
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 6354
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
2020Why buy it
- ✅+64.1% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 39 MB).
- ✅Costs $1,729 less on MSRP ($1,149 MSRP vs $2,878 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 153.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 34.8 vs 13.7 PassMark/$ ($1,149 MSRP vs $2,878 MSRP).
- ✅100% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 64) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌36.6% higher power demand at 280W vs 205W.
Xeon Gold 6354
2021Why buy it
- ✅Draws 205W instead of 280W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (39,400 vs 39,929).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (39 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.7 vs 34.8 PassMark/$ ($2,878 MSRP vs $1,149 MSRP).
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
2020Xeon Gold 6354
2021Why buy it
- ✅+64.1% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 39 MB).
- ✅Costs $1,729 less on MSRP ($1,149 MSRP vs $2,878 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 153.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 34.8 vs 13.7 PassMark/$ ($1,149 MSRP vs $2,878 MSRP).
- ✅100% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 64) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 205W instead of 280W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌36.6% higher power demand at 280W vs 205W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (39,400 vs 39,929).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (39 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.7 vs 34.8 PassMark/$ ($2,878 MSRP vs $1,149 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX better than Xeon Gold 6354?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX | Xeon Gold 6354 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 210 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 170 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 186 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 147 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX | Xeon Gold 6354 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 557 FPS | 415 FPS |
| medium | 486 FPS | 364 FPS |
| high | 395 FPS | 296 FPS |
| ultra | 351 FPS | 237 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 479 FPS | 355 FPS |
| medium | 424 FPS | 317 FPS |
| high | 356 FPS | 265 FPS |
| ultra | 296 FPS | 204 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 220 FPS |
| medium | 268 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 243 FPS | 169 FPS |
| ultra | 217 FPS | 136 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX | Xeon Gold 6354 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 773 FPS | 984 FPS |
| medium | 638 FPS | 856 FPS |
| high | 569 FPS | 810 FPS |
| ultra | 494 FPS | 719 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 784 FPS |
| medium | 495 FPS | 673 FPS |
| high | 437 FPS | 637 FPS |
| ultra | 376 FPS | 567 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 431 FPS | 503 FPS |
| medium | 344 FPS | 395 FPS |
| high | 303 FPS | 352 FPS |
| ultra | 243 FPS | 288 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX | Xeon Gold 6354 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 998 FPS | 985 FPS |
| medium | 970 FPS | 918 FPS |
| high | 823 FPS | 790 FPS |
| ultra | 725 FPS | 669 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 847 FPS | 818 FPS |
| medium | 745 FPS | 703 FPS |
| high | 630 FPS | 601 FPS |
| ultra | 540 FPS | 506 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 594 FPS | 593 FPS |
| medium | 540 FPS | 516 FPS |
| high | 468 FPS | 451 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 383 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX and Xeon Gold 6354


Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Castle Peak (2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 39,929 points. Launch price was $1,149.

Xeon Gold 6354
Xeon Gold 6354
The Xeon Gold 6354 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 39 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 39,400 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6354 offers 18 cores / 36 threads — the Xeon Gold 6354 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6354 — a 17.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX (base: 3.9 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX uses the Castle Peak (2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6354 uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX scores 39,929 against the Xeon Gold 6354's 39,400 — a 1.3% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX. L3 cache: 64 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX vs 39 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 6354.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX | Xeon Gold 6354 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 18 / 36+13% |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz+19% | 3.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.9 GHz+30% | 3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB+64% | 39 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-30% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Castle Peak (2020) | Ice Lake-SP (2021) |
| PassMark | 39,929+1% | 39,400 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX uses the sWRX8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6354 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 3200 memory speed. The Xeon Gold 6354 supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 2048 — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX) vs 64 (Xeon Gold 6354) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX) and C621A (Xeon Gold 6354).
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX | Xeon Gold 6354 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | sWRX8 | LGA4189 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200 | 3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2048 | 6144+200% |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+100% | 64 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6354). Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX rivals Xeon Silver 4314; Xeon Gold 6354 rivals EPYC 7453.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX | Xeon Gold 6354 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX launched at $1149 MSRP, while the Xeon Gold 6354 debuted at $2878. On MSRP ($1149 vs $2878), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is $1729 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX delivers 34.8 pts/$ vs 13.7 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6354 — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX the 87% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX | Xeon Gold 6354 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1149-60% | $2878 |
| Performance per Dollar | 34.8+154% | 13.7 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2021 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












