G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,250 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
✅Delivers 493.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 8.0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 130W instead of 280W, a 150W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than TITAN RTX across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (80 vs 576), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.

TITAN RTX

2018

Why buy it

✅96.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅620% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (576 vs 80).
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).

Trade-offs

❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 24 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌
903.6% HIGHER MSRP
$2,499 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.0 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
❌115.4% higher power demand at 280W vs 130W.

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

2022

TITAN RTX

2018

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,250 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
✅Delivers 493.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 8.0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 130W instead of 280W, a 150W reduction.

Why buy it

✅96.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅620% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (576 vs 80).
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than TITAN RTX across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (80 vs 576), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.

Trade-offs

❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 24 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌
903.6% HIGHER MSRP
$2,499 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.0 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
❌115.4% higher power demand at 280W vs 130W.

Quick Answers

So, is TITAN RTX better than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM?

Yes. TITAN RTX is clearly the better overall GPU here. TITAN RTX averages 96.0% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 20,095 vs 11,892 in G3D Mark. On top of that, TITAN RTX is a 2018 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is a 2022 model from an older generation with DLSS Super Resolution. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2022 generation instead of 2018, better upscaling support with DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 8nm process instead of 12nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

TITAN RTX is about 903.6% more expensive on MSRP at $2,499 MSRP versus $249 MSRP, and you are getting 96.0% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 69.0% higher G3D Mark. GeForce RTX 3050 OEM still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, TITAN RTX is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, GeForce RTX 3050 OEM still makes more sense on price alone, but the performance trade-off is much harder to justify by current standards.

When does GeForce RTX 3050 OEM make more sense than TITAN RTX?

Yes. GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (130W vs 280W), future-proofing, and staying closer to $249 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of TITAN RTX. The trade-off is that TITAN RTX currently gives you 69.0% higher G3D Mark and 96.0% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. GeForce RTX 3050 OEM still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Benchmark Check

TITAN RTX Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	TITAN RTX
1080p
low	130 FPS	199 FPS
medium	113 FPS	185 FPS
high	99 FPS	161 FPS
ultra	83 FPS	145 FPS
1440p
low	119 FPS	182 FPS
medium	96 FPS	154 FPS
high	81 FPS	126 FPS
ultra	69 FPS	115 FPS
4K
low	64 FPS	115 FPS
medium	57 FPS	95 FPS
high	39 FPS	73 FPS
ultra	33 FPS	66 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Open TITAN RTX

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	TITAN RTX
1080p
low	239 FPS	493 FPS
medium	206 FPS	427 FPS
high	164 FPS	350 FPS
ultra	128 FPS	296 FPS
1440p
low	163 FPS	333 FPS
medium	135 FPS	280 FPS
high	112 FPS	233 FPS
ultra	92 FPS	188 FPS
4K
low	88 FPS	152 FPS
medium	74 FPS	135 FPS
high	62 FPS	113 FPS
ultra	49 FPS	90 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Open TITAN RTX

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	TITAN RTX
1080p
low	535 FPS	904 FPS
medium	428 FPS	723 FPS
high	357 FPS	603 FPS
ultra	268 FPS	452 FPS
1440p
low	401 FPS	678 FPS
medium	321 FPS	543 FPS
high	268 FPS	452 FPS
ultra	201 FPS	339 FPS
4K
low	268 FPS	452 FPS
medium	214 FPS	362 FPS
high	178 FPS	301 FPS
ultra	134 FPS	226 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Open TITAN RTX

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	TITAN RTX
1080p
low	467 FPS	632 FPS
medium	414 FPS	555 FPS
high	335 FPS	478 FPS
ultra	268 FPS	439 FPS
1440p
low	372 FPS	525 FPS
medium	321 FPS	459 FPS
high	236 FPS	396 FPS
ultra	197 FPS	339 FPS
4K
low	199 FPS	337 FPS
medium	175 FPS	303 FPS
high	150 FPS	282 FPS
ultra	125 FPS	226 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Open TITAN RTX

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and TITAN RTX

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.

TITAN RTX

The TITAN RTX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 18 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1350 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 280W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,095 points. Launch price was $2,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 11,892 versus the TITAN RTX's 20,095 — the TITAN RTX leads by 69%. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on Ampere while the TITAN RTX uses Turing, both on 8 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 4,608 (TITAN RTX). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 16.31 TFLOPS (TITAN RTX). Boost clocks: 1755 MHz vs 1770 MHz. Ray tracing: 20 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 72 (TITAN RTX) with 80 Tensor cores vs 576.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	TITAN RTX
G3D Mark Score	11,892	20,095+69%
Architecture	Ampere	Turing
Process Node	8 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	2560	4608+80%
Compute (TFLOPS)	8.986 TFLOPS	16.31 TFLOPS+82%
Boost Clock	1755 MHz	1770 MHz
ROPs	32	96+200%
TMUs	80	288+260%
L1 Cache	2.5 MB	4.5 MB+80%
L2 Cache	2 MB	6 MB+200%
Ray Tracing Cores	20	72+260%
Tensor Cores	80	576+620%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The TITAN RTX supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	TITAN RTX
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the TITAN RTX has 24 GB. The TITAN RTX offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 672 GB/s (TITAN RTX) — a 200% advantage for the TITAN RTX. Bus width: 128-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 6 MB (TITAN RTX) — the TITAN RTX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	TITAN RTX
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	24 GB+200%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	224 GB/s	672 GB/s+200%
Bus Width	128-bit	384-bit+200%
L2 Cache	2 MB	6 MB+200%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 12 Ultimate (TITAN RTX). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	TITAN RTX
DirectX	12.2+2%	12 Ultimate
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs NVENC (7th Gen) (TITAN RTX). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC (4th Gen). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (TITAN RTX).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	TITAN RTX
Encoder	8th Gen NVENC	NVENC (7th Gen)
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	NVDEC (4th Gen)
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM draws 130W versus the TITAN RTX's 280W — a 73.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 650W (TITAN RTX). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 235mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	TITAN RTX
TDP	130W-54%	280W
Recommended PSU	450W-31%	650W
Power Connector	8-pin	2x 8-pin
Length	235mm	267mm
Height	124mm	116mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	75°C-6%	80
Perf/Watt	91.5+27%	71.8

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 MSRP, while the TITAN RTX launched at $2499. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM costs 90% less ($2250 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 47.8 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 8.0 (TITAN RTX) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 497.5% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2018).