PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +15.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 45W instead of 180W, a 135W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 780M, while Ryzen Threadripper 2950X needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (15,930 vs 21,444).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.

Ryzen Threadripper 2950X

2018

Why buy it

✅+34.6% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅220% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $899 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌300% higher power demand at 180W vs 45W.
❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS moves to FP7 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS

2024

Ryzen Threadripper 2950X

2018

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +15.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 45W instead of 180W, a 135W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 780M, while Ryzen Threadripper 2950X needs a discrete GPU.

Why buy it

✅+34.6% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅220% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (15,930 vs 21,444).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $899 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌300% higher power demand at 180W vs 45W.
❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS moves to FP7 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS better than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Ryzen Threadripper 2950X makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is the better fit. You are getting 34.6% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen Threadripper 2950X makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $899 MSRP, and it gives you a 15.6% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 34.6% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (32.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2018), a healthier platform with FP7 and DDR5 instead of TR4, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS Benchmark Check

Ryzen Threadripper 2950X Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS	Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
1080p
low	266 FPS	200 FPS
medium	240 FPS	175 FPS
high	205 FPS	143 FPS
ultra	176 FPS	115 FPS
1440p
low	233 FPS	157 FPS
medium	190 FPS	131 FPS
high	157 FPS	106 FPS
ultra	138 FPS	86 FPS
4K
low	158 FPS	83 FPS
medium	131 FPS	74 FPS
high	101 FPS	59 FPS
ultra	88 FPS	46 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS Open Ryzen Threadripper 2950X

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS	Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
1080p
low	487 FPS	532 FPS
medium	405 FPS	463 FPS
high	349 FPS	395 FPS
ultra	310 FPS	351 FPS
1440p
low	427 FPS	471 FPS
medium	374 FPS	417 FPS
high	322 FPS	359 FPS
ultra	273 FPS	307 FPS
4K
low	283 FPS	302 FPS
medium	259 FPS	267 FPS
high	244 FPS	247 FPS
ultra	209 FPS	213 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS Open Ryzen Threadripper 2950X

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS	Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
1080p
low	727 FPS	737 FPS
medium	727 FPS	630 FPS
high	727 FPS	584 FPS
ultra	649 FPS	509 FPS
1440p
low	727 FPS	632 FPS
medium	636 FPS	525 FPS
high	547 FPS	471 FPS
ultra	463 FPS	410 FPS
4K
low	530 FPS	461 FPS
medium	459 FPS	371 FPS
high	408 FPS	332 FPS
ultra	343 FPS	274 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS Open Ryzen Threadripper 2950X

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS	Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
1080p
low	727 FPS	737 FPS
medium	727 FPS	737 FPS
high	727 FPS	714 FPS
ultra	727 FPS	636 FPS
1440p
low	727 FPS	737 FPS
medium	727 FPS	667 FPS
high	716 FPS	570 FPS
ultra	631 FPS	500 FPS
4K
low	619 FPS	515 FPS
medium	553 FPS	468 FPS
high	496 FPS	415 FPS
ultra	434 FPS	364 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS Open Ryzen Threadripper 2950X

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS and Ryzen Threadripper 2950X

Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS

The Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 29,088 points. Launch price was $299.

Ryzen Threadripper 2950X

The Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 August 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the ZEN+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 29,462 points. Launch price was $899.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X — a 14.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS (base: 3.8 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS uses the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X uses ZEN+ (2018−2019) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS scores 29,088 against the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X's 29,462 — a 1.3% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 15,930 vs 21,444 (29.5% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,332 vs 1,255, a 60.1% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,037 vs 8,814 (22.4% advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS). L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS vs 32 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X.

Feature	Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS	Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	16 / 32+100%
Boost Clock	5.1 GHz+16%	4.4 GHz
Base Clock	3.8 GHz+9%	3.5 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)	32 MB+100%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)+100%	512K (per core)
Process	4 nm-67%	12 nm
Architecture	Hawk Point (2024−2025)	ZEN+ (2018−2019)
PassMark	29,088	29,462+1%
Cinebench R23 Multi	15,930	21,444+35%
Geekbench 6 Single	2,332+86%	1,255
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,037+25%	8,814

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS uses the FP7 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X uses TR4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS versus DDR4-2933 on the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X — the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 256 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS) vs 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 2950X). PCIe lanes: 20 (Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS) vs 64 (Ryzen Threadripper 2950X) — the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X offers 44 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FP7,FP7r2,FP8 (Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS) and Socket TR4 / X399 (Ryzen Threadripper 2950X).

Feature	Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS	Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
Socket	FP7	TR4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600+25%	DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity	256 GB	256 GB
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	64+220%

🔧

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SVM (Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS) vs AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper 2950X). The Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS includes integrated graphics (Radeon 780M), while the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS targets Enterprise Performance Laptop. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS rivals Core i7-13700H.