Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 vs Xeon E5-2679 v4

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350

2025

Why buy it

✅Draws 28W instead of 200W, a 172W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011-3 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2679 v4 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (24,044 vs 24,131).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 50 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2679 v4, which brings 20 cores / 40 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.

Xeon E5-2679 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +14.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+525% larger total L3 cache (50 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 20 cores / 40 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 0.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $2,702 MSRP, while Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌614.3% higher power demand at 200W vs 28W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2011-3 with DDR4, while Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 moves to FP8 and DDR5.

Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350

2025

Xeon E5-2679 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅Draws 28W instead of 200W, a 172W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011-3 and DDR4.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +14.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+525% larger total L3 cache (50 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 20 cores / 40 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 0.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2679 v4 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (24,044 vs 24,131).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 50 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2679 v4, which brings 20 cores / 40 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $2,702 MSRP, while Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌614.3% higher power demand at 200W vs 28W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2011-3 with DDR4, while Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 moves to FP8 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2679 v4 better than Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon E5-2679 v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-2679 v4 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 14.3% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2679 v4 is the better fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 20 cores and 40 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 525% larger total L3 cache (50 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-2679 v4 is the smarter buy today. Xeon E5-2679 v4 is at an unclear MSRP at $2,702 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 14.3% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (8.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2016) and a healthier platform with FP8 and DDR5 instead of LGA2011-3. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 Benchmark Check

Xeon E5-2679 v4 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350	Xeon E5-2679 v4
1080p
low	245 FPS	182 FPS
medium	228 FPS	160 FPS
high	194 FPS	126 FPS
ultra	167 FPS	100 FPS
1440p
low	215 FPS	151 FPS
medium	181 FPS	127 FPS
high	149 FPS	96 FPS
ultra	132 FPS	78 FPS
4K
low	149 FPS	70 FPS
medium	126 FPS	62 FPS
high	98 FPS	48 FPS
ultra	85 FPS	39 FPS

Open Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 Open Xeon E5-2679 v4

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350	Xeon E5-2679 v4
1080p
low	212 FPS	364 FPS
medium	183 FPS	331 FPS
high	166 FPS	279 FPS
ultra	147 FPS	224 FPS
1440p
low	190 FPS	313 FPS
medium	170 FPS	284 FPS
high	154 FPS	242 FPS
ultra	131 FPS	188 FPS
4K
low	143 FPS	195 FPS
medium	132 FPS	178 FPS
high	126 FPS	153 FPS
ultra	107 FPS	120 FPS

Open Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 Open Xeon E5-2679 v4

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350	Xeon E5-2679 v4
1080p
low	601 FPS	603 FPS
medium	595 FPS	603 FPS
high	512 FPS	603 FPS
ultra	408 FPS	603 FPS
1440p
low	601 FPS	603 FPS
medium	506 FPS	590 FPS
high	435 FPS	559 FPS
ultra	353 FPS	505 FPS
4K
low	436 FPS	447 FPS
medium	368 FPS	363 FPS
high	322 FPS	328 FPS
ultra	261 FPS	274 FPS

Open Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 Open Xeon E5-2679 v4

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350	Xeon E5-2679 v4
1080p
low	601 FPS	603 FPS
medium	601 FPS	603 FPS
high	601 FPS	603 FPS
ultra	601 FPS	585 FPS
1440p
low	601 FPS	603 FPS
medium	601 FPS	603 FPS
high	588 FPS	545 FPS
ultra	506 FPS	462 FPS
4K
low	530 FPS	527 FPS
medium	478 FPS	472 FPS
high	425 FPS	418 FPS
ultra	369 FPS	359 FPS

Open Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 Open Xeon E5-2679 v4

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 and Xeon E5-2679 v4

Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350

The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Krackan Point (2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 24,044 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E5-2679 v4

The Xeon E5-2679 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 50 MB. L2 cache: 5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011-3. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 24,131 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E5-2679 v4 offers 20 cores / 40 threads — the Xeon E5-2679 v4 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 versus 3.3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2679 v4 — a 41% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 (base: 2 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 uses the Krackan Point (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon E5-2679 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 scores 24,044 against the Xeon E5-2679 v4's 24,131 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon E5-2679 v4. L3 cache: 8 MB on the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 vs 50 MB on the Xeon E5-2679 v4.

Feature	Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350	Xeon E5-2679 v4
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	20 / 40+150%
Boost Clock	5 GHz+52%	3.3 GHz
Base Clock	2 GHz	2.5 GHz+25%
L3 Cache	8 MB	50 MB+525%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	5 MB+400%
Process	4 nm-71%	14 nm
Architecture	Krackan Point (2025)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	24,044	24,131
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,000
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	12,000

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2679 v4 uses LGA2011-3 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350	Xeon E5-2679 v4
Socket	FP8	LGA2011-3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity	—	1536 GB
RAM Channels	—	4
ECC Support	—	Yes
PCIe Lanes	—	40

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350) / Yes (Xeon E5-2679 v4).

Feature	Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350	Xeon E5-2679 v4
Integrated GPU	—	No
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	Yes

💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 launched at $0 MSRP, while the Xeon E5-2679 v4 debuted at $2702. On MSRP ($0 vs $2702), the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 is $2702 cheaper.