PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 9 PRO 5945.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 across 10 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (16,211 vs 23,200).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Ryzen 9 PRO 5945

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +22.8% higher average FPS across 10 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+220% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 20 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Ryzen 9 PRO 5945

2022

Why buy it

✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 9 PRO 5945.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +22.8% higher average FPS across 10 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+220% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 20 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 across 10 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (16,211 vs 23,200).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Trade-offs

❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 better than Core i5-13400F?

Yes. Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 22.8% average FPS lead across 10 shared CPU game tests in our data, 43.1% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, and 38.0% higher PassMark, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 22.8% more average FPS across 10 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 is the better fit. You are getting 43.1% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 220% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 20 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-13400F makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $196 MSRP, and it gives you a 22.8% average FPS lead across 10 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-13400F is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible LGA1700 + DDR5 setup, Core i5-13400F can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap, but on MSRP alone you would want to find it meaningfully cheaper in real-world listings before that path becomes easy to justify.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-13400F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022) and a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of AM4. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-13400F Benchmark Check

Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 9 PRO 5945
1080p
low	171 FPS	164 FPS
medium	158 FPS	136 FPS
high	132 FPS	116 FPS
ultra	112 FPS	97 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	149 FPS
medium	123 FPS	119 FPS
high	99 FPS	97 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	82 FPS
4K
low	81 FPS	83 FPS
medium	74 FPS	72 FPS
high	59 FPS	57 FPS
ultra	46 FPS	46 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Ryzen 9 PRO 5945

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 9 PRO 5945
1080p
low	545 FPS	630 FPS
medium	464 FPS	544 FPS
high	389 FPS	434 FPS
ultra	356 FPS	381 FPS
1440p
low	458 FPS	524 FPS
medium	403 FPS	460 FPS
high	345 FPS	385 FPS
ultra	301 FPS	315 FPS
4K
low	280 FPS	307 FPS
medium	247 FPS	271 FPS
high	231 FPS	249 FPS
ultra	204 FPS	221 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Ryzen 9 PRO 5945

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 9 PRO 5945
1080p
low	530 FPS	845 FPS
medium	449 FPS	670 FPS
high	415 FPS	586 FPS
ultra	375 FPS	494 FPS
1440p
low	490 FPS	676 FPS
medium	422 FPS	535 FPS
high	382 FPS	460 FPS
ultra	343 FPS	387 FPS
4K
low	393 FPS	480 FPS
medium	331 FPS	398 FPS
high	296 FPS	354 FPS
ultra	246 FPS	293 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Ryzen 9 PRO 5945

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 9 PRO 5945
1080p
low	626 FPS	864 FPS
medium	626 FPS	864 FPS
high	626 FPS	836 FPS
ultra	626 FPS	743 FPS
1440p
low	626 FPS	864 FPS
medium	626 FPS	757 FPS
high	598 FPS	661 FPS
ultra	521 FPS	566 FPS
4K
low	535 FPS	626 FPS
medium	492 FPS	557 FPS
high	439 FPS	490 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	423 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Ryzen 9 PRO 5945

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Ryzen 9 PRO 5945

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Ryzen 9 PRO 5945

The Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 34,549 points. Launch price was $499.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 — a 2.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 uses Vermeer (2020−2025) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Ryzen 9 PRO 5945's 34,549 — a 32% lead for the Ryzen 9 PRO 5945. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 16,211 vs 23,200 (35.5% advantage for the Ryzen 9 PRO 5945). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,407 vs 2,175, a 10.1% lead for the Core i5-13400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,408 vs 12,500 (9.1% advantage for the Ryzen 9 PRO 5945). L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 PRO 5945.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 9 PRO 5945
Cores / Threads	10 / 16	12 / 24+20%
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz	4.7 GHz+2%
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	3 GHz+20%
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)	64 MB+220%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+150%	512 kB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	7 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Vermeer (2020−2025)
PassMark	25,029	34,549+38%
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,211	23,200+43%
Geekbench 6 Single	2,407+11%	2,175
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,408	12,500+10%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 — the Core i5-13400F supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and X570,B550,A520,X470,B450 (Ryzen 9 PRO 5945).

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 9 PRO 5945
Socket	LGA1700	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+25%	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB+50%	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) vs AMD-V (SVM) (Ryzen 9 PRO 5945). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming, Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 targets High-end Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600; Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 rivals Core i9-12900.