
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 6222V
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350
2025Why buy it
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 115W, a 87W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6222V across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (24,044 vs 24,254).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 28 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6222V, which brings 20 cores / 40 threads.
Xeon Gold 6222V
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+243.8% larger total L3 cache (28 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 20 cores / 40 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌310.7% higher power demand at 115W vs 28W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 moves to FP8 and DDR5.
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350
2025Xeon Gold 6222V
2019Why buy it
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 115W, a 87W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+243.8% larger total L3 cache (28 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 20 cores / 40 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6222V across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (24,044 vs 24,254).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 28 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6222V, which brings 20 cores / 40 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌310.7% higher power demand at 115W vs 28W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 moves to FP8 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Gold 6222V better than Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 | Xeon Gold 6222V |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 245 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 228 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 194 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 167 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 215 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 149 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 132 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 149 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 126 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 | Xeon Gold 6222V |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 212 FPS | 189 FPS |
| medium | 183 FPS | 169 FPS |
| high | 166 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 147 FPS | 119 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 190 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 170 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 130 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 105 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 107 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 126 FPS | 87 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 69 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 | Xeon Gold 6222V |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 601 FPS | 606 FPS |
| medium | 595 FPS | 606 FPS |
| high | 512 FPS | 606 FPS |
| ultra | 408 FPS | 606 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 601 FPS | 606 FPS |
| medium | 506 FPS | 605 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 573 FPS |
| ultra | 353 FPS | 506 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 436 FPS | 455 FPS |
| medium | 368 FPS | 357 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 318 FPS |
| ultra | 261 FPS | 259 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 | Xeon Gold 6222V |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 601 FPS | 606 FPS |
| medium | 601 FPS | 606 FPS |
| high | 601 FPS | 606 FPS |
| ultra | 601 FPS | 558 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 601 FPS | 606 FPS |
| medium | 601 FPS | 584 FPS |
| high | 588 FPS | 502 FPS |
| ultra | 506 FPS | 430 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 461 FPS |
| medium | 478 FPS | 412 FPS |
| high | 425 FPS | 367 FPS |
| ultra | 369 FPS | 318 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 and Xeon Gold 6222V


Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350
The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Krackan Point (2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 24,044 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon Gold 6222V
Xeon Gold 6222V
The Xeon Gold 6222V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 27.5 MB. L2 cache: 20 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 24,254 points. Launch price was $1,600.
Processing Power
The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6222V offers 20 cores / 40 threads — the Xeon Gold 6222V has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6222V — a 32.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 (base: 2 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 uses the Krackan Point (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6222V uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 scores 24,044 against the Xeon Gold 6222V's 24,254 — a 0.9% lead for the Xeon Gold 6222V. L3 cache: 8 MB on the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 vs 27.5 MB on the Xeon Gold 6222V.
| Feature | Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 | Xeon Gold 6222V |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 20 / 40+150% |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+39% | 3.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz+11% | 1.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB | 27.5 MB+244% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 20 MB+1900% |
| Process | 4 nm-71% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Krackan Point (2025) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 24,044 | 24,254 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6222V uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 | Xeon Gold 6222V |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP8 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











