
Ryzen 7 5700X
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 5700X
2022Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (26,609 vs 26,852).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌712.5% higher power demand at 65W vs 8W.
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 8W instead of 65W, a 57W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
Ryzen 7 5700X
2022Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 8W instead of 65W, a 57W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (26,609 vs 26,852).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌712.5% higher power demand at 65W vs 8W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS better than Ryzen 7 5700X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 269 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 243 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 204 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 176 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 236 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 92 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 649 FPS | 510 FPS |
| medium | 549 FPS | 419 FPS |
| high | 448 FPS | 361 FPS |
| ultra | 404 FPS | 322 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 552 FPS | 446 FPS |
| medium | 484 FPS | 386 FPS |
| high | 407 FPS | 332 FPS |
| ultra | 350 FPS | 283 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 343 FPS | 294 FPS |
| medium | 303 FPS | 266 FPS |
| high | 277 FPS | 251 FPS |
| ultra | 245 FPS | 216 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 665 FPS | 671 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 671 FPS |
| high | 509 FPS | 647 FPS |
| ultra | 439 FPS | 546 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 554 FPS | 671 FPS |
| medium | 458 FPS | 637 FPS |
| high | 419 FPS | 541 FPS |
| ultra | 358 FPS | 464 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 402 FPS | 541 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 473 FPS |
| high | 292 FPS | 419 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 355 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 665 FPS | 671 FPS |
| medium | 665 FPS | 671 FPS |
| high | 665 FPS | 671 FPS |
| ultra | 665 FPS | 671 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 665 FPS | 671 FPS |
| medium | 665 FPS | 671 FPS |
| high | 607 FPS | 660 FPS |
| ultra | 533 FPS | 573 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 572 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 511 FPS |
| high | 439 FPS | 457 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 394 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 5700X and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS


Ryzen 7 5700X
Ryzen 7 5700X
The Ryzen 7 5700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 26,609 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
The Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 MB + 16 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 26,852 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 7 5700X and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5700X versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS — a 10.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Ryzen 7 5700X uses the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS uses Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 5700X scores 26,609 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS's 26,852 — a 0.9% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 5700X vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz | 5.1 GHz+11% |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz | 3.8 GHz+12% |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+100% | 16 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 8 MB+1500% |
| Process | 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) | Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) |
| PassMark | 26,609 | 26,852 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 14,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,116 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 9,715 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 5700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS uses FP7/FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | FP7/FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5700X) / not specified (Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5700X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 5700X rivals Core i7-11700K.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












