
NVIDIA

RTX A4500

2021Core: 1050 MHzBoost: 1650 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

2023

Why buy it

  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
  • More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
  • Draws 70W instead of 200W, a 130W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than RTX A4500 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (192 vs 224), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
  • 17.7% HIGHER MSRP
    $1,999 MSRPvs$1,699 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.3 vs 12.4 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $1,699 MSRP).

RTX A4500

2021

Why buy it

  • 12.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $300 less on MSRP ($1,699 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
  • Delivers 20.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.4 vs 10.3 G3D/$ ($1,699 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
  • 16.7% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (224 vs 192).

Trade-offs

  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
  • Weaker long-term outlook: RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
  • 185.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 70W.

Quick Answers

So, is RTX A4500 better than RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation?
Yes. RTX A4500 is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 12.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data, 2.1% higher PassMark G3D performance, and 224 vs 192 Tensor cores. It also comes from 2021 instead of 2023, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2021, better upscaling support with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 5nm process instead of 8nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
RTX A4500 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. RTX A4500 is about $300 cheaper on MSRP at $1,699 MSRP versus $1,999 MSRP, and you are getting 12.4% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 2.1% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 20.1%. RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is the newer 2023 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture, lower power draw (70W vs 200W), and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.
When does RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation make more sense than RTX A4500?
Yes. RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is excellent for 1080p, very strong for 1440p, and still capable at 4K with sensible settings or upscaling. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (70W vs 200W), future-proofing, and staying closer to $1,999 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of RTX A4500. The trade-off is that RTX A4500 currently gives you 2.1% higher G3D Mark and 12.4% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 20.1%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRTX 4000 SFF Ada GenerationRTX A4500
1080p
low102 FPS104 FPS
medium87 FPS88 FPS
high70 FPS73 FPS
ultra48 FPS51 FPS
1440p
low81 FPS82 FPS
medium68 FPS68 FPS
high49 FPS51 FPS
ultra33 FPS35 FPS
4K
low33 FPS34 FPS
medium30 FPS31 FPS
high22 FPS23 FPS
ultra20 FPS20 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRTX 4000 SFF Ada GenerationRTX A4500
1080p
low268 FPS441 FPS
medium213 FPS377 FPS
high171 FPS299 FPS
ultra148 FPS260 FPS
1440p
low198 FPS332 FPS
medium151 FPS276 FPS
high123 FPS221 FPS
ultra100 FPS184 FPS
4K
low91 FPS166 FPS
medium72 FPS140 FPS
high62 FPS120 FPS
ultra48 FPS96 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRTX 4000 SFF Ada GenerationRTX A4500
1080p
low465 FPS564 FPS
medium404 FPS477 FPS
high341 FPS407 FPS
ultra288 FPS339 FPS
1440p
low339 FPS442 FPS
medium295 FPS372 FPS
high256 FPS323 FPS
ultra208 FPS260 FPS
4K
low229 FPS287 FPS
medium192 FPS237 FPS
high150 FPS190 FPS
ultra113 FPS149 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRTX 4000 SFF Ada GenerationRTX A4500
1080p
low166 FPS174 FPS
medium136 FPS144 FPS
high117 FPS125 FPS
ultra100 FPS109 FPS
1440p
low121 FPS128 FPS
medium102 FPS109 FPS
high89 FPS96 FPS
ultra75 FPS83 FPS
4K
low73 FPS75 FPS
medium61 FPS63 FPS
high48 FPS49 FPS
ultra37 FPS39 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation and RTX A4500

NVIDIA

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 720 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,669 points.

NVIDIA

RTX A4500

The RTX A4500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 23 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1050 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 7168 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 56 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 21,094 points.

Graphics Performance

The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation scores 20,669 and the RTX A4500 reaches 21,094 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX A4500 uses Ampere, both on 5 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 6,144 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 7,168 (RTX A4500). Raw compute: 19.17 TFLOPS (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 23.65 TFLOPS (RTX A4500). Boost clocks: 1560 MHz vs 1650 MHz. Ray tracing: 48 RT cores (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 56 (RTX A4500) with 192 Tensor cores vs 224.

FeatureRTX 4000 SFF Ada GenerationRTX A4500
G3D Mark Score
20,669
21,094+2%
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
Ampere
Process Node
5 nm
8 nm
Shading Units
6144
7168+17%
Compute (TFLOPS)
19.17 TFLOPS
23.65 TFLOPS+23%
Boost Clock
1560 MHz
1650 MHz+6%
ROPs
64
96+50%
TMUs
192
224+17%
L1 Cache
6 MB
7 MB+17%
L2 Cache
48 MB+700%
6 MB
Ray Tracing Cores
48
56+17%
Tensor Cores
192
224+17%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX A4500 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX A4500 supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.

FeatureRTX 4000 SFF Ada GenerationRTX A4500
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
Yes (DLSS 3.5)
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 280 GB/s (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 448 GB/s (RTX A4500) — a 60% advantage for the RTX A4500. Bus width: 160-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 6 MB (RTX A4500) — the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRTX 4000 SFF Ada GenerationRTX A4500
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6 ECC
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
280 GB/s
448 GB/s+60%
Bus Width
160-bit
192-bit+20%
L2 Cache
48 MB+700%
6 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 12.1 (RTX A4500). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureRTX 4000 SFF Ada GenerationRTX A4500
DirectX
12.2
12.1
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 7th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX A4500). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A4500).

FeatureRTX 4000 SFF Ada GenerationRTX A4500
Encoder
8th Gen NVENC (2x)
7th Gen NVENC (2x)
Decoder
5th Gen NVDEC
5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation draws 70W versus the RTX A4500's 200W — a 96.3% difference. The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 450W (RTX A4500). Power connectors: 1x 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.

FeatureRTX 4000 SFF Ada GenerationRTX A4500
TDP
70W-65%
200W
Recommended PSU
750W
450W-40%
Power Connector
1x 8-pin
8-pin
Length
267mm
267mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
80°C
80°C
Perf/Watt
295.3+180%
105.5
💰

Value Analysis

The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation launched at $1999 MSRP, while the RTX A4500 launched at $1699. The RTX A4500 costs 15% less ($300 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 10.3 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 12.4 (RTX A4500) — the RTX A4500 offers 20.4% better value. The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2021).

FeatureRTX 4000 SFF Ada GenerationRTX A4500
MSRP
$1999
$1699-15%
Performance per Dollar
10.3
12.4+20%
Codename
AD104
GA102
Release
March 21 2023
November 23 2021
Ranking
#71
#68