
Ryzen 9 9900X
Popular choices:

Ryzen AI Max+ 395
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 9 9900X
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +20.3% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅50% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (54,530 vs 55,025).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $499 MSRP, while Ryzen AI Max+ 395 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌118.2% higher power demand at 120W vs 55W.
Ryzen AI Max+ 395
2025Why buy it
- ✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 120W, a 65W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 9900X across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Ryzen 9 9900X
2024Ryzen AI Max+ 395
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +20.3% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅50% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 120W, a 65W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (54,530 vs 55,025).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $499 MSRP, while Ryzen AI Max+ 395 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌118.2% higher power demand at 120W vs 55W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 9900X across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen AI Max+ 395 better than Ryzen 9 9900X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 9900X | Ryzen AI Max+ 395 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 287 FPS | 283 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 257 FPS |
| high | 218 FPS | 211 FPS |
| ultra | 190 FPS | 178 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 261 FPS |
| medium | 218 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 170 FPS | 167 FPS |
| ultra | 152 FPS | 147 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 186 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 151 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 102 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 9900X | Ryzen AI Max+ 395 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 766 FPS | 667 FPS |
| medium | 624 FPS | 575 FPS |
| high | 465 FPS | 433 FPS |
| ultra | 392 FPS | 375 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 629 FPS | 562 FPS |
| medium | 531 FPS | 501 FPS |
| high | 410 FPS | 391 FPS |
| ultra | 319 FPS | 312 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 353 FPS | 317 FPS |
| medium | 301 FPS | 287 FPS |
| high | 265 FPS | 254 FPS |
| ultra | 223 FPS | 218 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 9 9900X | Ryzen AI Max+ 395 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 899 FPS | 776 FPS |
| medium | 711 FPS | 609 FPS |
| high | 618 FPS | 529 FPS |
| ultra | 526 FPS | 447 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 726 FPS | 674 FPS |
| medium | 577 FPS | 536 FPS |
| high | 492 FPS | 462 FPS |
| ultra | 418 FPS | 392 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 517 FPS | 482 FPS |
| medium | 432 FPS | 399 FPS |
| high | 388 FPS | 357 FPS |
| ultra | 322 FPS | 300 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 9 9900X | Ryzen AI Max+ 395 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1126 FPS | 1050 FPS |
| medium | 989 FPS | 947 FPS |
| high | 862 FPS | 827 FPS |
| ultra | 766 FPS | 745 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 891 FPS | 834 FPS |
| medium | 774 FPS | 742 FPS |
| high | 677 FPS | 648 FPS |
| ultra | 580 FPS | 562 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 644 FPS | 613 FPS |
| medium | 569 FPS | 550 FPS |
| high | 502 FPS | 484 FPS |
| ultra | 433 FPS | 418 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 9900X and Ryzen AI Max+ 395


Ryzen 9 9900X
Ryzen 9 9900X
The Ryzen 9 9900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Granite Ridge (2024−2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.6 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 54,530 points. Launch price was $499.


Ryzen AI Max+ 395
Ryzen AI Max+ 395
The Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2025-01-01. It is based on the Strix Halo (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP11. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 55,025 points. Launch price was $450.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 9 9900X packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.6 GHz on the Ryzen 9 9900X versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 — a 9.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 9900X (base: 4.4 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Ryzen 9 9900X uses the Granite Ridge (2024−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 uses Strix Halo (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 9900X scores 54,530 against the Ryzen AI Max+ 395's 55,025 — a 0.9% lead for the Ryzen AI Max+ 395. Both processors carry 64 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 9900X | Ryzen AI Max+ 395 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24 | 16 / 32+33% |
| Boost Clock | 5.6 GHz+10% | 5.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.4 GHz+47% | 3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total) | 64 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Architecture | Granite Ridge (2024−2025) | Strix Halo (2025) |
| PassMark | 54,530 | 55,025 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 33,003 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 3,401 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 19,756 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 9900X uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 uses FP11 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen 9 9900X versus 8000 on the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 — the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 supports 199.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 9 9900X supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 9 9900X) vs 4 (Ryzen AI Max+ 395). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 9 9900X) vs 16 (Ryzen AI Max+ 395) — the Ryzen 9 9900X offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A620,B650,X670,X870 (Ryzen 9 9900X) and FP11 (Ryzen AI Max+ 395).
| Feature | Ryzen 9 9900X | Ryzen AI Max+ 395 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | FP11 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | 8000+159900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB+209715100% | 128 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24+50% | 16 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 9 9900X) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen AI Max+ 395). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon 610M (Ryzen 9 9900X) and AMD Radeon 8060S (Ryzen AI Max+ 395) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Ryzen AI Max+ 395 rivals Core Ultra 9 285HX.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 9900X | Ryzen AI Max+ 395 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Radeon 610M | AMD Radeon 8060S |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 9 9900X launched at $499 MSRP, while the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 debuted at $0. On MSRP ($499 vs $0), the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is $499 cheaper.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 9900X | Ryzen AI Max+ 395 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 109.3 | — |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












