
Core i5-13400F
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-13400F
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $553 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $749 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 55.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 82.2 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $749 MSRP).
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 9 9955HX3D.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 9955HX3D across 7 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (25,029 vs 61,578).
- ❌18.2% higher power demand at 65W vs 55W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 9955HX3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +34.2% higher average FPS across 7 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 65W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon 610M, while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 82.2 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($749 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.
Core i5-13400F
2023Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $553 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $749 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 55.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 82.2 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $749 MSRP).
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 9 9955HX3D.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +34.2% higher average FPS across 7 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 65W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon 610M, while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 9955HX3D across 7 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (25,029 vs 61,578).
- ❌18.2% higher power demand at 65W vs 55W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 9955HX3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 82.2 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($749 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 9955HX3D better than Core i5-13400F?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen 9 9955HX3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 171 FPS | 287 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 265 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 217 FPS |
| ultra | 112 FPS | 183 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 264 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 221 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 170 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 150 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 153 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 103 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen 9 9955HX3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 698 FPS |
| medium | 464 FPS | 601 FPS |
| high | 389 FPS | 448 FPS |
| ultra | 356 FPS | 376 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 458 FPS | 579 FPS |
| medium | 403 FPS | 517 FPS |
| high | 345 FPS | 398 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 311 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 280 FPS | 325 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 294 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 258 FPS |
| ultra | 204 FPS | 218 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen 9 9955HX3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 851 FPS |
| medium | 449 FPS | 696 FPS |
| high | 415 FPS | 627 FPS |
| ultra | 375 FPS | 539 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 490 FPS | 680 FPS |
| medium | 422 FPS | 557 FPS |
| high | 382 FPS | 490 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 416 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 393 FPS | 484 FPS |
| medium | 331 FPS | 401 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 361 FPS |
| ultra | 246 FPS | 302 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen 9 9955HX3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 626 FPS | 1080 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 976 FPS |
| high | 626 FPS | 854 FPS |
| ultra | 626 FPS | 768 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 626 FPS | 853 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 753 FPS |
| high | 598 FPS | 660 FPS |
| ultra | 521 FPS | 571 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 622 FPS |
| medium | 492 FPS | 557 FPS |
| high | 439 FPS | 494 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 426 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Ryzen 9 9955HX3D

Core i5-13400F
Core i5-13400F
The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.


Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
The Ryzen 9 9955HX3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2025-01-01. It is based on the Fire Range-HX (Zen 5) (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FL1. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 61,578 points. Launch price was $700.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D — a 16% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D uses Fire Range-HX (Zen 5) (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D's 61,578 — a 84.4% lead for the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen 9 9955HX3D |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 16 | 16 / 32+60% |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz | 5.4 GHz+17% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total) | 128 MB (total)+540% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+25% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Fire Range-HX (Zen 5) (2025) |
| PassMark | 25,029 | 61,578+146% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 16,211 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,407 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,408 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D uses FL1 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F versus 5600 on the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D — the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D supports 199.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 96 — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13400F) vs 28 (Ryzen 9 9955HX3D) — the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and FL1 (Ryzen 9 9955HX3D).
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen 9 9955HX3D |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FL1 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | 5600+111900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+209715100% | 96 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 28+40% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen 9 9955HX3D). The Ryzen 9 9955HX3D includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon 610M), while the Core i5-13400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600; Ryzen 9 9955HX3D rivals Core Ultra 9 185H.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen 9 9955HX3D |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | AMD Radeon 610M |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-13400F launched at $196 MSRP, while the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D debuted at $749. On MSRP ($196 vs $749), the Core i5-13400F is $553 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 82.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D — making the Core i5-13400F the 43.3% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen 9 9955HX3D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $196-74% | $749 |
| Performance per Dollar | 127.7+55% | 82.2 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












