
EPYC 8434P
Popular choices:

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 8434P
2023Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 64 MB).
- ✅Draws 200W instead of 350W, a 150W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX across 36 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (66,490 vs 67,561).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 43.8 vs 157.5 PassMark/$ ($1,517 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +26.5% higher average FPS across 36 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $1,088 less on MSRP ($429 MSRP vs $1,517 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 259.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 157.5 vs 43.8 PassMark/$ ($429 MSRP vs $1,517 MSRP).
- ✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 96) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (64 MB vs 128 MB).
- ❌75% higher power demand at 350W vs 200W.
EPYC 8434P
2023Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
2025Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 64 MB).
- ✅Draws 200W instead of 350W, a 150W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +26.5% higher average FPS across 36 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $1,088 less on MSRP ($429 MSRP vs $1,517 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 259.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 157.5 vs 43.8 PassMark/$ ($429 MSRP vs $1,517 MSRP).
- ✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 96) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX across 36 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (66,490 vs 67,561).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 43.8 vs 157.5 PassMark/$ ($1,517 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (64 MB vs 128 MB).
- ❌75% higher power demand at 350W vs 200W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX better than EPYC 8434P?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 8434P | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 297 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 270 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 223 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 188 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 142 FPS | 273 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 224 FPS |
| high | 90 FPS | 174 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 153 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 104 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 8434P | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 419 FPS | 786 FPS |
| medium | 369 FPS | 643 FPS |
| high | 300 FPS | 477 FPS |
| ultra | 236 FPS | 403 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 344 FPS | 647 FPS |
| medium | 311 FPS | 549 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 422 FPS |
| ultra | 199 FPS | 328 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 212 FPS | 363 FPS |
| medium | 195 FPS | 312 FPS |
| high | 163 FPS | 273 FPS |
| ultra | 132 FPS | 230 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 8434P | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 860 FPS | 888 FPS |
| medium | 786 FPS | 705 FPS |
| high | 760 FPS | 622 FPS |
| ultra | 682 FPS | 534 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 663 FPS | 713 FPS |
| medium | 587 FPS | 567 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 489 FPS |
| ultra | 498 FPS | 414 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 435 FPS | 507 FPS |
| medium | 344 FPS | 418 FPS |
| high | 307 FPS | 375 FPS |
| ultra | 250 FPS | 315 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 8434P | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1023 FPS | 1106 FPS |
| medium | 913 FPS | 991 FPS |
| high | 772 FPS | 867 FPS |
| ultra | 651 FPS | 781 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 833 FPS | 860 FPS |
| medium | 712 FPS | 759 FPS |
| high | 598 FPS | 664 FPS |
| ultra | 492 FPS | 576 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 632 FPS |
| medium | 524 FPS | 562 FPS |
| high | 451 FPS | 496 FPS |
| ultra | 376 FPS | 429 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 8434P and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

EPYC 8434P
EPYC 8434P
The EPYC 8434P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 18 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 66,490 points. Launch price was $2,700.


Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 July 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 67,561 points. Launch price was $1,649.
Processing Power
The EPYC 8434P packs 48 cores / 96 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 8434P has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the EPYC 8434P versus 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX — a 54.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX (base: 2.5 GHz vs 4.5 GHz). The EPYC 8434P uses the Siena (2023−2024) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX uses Shimada Peak (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 8434P scores 66,490 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX's 67,561 — a 1.6% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 8434P vs 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX.
| Feature | EPYC 8434P | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 48 / 96+200% | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 3.1 GHz | 5.4 GHz+74% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 4.5 GHz+80% |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total)+100% | 64 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm | 4 nm-20% |
| Architecture | Siena (2023−2024) | Shimada Peak (2025) |
| PassMark | 66,490 | 67,561+2% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 40,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 3,016 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 23,596 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 8434P uses the SP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC 8434P versus DDR5-6400 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX — the EPYC 8434P supports 199.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 1152 — 56% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (EPYC 8434P) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX). PCIe lanes: 96 (EPYC 8434P) vs 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX offers 32 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP6 (EPYC 8434P) and WRX90 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX).
| Feature | EPYC 8434P | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP6 | sTR5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800+95900% | DDR5-6400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 1152 | 2048 GB+186413411% |
| RAM Channels | 6 | 8+33% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 96 | 128+33% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 8434P) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX). Direct competitor: EPYC 8434P rivals Xeon Platinum 8452Y; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX rivals Xeon w7-3555.
| Feature | EPYC 8434P | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | true |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 8434P launched at $1517 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX debuted at $429. On MSRP ($1517 vs $429), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX is $1088 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 8434P delivers 43.8 pts/$ vs 157.5 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX the 112.9% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 8434P | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1517 | $429-72% |
| Performance per Dollar | 43.8 | 157.5+260% |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












