
Ryzen 7 5700X
Popular choices:

Xeon E5-2699A v4
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 5700X
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +14.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 145W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (26,609 vs 26,759).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 55 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2699A v4, which brings 22 cores / 44 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2699A v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon E5-2699A v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
- ✅+71.9% larger total L3 cache (55 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 22 cores / 44 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌123.1% higher power demand at 145W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 5700X
2022Xeon E5-2699A v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +14.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 145W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
- ✅+71.9% larger total L3 cache (55 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 22 cores / 44 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (26,609 vs 26,759).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 55 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2699A v4, which brings 22 cores / 44 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2699A v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌123.1% higher power demand at 145W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 5700X better than Xeon E5-2699A v4?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon E5-2699A v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 161 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 102 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 153 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 39 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon E5-2699A v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 649 FPS | 364 FPS |
| medium | 549 FPS | 330 FPS |
| high | 448 FPS | 279 FPS |
| ultra | 404 FPS | 226 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 552 FPS | 313 FPS |
| medium | 484 FPS | 284 FPS |
| high | 407 FPS | 243 FPS |
| ultra | 350 FPS | 190 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 343 FPS | 195 FPS |
| medium | 303 FPS | 178 FPS |
| high | 277 FPS | 153 FPS |
| ultra | 245 FPS | 121 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon E5-2699A v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 665 FPS | 669 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 669 FPS |
| high | 509 FPS | 669 FPS |
| ultra | 439 FPS | 647 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 554 FPS | 669 FPS |
| medium | 458 FPS | 617 FPS |
| high | 419 FPS | 586 FPS |
| ultra | 358 FPS | 530 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 402 FPS | 466 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 380 FPS |
| high | 292 FPS | 345 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 288 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon E5-2699A v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 665 FPS | 669 FPS |
| medium | 665 FPS | 669 FPS |
| high | 665 FPS | 669 FPS |
| ultra | 665 FPS | 663 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 665 FPS | 669 FPS |
| medium | 665 FPS | 669 FPS |
| high | 607 FPS | 637 FPS |
| ultra | 533 FPS | 526 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 633 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 557 FPS |
| high | 439 FPS | 488 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 405 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 5700X and Xeon E5-2699A v4


Ryzen 7 5700X
Ryzen 7 5700X
The Ryzen 7 5700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 26,609 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E5-2699A v4
Xeon E5-2699A v4
The Xeon E5-2699A v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 October 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-EP (2016) architecture. It features 22 cores and 44 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 55 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 145 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 26,759 points. Launch price was $4,938.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 5700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E5-2699A v4 offers 22 cores / 44 threads — the Xeon E5-2699A v4 has 14 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5700X versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-2699A v4 — a 24.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5700X (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Ryzen 7 5700X uses the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon E5-2699A v4 uses Broadwell-EP (2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 5700X scores 26,609 against the Xeon E5-2699A v4's 26,759 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon E5-2699A v4. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 5700X vs 55 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2699A v4.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon E5-2699A v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 22 / 44+175% |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+28% | 3.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+42% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total) | 55 MB (total)+72% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+100% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) | Broadwell-EP (2016) |
| PassMark | 26,609 | 26,759 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 14,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,116 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 9,715 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 5700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2699A v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon E5-2699A v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5700X) / not specified (Xeon E5-2699A v4). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5700X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 5700X rivals Core i7-11700K.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon E5-2699A v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












