
Ryzen 7 5700X
Popular choices:

Ryzen AI Max PRO 385
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 5700X
2022Why buy it
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 across 31 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (14,000 vs 16,500).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌18.2% higher power demand at 65W vs 55W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 moves to FP11 and DDR5.
Ryzen AI Max PRO 385
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.0% higher average FPS across 31 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 65W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP11 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 8050S, while Ryzen 7 5700X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Ryzen 7 5700X
2022Ryzen AI Max PRO 385
2025Why buy it
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.0% higher average FPS across 31 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 65W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP11 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 8050S, while Ryzen 7 5700X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 across 31 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (14,000 vs 16,500).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌18.2% higher power demand at 65W vs 55W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 moves to FP11 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 better than Ryzen 7 5700X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 277 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 243 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 209 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 179 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 233 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 185 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 153 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 162 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 86 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 649 FPS | 684 FPS |
| medium | 549 FPS | 565 FPS |
| high | 448 FPS | 460 FPS |
| ultra | 404 FPS | 417 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 552 FPS | 591 FPS |
| medium | 484 FPS | 514 FPS |
| high | 407 FPS | 422 FPS |
| ultra | 350 FPS | 360 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 343 FPS | 352 FPS |
| medium | 303 FPS | 311 FPS |
| high | 277 FPS | 286 FPS |
| ultra | 245 FPS | 251 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 665 FPS | 788 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 788 FPS |
| high | 509 FPS | 706 FPS |
| ultra | 439 FPS | 594 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 554 FPS | 788 FPS |
| medium | 458 FPS | 644 FPS |
| high | 419 FPS | 559 FPS |
| ultra | 358 FPS | 472 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 402 FPS | 562 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 459 FPS |
| high | 292 FPS | 408 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 338 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 665 FPS | 788 FPS |
| medium | 665 FPS | 788 FPS |
| high | 665 FPS | 788 FPS |
| ultra | 665 FPS | 781 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 665 FPS | 788 FPS |
| medium | 665 FPS | 768 FPS |
| high | 607 FPS | 673 FPS |
| ultra | 533 FPS | 590 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 609 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 541 FPS |
| high | 439 FPS | 486 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 426 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 5700X and Ryzen AI Max PRO 385


Ryzen 7 5700X
Ryzen 7 5700X
The Ryzen 7 5700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 26,609 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen AI Max PRO 385
Ryzen AI Max PRO 385
The Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Strix Halo (2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP11. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 31,508 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 7 5700X and Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5700X versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 — a 8.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Ryzen 7 5700X uses the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 uses Strix Halo (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 5700X scores 26,609 against the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385's 31,508 — a 16.9% lead for the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 14,000 vs 16,500 (16.4% advantage for the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,116 vs 2,886, a 30.8% lead for the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 9,715 vs 14,136 (37.1% advantage for the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385). Both processors carry 32 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz | 5 GHz+9% |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz | 3.6 GHz+6% |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total) | 32 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) | Strix Halo (2025) |
| PassMark | 26,609 | 31,508+18% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 14,000 | 16,500+18% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,116 | 2,886+36% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 9,715 | 14,136+46% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 5700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 uses FP11 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 5700X versus LPDDR5x-8000 on the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 — the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 5700X) vs 8 (Ryzen AI Max PRO 385). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 5700X) vs 20 (Ryzen AI Max PRO 385) — the Ryzen 7 5700X offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 7 5700X) and Strix Halo platform (Ryzen AI Max PRO 385).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | FP11 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | LPDDR5x-8000+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 24+20% | 20 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support AMD-V virtualization. The Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 includes integrated graphics (Radeon 8050S), while the Ryzen 7 5700X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5700X targets Gaming, Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 targets Enterprise AI Mobile. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 5700X rivals Core i7-11700K; Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 rivals M3 Max.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon 8050S |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Gaming | Enterprise AI Mobile |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












