
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
Popular choices:

Xeon 6505P
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
2020Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 48 MB).
- ✅45.5% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 88) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 34.8 vs 69.9 PassMark/$ ($1,149 MSRP vs $563 MSRP).
- ❌86.7% higher power demand at 280W vs 150W.
- ❌Older platform position on sWRX8 with DDR4, while Xeon 6505P moves to LGA4710 and DDR5.
Xeon 6505P
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $586 less on MSRP ($563 MSRP vs $1,149 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 101.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 69.9 vs 34.8 PassMark/$ ($563 MSRP vs $1,149 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 280W, a 130W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4710 with DDR5 support instead of sWRX8 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (39,341 vs 39,929).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (48 MB vs 64 MB).
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
2020Xeon 6505P
2025Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 48 MB).
- ✅45.5% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 88) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $586 less on MSRP ($563 MSRP vs $1,149 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 101.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 69.9 vs 34.8 PassMark/$ ($563 MSRP vs $1,149 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 280W, a 130W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4710 with DDR5 support instead of sWRX8 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 34.8 vs 69.9 PassMark/$ ($1,149 MSRP vs $563 MSRP).
- ❌86.7% higher power demand at 280W vs 150W.
- ❌Older platform position on sWRX8 with DDR4, while Xeon 6505P moves to LGA4710 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (39,341 vs 39,929).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (48 MB vs 64 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX better than Xeon 6505P?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX | Xeon 6505P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 210 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 170 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 186 FPS | 153 FPS |
| medium | 147 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX | Xeon 6505P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 557 FPS | 292 FPS |
| medium | 486 FPS | 261 FPS |
| high | 395 FPS | 216 FPS |
| ultra | 351 FPS | 192 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 479 FPS | 252 FPS |
| medium | 424 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 356 FPS | 194 FPS |
| ultra | 296 FPS | 161 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 158 FPS |
| medium | 268 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 243 FPS | 134 FPS |
| ultra | 217 FPS | 120 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX | Xeon 6505P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 773 FPS | 984 FPS |
| medium | 638 FPS | 947 FPS |
| high | 569 FPS | 875 FPS |
| ultra | 494 FPS | 792 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 810 FPS |
| medium | 495 FPS | 719 FPS |
| high | 437 FPS | 663 FPS |
| ultra | 376 FPS | 595 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 431 FPS | 511 FPS |
| medium | 344 FPS | 421 FPS |
| high | 303 FPS | 371 FPS |
| ultra | 243 FPS | 304 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX | Xeon 6505P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 998 FPS | 927 FPS |
| medium | 970 FPS | 838 FPS |
| high | 823 FPS | 722 FPS |
| ultra | 725 FPS | 626 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 847 FPS | 718 FPS |
| medium | 745 FPS | 632 FPS |
| high | 630 FPS | 541 FPS |
| ultra | 540 FPS | 469 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 594 FPS | 523 FPS |
| medium | 540 FPS | 467 FPS |
| high | 468 FPS | 410 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 353 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX and Xeon 6505P


Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Castle Peak (2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 39,929 points. Launch price was $1,149.

Xeon 6505P
Xeon 6505P
The Xeon 6505P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 48 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 39,341 points. Launch price was $563.
Processing Power
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon 6505P offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX versus 4.1 GHz on the Xeon 6505P — a 4.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX (base: 3.9 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX uses the Castle Peak (2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon 6505P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX scores 39,929 against the Xeon 6505P's 39,341 — a 1.5% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX. L3 cache: 64 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX vs 48 MB (total) on the Xeon 6505P.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX | Xeon 6505P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32+33% | 12 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz+5% | 4.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.9 GHz+77% | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB+33% | 48 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | Intel 3 nm-57% |
| Architecture | Castle Peak (2020) | Granite Rapids (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 39,929+1% | 39,341 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX uses the sWRX8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon 6505P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX versus 6400 on the Xeon 6505P — the Xeon 6505P supports 66.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon 6505P supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 2048 — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX) vs 88 (Xeon 6505P) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX) and LGA4710 (Xeon 6505P).
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX | Xeon 6505P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | sWRX8 | LGA4710 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200 | 6400+100% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2048 | 4096+100% |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+45% | 88 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon 6505P). Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX rivals Xeon Silver 4314; Xeon 6505P rivals EPYC 9334.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX | Xeon 6505P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX launched at $1149 MSRP, while the Xeon 6505P debuted at $563. On MSRP ($1149 vs $563), the Xeon 6505P is $586 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX delivers 34.8 pts/$ vs 69.9 pts/$ for the Xeon 6505P — making the Xeon 6505P the 67.1% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX | Xeon 6505P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1149 | $563-51% |
| Performance per Dollar | 34.8 | 69.9+101% |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












