
Ryzen 5 3600
Popular choices:

Ryzen Threadripper 1920
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $600 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 221.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 88.9 vs 27.6 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 140W, a 75W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen Threadripper 1920.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (17,685 vs 22,066).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 1920, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.
Ryzen Threadripper 1920
2017Why buy it
- ✅+24.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 27.6 vs 88.9 PassMark/$ ($799 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌115.4% higher power demand at 140W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Ryzen Threadripper 1920
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $600 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 221.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 88.9 vs 27.6 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 140W, a 75W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen Threadripper 1920.
Why buy it
- ✅+24.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (17,685 vs 22,066).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 1920, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 27.6 vs 88.9 PassMark/$ ($799 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌115.4% higher power demand at 140W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 3600 better than Ryzen Threadripper 1920?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen Threadripper 1920 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 175 FPS |
| medium | 161 FPS | 156 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 129 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 105 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 154 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen Threadripper 1920 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 398 FPS |
| medium | 404 FPS | 357 FPS |
| high | 332 FPS | 304 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 252 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 420 FPS | 339 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 309 FPS |
| high | 303 FPS | 265 FPS |
| ultra | 263 FPS | 219 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 297 FPS | 217 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 197 FPS |
| high | 230 FPS | 179 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 145 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen Threadripper 1920 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 552 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 539 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 501 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 442 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 552 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 464 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 418 FPS |
| ultra | 432 FPS | 367 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 420 FPS |
| medium | 361 FPS | 334 FPS |
| high | 305 FPS | 303 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 252 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen Threadripper 1920 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 552 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 552 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 552 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 528 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 552 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 552 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 493 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 423 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 444 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 408 FPS |
| high | 413 FPS | 367 FPS |
| ultra | 357 FPS | 318 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 3600 and Ryzen Threadripper 1920


Ryzen 5 3600
Ryzen 5 3600
The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.


Ryzen Threadripper 1920
Ryzen Threadripper 1920
The Ryzen Threadripper 1920 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,066 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 3600 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 versus 3.8 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 — a 10% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 3600 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 3600 scores 17,685 against the Ryzen Threadripper 1920's 22,066 — a 22% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 1920. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600 vs 32 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 1920.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen Threadripper 1920 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 12 / 24+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz+11% | 3.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+12% | 3.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total) | 32 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (2019−2020) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| PassMark | 17,685 | 22,066+25% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 9,500 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,295 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,898 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 uses SP3r2 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen Threadripper 1920 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | SP3r2 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: Yes (Ryzen 5 3600) / not specified (Ryzen Threadripper 1920). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen Threadripper 1920 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | Yes | — |
| Target Use | Gaming/Budget Workstation | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 5 3600 launched at $199 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 debuted at $799. On MSRP ($199 vs $799), the Ryzen 5 3600 is $600 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 3600 delivers 88.9 pts/$ vs 27.6 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 — making the Ryzen 5 3600 the 105.2% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen Threadripper 1920 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199-75% | $799 |
| Performance per Dollar | 88.9+222% | 27.6 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2017 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












