Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 vs Xeon Gold 6138

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350

2025

Why buy it

✅Draws 28W instead of 125W, a 97W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6138 across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (24,044 vs 24,108).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 28 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6138, which brings 20 cores / 40 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.

Xeon Gold 6138

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +15.6% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+243.8% larger total L3 cache (28 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 20 cores / 40 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 0.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $2,612 MSRP, while Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌346.4% higher power demand at 125W vs 28W.
❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 moves to FP8 and DDR5.

Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350

2025

Xeon Gold 6138

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 28W instead of 125W, a 97W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +15.6% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+243.8% larger total L3 cache (28 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 20 cores / 40 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 0.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6138 across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (24,044 vs 24,108).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 28 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6138, which brings 20 cores / 40 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $2,612 MSRP, while Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌346.4% higher power demand at 125W vs 28W.
❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 moves to FP8 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Gold 6138 better than Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon Gold 6138 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon Gold 6138 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 15.6% more average FPS across 2 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6138 is the better fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 20 cores and 40 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 243.8% larger total L3 cache (28 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Gold 6138 is the smarter buy today. Xeon Gold 6138 is at an unclear MSRP at $2,612 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 15.6% average FPS lead across 2 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (9.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2017) and a healthier platform with FP8 and DDR5 instead of LGA3647. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 Benchmark Check

Xeon Gold 6138 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350	Xeon Gold 6138
1080p
low	245 FPS	186 FPS
medium	228 FPS	151 FPS
high	194 FPS	123 FPS
ultra	167 FPS	96 FPS
1440p
low	215 FPS	146 FPS
medium	181 FPS	115 FPS
high	149 FPS	92 FPS
ultra	132 FPS	72 FPS
4K
low	149 FPS	68 FPS
medium	126 FPS	57 FPS
high	98 FPS	45 FPS
ultra	85 FPS	36 FPS

Open Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 Open Xeon Gold 6138

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350	Xeon Gold 6138
1080p
low	212 FPS	212 FPS
medium	183 FPS	188 FPS
high	166 FPS	161 FPS
ultra	147 FPS	136 FPS
1440p
low	190 FPS	183 FPS
medium	170 FPS	166 FPS
high	154 FPS	143 FPS
ultra	131 FPS	120 FPS
4K
low	143 FPS	119 FPS
medium	132 FPS	109 FPS
high	126 FPS	99 FPS
ultra	107 FPS	82 FPS

Open Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 Open Xeon Gold 6138

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350	Xeon Gold 6138
1080p
low	601 FPS	603 FPS
medium	595 FPS	603 FPS
high	512 FPS	603 FPS
ultra	408 FPS	603 FPS
1440p
low	601 FPS	603 FPS
medium	506 FPS	603 FPS
high	435 FPS	573 FPS
ultra	353 FPS	506 FPS
4K
low	436 FPS	455 FPS
medium	368 FPS	357 FPS
high	322 FPS	318 FPS
ultra	261 FPS	259 FPS

Open Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 Open Xeon Gold 6138

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350	Xeon Gold 6138
1080p
low	601 FPS	603 FPS
medium	601 FPS	603 FPS
high	601 FPS	603 FPS
ultra	601 FPS	563 FPS
1440p
low	601 FPS	603 FPS
medium	601 FPS	587 FPS
high	588 FPS	505 FPS
ultra	506 FPS	433 FPS
4K
low	530 FPS	462 FPS
medium	478 FPS	414 FPS
high	425 FPS	369 FPS
ultra	369 FPS	320 FPS

Open Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 Open Xeon Gold 6138

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 and Xeon Gold 6138

Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350

The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Krackan Point (2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 24,044 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon Gold 6138

The Xeon Gold 6138 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 27.5 MB. L2 cache: 20 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 24,108 points. Launch price was $2,612.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6138 offers 20 cores / 40 threads — the Xeon Gold 6138 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6138 — a 29.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 (base: 2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 uses the Krackan Point (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6138 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 scores 24,044 against the Xeon Gold 6138's 24,108 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon Gold 6138. L3 cache: 8 MB on the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 vs 27.5 MB on the Xeon Gold 6138.

Feature	Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350	Xeon Gold 6138
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	20 / 40+150%
Boost Clock	5 GHz+35%	3.7 GHz
Base Clock	2 GHz	2 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB	27.5 MB+244%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	20 MB+1900%
Process	4 nm-71%	14 nm
Architecture	Krackan Point (2025)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	24,044	24,108
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,261
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	15,439

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6138 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350	Xeon Gold 6138
Socket	FP8	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity	—	768 GB
RAM Channels	—	6
ECC Support	—	Yes
PCIe Lanes	—	48

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6138). Primary use case: Xeon Gold 6138 targets Server.

Feature	Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350	Xeon Gold 6138
Integrated GPU	—	No
IGPU Model	—	None
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	Yes
Virtualization	—	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	—	Server

💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 launched at $0 MSRP, while the Xeon Gold 6138 debuted at $2612. On MSRP ($0 vs $2612), the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 is $2612 cheaper.