
Ryzen 7 5700X
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 5700X
2022Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (26,609 vs 26,864).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS moves to FP7 and DDR5.
Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS
2024Why buy it
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
Ryzen 7 5700X
2022Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS
2024Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (26,609 vs 26,864).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS moves to FP7 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS better than Ryzen 7 5700X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 255 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 235 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 198 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 170 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 227 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 136 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 91 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 649 FPS | 469 FPS |
| medium | 549 FPS | 388 FPS |
| high | 448 FPS | 336 FPS |
| ultra | 404 FPS | 301 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 552 FPS | 410 FPS |
| medium | 484 FPS | 358 FPS |
| high | 407 FPS | 310 FPS |
| ultra | 350 FPS | 265 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 343 FPS | 270 FPS |
| medium | 303 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 277 FPS | 234 FPS |
| ultra | 245 FPS | 202 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 665 FPS | 672 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 672 FPS |
| high | 509 FPS | 672 FPS |
| ultra | 439 FPS | 594 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 554 FPS | 672 FPS |
| medium | 458 FPS | 622 FPS |
| high | 419 FPS | 525 FPS |
| ultra | 358 FPS | 451 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 402 FPS | 521 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 458 FPS |
| high | 292 FPS | 406 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 345 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 665 FPS | 672 FPS |
| medium | 665 FPS | 672 FPS |
| high | 665 FPS | 672 FPS |
| ultra | 665 FPS | 672 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 665 FPS | 672 FPS |
| medium | 665 FPS | 672 FPS |
| high | 607 FPS | 633 FPS |
| ultra | 533 FPS | 548 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 559 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 501 FPS |
| high | 439 FPS | 446 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 384 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 5700X and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS


Ryzen 7 5700X
Ryzen 7 5700X
The Ryzen 7 5700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 26,609 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS
Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS
The Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 26,864 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 7 5700X and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5700X versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS — a 10.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Ryzen 7 5700X uses the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS uses Hawk Point (2024−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 5700X scores 26,609 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS's 26,864 — a 1% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 5700X vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz | 5.1 GHz+11% |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+3% | 3.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+100% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) | Hawk Point (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 26,609 | 26,864 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 14,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,116 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 9,715 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 5700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | FP7 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5700X) / not specified (Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5700X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 5700X rivals Core i7-11700K.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












