
Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS
Popular choices:

Xeon Silver 4510T
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +49.4% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 115W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 780M, while Xeon Silver 4510T needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (15,930 vs 16,000).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 30 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Silver 4510T, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads and 80 PCIe lanes.
Xeon Silver 4510T
2023Why buy it
- ✅+0.4% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅+87.5% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads, plus 80 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅300% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌155.6% higher power demand at 115W vs 45W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS
2024Xeon Silver 4510T
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +49.4% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 115W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 780M, while Xeon Silver 4510T needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.4% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅+87.5% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads, plus 80 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅300% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (15,930 vs 16,000).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 30 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Silver 4510T, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads and 80 PCIe lanes.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌155.6% higher power demand at 115W vs 45W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS better than Xeon Silver 4510T?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS | Xeon Silver 4510T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 266 FPS | 175 FPS |
| medium | 240 FPS | 141 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 233 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 190 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 157 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS | Xeon Silver 4510T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 487 FPS | 234 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 206 FPS |
| high | 349 FPS | 172 FPS |
| ultra | 310 FPS | 145 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 427 FPS | 197 FPS |
| medium | 374 FPS | 180 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 273 FPS | 128 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 283 FPS | 128 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 244 FPS | 107 FPS |
| ultra | 209 FPS | 89 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS | Xeon Silver 4510T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 727 FPS | 728 FPS |
| medium | 727 FPS | 728 FPS |
| high | 727 FPS | 728 FPS |
| ultra | 649 FPS | 682 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 727 FPS | 728 FPS |
| medium | 636 FPS | 634 FPS |
| high | 547 FPS | 601 FPS |
| ultra | 463 FPS | 531 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 475 FPS |
| medium | 459 FPS | 373 FPS |
| high | 408 FPS | 332 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 270 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS | Xeon Silver 4510T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 727 FPS | 728 FPS |
| medium | 727 FPS | 728 FPS |
| high | 727 FPS | 666 FPS |
| ultra | 727 FPS | 575 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 727 FPS | 674 FPS |
| medium | 727 FPS | 590 FPS |
| high | 716 FPS | 508 FPS |
| ultra | 631 FPS | 436 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 619 FPS | 464 FPS |
| medium | 553 FPS | 416 FPS |
| high | 496 FPS | 371 FPS |
| ultra | 434 FPS | 323 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS and Xeon Silver 4510T


Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS
Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS
The Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 29,088 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon Silver 4510T
Xeon Silver 4510T
The Xeon Silver 4510T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR5 @ 4400 MT/s (1 DPC &2DPC). Passmark benchmark score: 29,119 points. Launch price was $624.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Silver 4510T offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon Silver 4510T has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4510T — a 31.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS uses the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4510T uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS scores 29,088 against the Xeon Silver 4510T's 29,119 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon Silver 4510T. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 15,930 vs 16,000 (0.4% advantage for the Xeon Silver 4510T). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,332 vs 1,800, a 25.8% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,037 vs 11,000 (0.3% advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS). L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS vs 30 MB (total) on the Xeon Silver 4510T.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS | Xeon Silver 4510T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 12 / 24+50% |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+38% | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+90% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 30 MB (total)+88% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 4 nm-43% | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Hawk Point (2024−2025) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 29,088 | 29,119 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 15,930 | 16,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,332+30% | 1,800 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,037 | 11,000 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS uses the FP7 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Silver 4510T uses LGA4677 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. The Xeon Silver 4510T supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 256 GB — 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS) vs 8 (Xeon Silver 4510T). PCIe lanes: 20 (Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS) vs 80 (Xeon Silver 4510T) — the Xeon Silver 4510T offers 60 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FP7,FP7r2,FP8 (Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS) and C741 (Xeon Silver 4510T).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS | Xeon Silver 4510T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP7 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | DDR5-4400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB | 4096 GB+1500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 80+300% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SVM (Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon Silver 4510T). The Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS includes integrated graphics (Radeon 780M), while the Xeon Silver 4510T requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS targets Enterprise Performance Laptop, Xeon Silver 4510T targets Enterprise Storage / Edge Computing. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS rivals Core i7-13700H; Xeon Silver 4510T rivals EPYC 8124.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS | Xeon Silver 4510T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon 780M | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SVM | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Enterprise Performance Laptop | Enterprise Storage / Edge Computing |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











