
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 5512U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +26.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌8.7% HIGHER MSRP$1,337 MSRPvs$1,230 MSRP
- ❌51.4% higher power demand at 280W vs 185W.
- ❌Older platform position on sWRX8 with DDR4, while Xeon Gold 5512U moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Xeon Gold 5512U
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $107 less on MSRP ($1,230 MSRP vs $1,337 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 185W instead of 280W, a 95W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of sWRX8 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (60,367 vs 62,261).
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
2020Xeon Gold 5512U
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +26.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $107 less on MSRP ($1,230 MSRP vs $1,337 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 185W instead of 280W, a 95W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of sWRX8 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌8.7% HIGHER MSRP$1,337 MSRPvs$1,230 MSRP
- ❌51.4% higher power demand at 280W vs 185W.
- ❌Older platform position on sWRX8 with DDR4, while Xeon Gold 5512U moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (60,367 vs 62,261).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX better than Xeon Gold 5512U?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | Xeon Gold 5512U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 184 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 126 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 160 FPS | 153 FPS |
| medium | 127 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 73 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 40 FPS | 39 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | Xeon Gold 5512U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 579 FPS | 270 FPS |
| medium | 499 FPS | 241 FPS |
| high | 383 FPS | 200 FPS |
| ultra | 327 FPS | 166 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 485 FPS | 227 FPS |
| medium | 425 FPS | 205 FPS |
| high | 338 FPS | 175 FPS |
| ultra | 274 FPS | 140 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 304 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 202 FPS | 98 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | Xeon Gold 5512U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 681 FPS | 777 FPS |
| medium | 564 FPS | 691 FPS |
| high | 497 FPS | 657 FPS |
| ultra | 425 FPS | 581 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 570 FPS | 672 FPS |
| medium | 479 FPS | 594 FPS |
| high | 424 FPS | 562 FPS |
| ultra | 364 FPS | 503 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 417 FPS | 453 FPS |
| medium | 333 FPS | 370 FPS |
| high | 293 FPS | 335 FPS |
| ultra | 234 FPS | 279 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | Xeon Gold 5512U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1020 FPS | 940 FPS |
| medium | 917 FPS | 841 FPS |
| high | 765 FPS | 726 FPS |
| ultra | 664 FPS | 622 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 802 FPS | 762 FPS |
| medium | 701 FPS | 666 FPS |
| high | 584 FPS | 572 FPS |
| ultra | 496 FPS | 484 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 559 FPS | 550 FPS |
| medium | 504 FPS | 493 FPS |
| high | 437 FPS | 435 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 372 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX and Xeon Gold 5512U


Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2020-07-14. It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 62,261 points. Launch price was $4,499.

Xeon Gold 5512U
Xeon Gold 5512U
The Xeon Gold 5512U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 52.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 185 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 60,367 points. Launch price was $1,230.
Processing Power
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Xeon Gold 5512U offers 28 cores / 56 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5512U — a 12.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX uses the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon Gold 5512U uses Emerald Rapids (2023) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX scores 62,261 against the Xeon Gold 5512U's 60,367 — a 3.1% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX. L3 cache: 128 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX vs 52.5 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 5512U.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | Xeon Gold 5512U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64+14% | 28 / 56 |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz+14% | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+67% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB+144% | 52.5 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (2019−2020) | Emerald Rapids (2023) |
| PassMark | 62,261+3% | 60,367 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 42,986 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,260 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 25,211 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX uses the sWRX8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 5512U uses LGA4677 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX versus 4800 on the Xeon Gold 5512U — the Xeon Gold 5512U supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 5512U supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 2048 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX) vs 80 (Xeon Gold 5512U) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX) and C741 (Xeon Gold 5512U).
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | Xeon Gold 5512U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | sWRX8 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | 4800+119900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2048 GB+52428700% | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+60% | 80 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon Gold 5512U supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 5512U). Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX rivals Xeon W-3375; Xeon Gold 5512U rivals EPYC 9354.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | Xeon Gold 5512U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX launched at $1337 MSRP, while the Xeon Gold 5512U debuted at $1230. On MSRP ($1337 vs $1230), the Xeon Gold 5512U is $107 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX delivers 46.6 pts/$ vs 49.1 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 5512U — making the Xeon Gold 5512U the 5.3% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | Xeon Gold 5512U |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1337 | $1230-8% |
| Performance per Dollar | 46.6 | 49.1+5% |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












