
Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS
Popular choices:

Xeon Silver 4314
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +31.5% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 135W, a 90W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 780M, while Xeon Silver 4314 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (29,088 vs 29,095).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Silver 4314, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
Xeon Silver 4314
2021Why buy it
- ✅+0% higher PassMark.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅220% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $395 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌200% higher power demand at 135W vs 45W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS moves to FP7 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS
2024Xeon Silver 4314
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +31.5% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 135W, a 90W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 780M, while Xeon Silver 4314 needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅+0% higher PassMark.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅220% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (29,088 vs 29,095).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Silver 4314, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $395 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌200% higher power demand at 135W vs 45W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS moves to FP7 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS better than Xeon Silver 4314?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS | Xeon Silver 4314 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 266 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 240 FPS | 138 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 233 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 190 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 157 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS | Xeon Silver 4314 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 487 FPS | 370 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 321 FPS |
| high | 349 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 310 FPS | 218 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 427 FPS | 318 FPS |
| medium | 374 FPS | 285 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 243 FPS |
| ultra | 273 FPS | 194 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 283 FPS | 205 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 186 FPS |
| high | 244 FPS | 159 FPS |
| ultra | 209 FPS | 127 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS | Xeon Silver 4314 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 727 FPS | 727 FPS |
| medium | 727 FPS | 727 FPS |
| high | 727 FPS | 727 FPS |
| ultra | 649 FPS | 672 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 727 FPS | 727 FPS |
| medium | 636 FPS | 633 FPS |
| high | 547 FPS | 595 FPS |
| ultra | 463 FPS | 526 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 475 FPS |
| medium | 459 FPS | 372 FPS |
| high | 408 FPS | 329 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 267 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS | Xeon Silver 4314 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 727 FPS | 727 FPS |
| medium | 727 FPS | 727 FPS |
| high | 727 FPS | 661 FPS |
| ultra | 727 FPS | 568 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 727 FPS | 672 FPS |
| medium | 727 FPS | 587 FPS |
| high | 716 FPS | 506 FPS |
| ultra | 631 FPS | 434 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 619 FPS | 462 FPS |
| medium | 553 FPS | 415 FPS |
| high | 496 FPS | 370 FPS |
| ultra | 434 FPS | 323 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS and Xeon Silver 4314


Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS
Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS
The Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 29,088 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon Silver 4314
Xeon Silver 4314
The Xeon Silver 4314 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2667. Passmark benchmark score: 29,095 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Silver 4314 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon Silver 4314 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4314 — a 40% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS uses the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4314 uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS scores 29,088 against the Xeon Silver 4314's 29,095 — a 0% lead for the Xeon Silver 4314. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS vs 24 MB (total) on the Xeon Silver 4314.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS | Xeon Silver 4314 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 16 / 32+100% |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+50% | 3.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+58% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 24 MB (total)+50% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-60% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Hawk Point (2024−2025) | Ice Lake-SP (2021) |
| PassMark | 29,088 | 29,095 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 15,930 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,332 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,037 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS uses the FP7 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Silver 4314 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS versus 2667 on the Xeon Silver 4314 — the Xeon Silver 4314 supports 199.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Silver 4314 supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 256 GB — 184% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS) vs 8 (Xeon Silver 4314). PCIe lanes: 20 (Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS) vs 64 (Xeon Silver 4314) — the Xeon Silver 4314 offers 44 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FP7,FP7r2,FP8 (Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS) and C621A (Xeon Silver 4314).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS | Xeon Silver 4314 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP7 | LGA4189 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | 2667+53240% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB+4368967% | 6144 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 64+220% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SVM (Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Silver 4314). The Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS includes integrated graphics (Radeon 780M), while the Xeon Silver 4314 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS targets Enterprise Performance Laptop. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS rivals Core i7-13700H; Xeon Silver 4314 rivals EPYC 7313.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS | Xeon Silver 4314 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon 780M | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SVM | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Enterprise Performance Laptop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











