PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 9 9900X

2024

Why buy it

✅+940.9% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅Costs $1,990 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $2,489 MSRP).
✅Delivers 395.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 109.3 vs 22.1 PassMark/$ ($499 MSRP vs $2,489 MSRP).
✅Draws 120W instead of 270W, a 150W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 610M, while Xeon w7-3455 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w7-3455 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon w7-3455, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 112 PCIe lanes.

Xeon w7-3455

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +23.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 112 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅366.7% more PCIe lanes (112 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (1,898 vs 19,756).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 22.1 vs 109.3 PassMark/$ ($2,489 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
❌125% higher power demand at 270W vs 120W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 9900X can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Ryzen 9 9900X

2024

Xeon w7-3455

2023

Why buy it

✅+940.9% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅Costs $1,990 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $2,489 MSRP).
✅Delivers 395.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 109.3 vs 22.1 PassMark/$ ($499 MSRP vs $2,489 MSRP).
✅Draws 120W instead of 270W, a 150W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 610M, while Xeon w7-3455 needs a discrete GPU.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +23.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 112 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅366.7% more PCIe lanes (112 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w7-3455 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon w7-3455, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 112 PCIe lanes.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (1,898 vs 19,756).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 22.1 vs 109.3 PassMark/$ ($2,489 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
❌125% higher power demand at 270W vs 120W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 9900X can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 9 9900X better than Xeon w7-3455?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon w7-3455 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 9 9900X is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 9 9900X is the better fit. You are getting 940.9% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 9 9900X is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 9 9900X is $1,990 cheaper on MSRP at $499 MSRP versus $2,489 MSRP, and it gives you 940.9% better Geekbench multi-core. The trade-off is that Xeon w7-3455 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 23.5% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 395.2% better value on MSRP (109.3 vs 22.1 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 9 9900X is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023) and more multi-core headroom with 12 cores / 24 threads instead of 24/48. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 9 9900X Benchmark Check

Xeon w7-3455 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 9 9900X	Xeon w7-3455
1080p
low	287 FPS	311 FPS
medium	259 FPS	301 FPS
high	218 FPS	242 FPS
ultra	190 FPS	204 FPS
1440p
low	270 FPS	270 FPS
medium	218 FPS	233 FPS
high	170 FPS	175 FPS
ultra	152 FPS	154 FPS
4K
low	186 FPS	184 FPS
medium	151 FPS	157 FPS
high	112 FPS	118 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	106 FPS

Open Ryzen 9 9900X Open Xeon w7-3455

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 9 9900X	Xeon w7-3455
1080p
low	772 FPS	682 FPS
medium	625 FPS	593 FPS
high	467 FPS	482 FPS
ultra	393 FPS	427 FPS
1440p
low	635 FPS	551 FPS
medium	534 FPS	489 FPS
high	412 FPS	415 FPS
ultra	321 FPS	341 FPS
4K
low	356 FPS	324 FPS
medium	303 FPS	288 FPS
high	266 FPS	267 FPS
ultra	224 FPS	234 FPS

Open Ryzen 9 9900X Open Xeon w7-3455

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 9 9900X	Xeon w7-3455
1080p
low	899 FPS	1025 FPS
medium	711 FPS	1057 FPS
high	618 FPS	974 FPS
ultra	526 FPS	834 FPS
1440p
low	726 FPS	1002 FPS
medium	577 FPS	888 FPS
high	492 FPS	802 FPS
ultra	418 FPS	656 FPS
4K
low	517 FPS	600 FPS
medium	432 FPS	517 FPS
high	388 FPS	461 FPS
ultra	322 FPS	397 FPS

Open Ryzen 9 9900X Open Xeon w7-3455

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 9 9900X	Xeon w7-3455
1080p
low	1126 FPS	1291 FPS
medium	989 FPS	1015 FPS
high	862 FPS	982 FPS
ultra	766 FPS	850 FPS
1440p
low	891 FPS	1045 FPS
medium	774 FPS	906 FPS
high	677 FPS	782 FPS
ultra	580 FPS	656 FPS
4K
low	644 FPS	778 FPS
medium	569 FPS	679 FPS
high	502 FPS	583 FPS
ultra	433 FPS	437 FPS

Open Ryzen 9 9900X Open Xeon w7-3455

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 9900X and Xeon w7-3455

Ryzen 9 9900X

The Ryzen 9 9900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Granite Ridge (2024−2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.6 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 54,530 points. Launch price was $499.

Xeon w7-3455

The Xeon w7-3455 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 February 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 67.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 54,925 points. Launch price was $2,489.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 9 9900X packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon w7-3455 offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon w7-3455 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.6 GHz on the Ryzen 9 9900X versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w7-3455 — a 15.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 9900X (base: 4.4 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Ryzen 9 9900X uses the Granite Ridge (2024−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon w7-3455 uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 9900X scores 54,530 against the Xeon w7-3455's 54,925 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon w7-3455. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 3,401 vs 1,900, a 56.6% lead for the Ryzen 9 9900X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 19,756 vs 1,898 (164.9% advantage for the Ryzen 9 9900X). L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 9900X vs 67.5 MB on the Xeon w7-3455.

Feature	Ryzen 9 9900X	Xeon w7-3455
Cores / Threads	12 / 24	24 / 48+100%
Boost Clock	5.6 GHz+17%	4.8 GHz
Base Clock	4.4 GHz+76%	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)	67.5 MB+5%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+100%
Process	4 nm-43%	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Granite Ridge (2024−2025)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	54,530	54,925
Cinebench R23 Multi	33,003	—
Geekbench 6 Single	3,401+79%	1,900
Geekbench 6 Multi	19,756+941%	1,898

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 9 9900X uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon w7-3455 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. The Xeon w7-3455 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 256 GB — 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 9 9900X) vs 8 (Xeon w7-3455). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 9 9900X) vs 112 (Xeon w7-3455) — the Xeon w7-3455 offers 88 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A620,B650,X670,X870 (Ryzen 9 9900X) and Intel W790 (Xeon w7-3455).

Feature	Ryzen 9 9900X	Xeon w7-3455
Socket	AM5	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600	DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity	256 GB	4096 GB+1500%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	24	112+367%

🔧

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 9 9900X) vs true (Xeon w7-3455). The Ryzen 9 9900X includes integrated graphics (Radeon 610M), while the Xeon w7-3455 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Xeon w7-3455 rivals Threadripper PRO 7965WX.

Feature	Ryzen 9 9900X	Xeon w7-3455
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Radeon 610M	None
Unlocked	Yes	Yes
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V	true

💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen 9 9900X launched at $499 MSRP, while the Xeon w7-3455 debuted at $2489. On MSRP ($499 vs $2489), the Ryzen 9 9900X is $1990 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 9 9900X delivers 109.3 pts/$ vs 22.1 pts/$ for the Xeon w7-3455 — making the Ryzen 9 9900X the 132.8% better value option.