
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 6258R
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
2020Why buy it
- ✅+66.2% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 39 MB).
- ✅Costs $2,801 less on MSRP ($1,149 MSRP vs $3,950 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 239.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 34.8 vs 10.2 PassMark/$ ($1,149 MSRP vs $3,950 MSRP).
- ✅166.7% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 48) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6258R across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (39,929 vs 40,442).
- ❌36.6% higher power demand at 280W vs 205W.
Xeon Gold 6258R
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.2% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 205W instead of 280W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (39 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.2 vs 34.8 PassMark/$ ($3,950 MSRP vs $1,149 MSRP).
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
2020Xeon Gold 6258R
2020Why buy it
- ✅+66.2% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 39 MB).
- ✅Costs $2,801 less on MSRP ($1,149 MSRP vs $3,950 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 239.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 34.8 vs 10.2 PassMark/$ ($1,149 MSRP vs $3,950 MSRP).
- ✅166.7% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 48) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.2% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 205W instead of 280W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6258R across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (39,929 vs 40,442).
- ❌36.6% higher power demand at 280W vs 205W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (39 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.2 vs 34.8 PassMark/$ ($3,950 MSRP vs $1,149 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Gold 6258R better than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX | Xeon Gold 6258R |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 210 FPS | 196 FPS |
| medium | 170 FPS | 158 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 186 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 147 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX | Xeon Gold 6258R |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 557 FPS | 444 FPS |
| medium | 486 FPS | 388 FPS |
| high | 395 FPS | 317 FPS |
| ultra | 351 FPS | 262 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 479 FPS | 383 FPS |
| medium | 424 FPS | 338 FPS |
| high | 356 FPS | 279 FPS |
| ultra | 296 FPS | 223 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 240 FPS |
| medium | 268 FPS | 213 FPS |
| high | 243 FPS | 189 FPS |
| ultra | 217 FPS | 156 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX | Xeon Gold 6258R |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 773 FPS | 1011 FPS |
| medium | 638 FPS | 920 FPS |
| high | 569 FPS | 864 FPS |
| ultra | 494 FPS | 782 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 801 FPS |
| medium | 495 FPS | 709 FPS |
| high | 437 FPS | 666 FPS |
| ultra | 376 FPS | 597 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 431 FPS | 517 FPS |
| medium | 344 FPS | 425 FPS |
| high | 303 FPS | 373 FPS |
| ultra | 243 FPS | 306 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX | Xeon Gold 6258R |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 998 FPS | 1011 FPS |
| medium | 970 FPS | 975 FPS |
| high | 823 FPS | 828 FPS |
| ultra | 725 FPS | 702 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 847 FPS | 880 FPS |
| medium | 745 FPS | 761 FPS |
| high | 630 FPS | 643 FPS |
| ultra | 540 FPS | 542 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 594 FPS | 645 FPS |
| medium | 540 FPS | 563 FPS |
| high | 468 FPS | 487 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 407 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX and Xeon Gold 6258R


Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Castle Peak (2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 39,929 points. Launch price was $1,149.

Xeon Gold 6258R
Xeon Gold 6258R
The Xeon Gold 6258R is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 38.5 MB. L2 cache: 28 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 40,442 points. Launch price was $3,950.
Processing Power
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6258R offers 28 cores / 56 threads — the Xeon Gold 6258R has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6258R — a 7.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX (base: 3.9 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX uses the Castle Peak (2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6258R uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX scores 39,929 against the Xeon Gold 6258R's 40,442 — a 1.3% lead for the Xeon Gold 6258R. L3 cache: 64 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX vs 38.5 MB on the Xeon Gold 6258R.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX | Xeon Gold 6258R |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 28 / 56+75% |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz+7% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.9 GHz+44% | 2.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB+66% | 38.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 28 MB+5500% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Castle Peak (2020) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 39,929 | 40,442+1% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX uses the sWRX8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6258R uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX versus 2933 on the Xeon Gold 6258R — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX supports 8.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX supports up to 2048 of RAM compared to 1024 — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX) vs 6 (Xeon Gold 6258R). PCIe lanes: 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX) vs 48 (Xeon Gold 6258R) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX offers 80 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX) and LGA3647 (Xeon Gold 6258R).
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX | Xeon Gold 6258R |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | sWRX8 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200+9% | 2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2048+100% | 1024 |
| RAM Channels | 8+33% | 6 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+167% | 48 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6258R). Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX rivals Xeon Silver 4314; Xeon Gold 6258R rivals EPYC 7502.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX | Xeon Gold 6258R |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX launched at $1149 MSRP, while the Xeon Gold 6258R debuted at $3950. On MSRP ($1149 vs $3950), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is $2801 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX delivers 34.8 pts/$ vs 10.2 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6258R — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX the 109% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX | Xeon Gold 6258R |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1149-71% | $3950 |
| Performance per Dollar | 34.8+241% | 10.2 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












