
Ryzen 9 9900X
Popular choices:

Xeon Platinum 8358
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 9 9900X
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 48 MB).
- ✅Costs $4,108 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $4,607 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 825.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 109.3 vs 11.8 PassMark/$ ($499 MSRP vs $4,607 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 250W, a 130W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Platinum 8358, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
Xeon Platinum 8358
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅166.7% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 9900X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (54,416 vs 54,530).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (48 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.8 vs 109.3 PassMark/$ ($4,607 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ❌108.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 120W.
Ryzen 9 9900X
2024Xeon Platinum 8358
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 48 MB).
- ✅Costs $4,108 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $4,607 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 825.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 109.3 vs 11.8 PassMark/$ ($499 MSRP vs $4,607 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 250W, a 130W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅166.7% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Platinum 8358, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 9900X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (54,416 vs 54,530).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (48 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.8 vs 109.3 PassMark/$ ($4,607 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ❌108.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 120W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 9900X better than Xeon Platinum 8358?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 9900X | Xeon Platinum 8358 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 287 FPS | 185 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 218 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 190 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 218 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 170 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 152 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 186 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 151 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 9900X | Xeon Platinum 8358 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 766 FPS | 416 FPS |
| medium | 624 FPS | 364 FPS |
| high | 465 FPS | 296 FPS |
| ultra | 392 FPS | 237 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 629 FPS | 356 FPS |
| medium | 531 FPS | 317 FPS |
| high | 410 FPS | 264 FPS |
| ultra | 319 FPS | 203 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 353 FPS | 221 FPS |
| medium | 301 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 265 FPS | 169 FPS |
| ultra | 223 FPS | 136 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 9 9900X | Xeon Platinum 8358 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 899 FPS | 984 FPS |
| medium | 711 FPS | 858 FPS |
| high | 618 FPS | 811 FPS |
| ultra | 526 FPS | 720 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 726 FPS | 787 FPS |
| medium | 577 FPS | 676 FPS |
| high | 492 FPS | 639 FPS |
| ultra | 418 FPS | 567 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 517 FPS | 504 FPS |
| medium | 432 FPS | 397 FPS |
| high | 388 FPS | 353 FPS |
| ultra | 322 FPS | 288 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 9 9900X | Xeon Platinum 8358 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1126 FPS | 911 FPS |
| medium | 989 FPS | 828 FPS |
| high | 862 FPS | 714 FPS |
| ultra | 766 FPS | 615 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 891 FPS | 712 FPS |
| medium | 774 FPS | 625 FPS |
| high | 677 FPS | 537 FPS |
| ultra | 580 FPS | 460 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 644 FPS | 514 FPS |
| medium | 569 FPS | 459 FPS |
| high | 502 FPS | 403 FPS |
| ultra | 433 FPS | 351 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 9900X and Xeon Platinum 8358


Ryzen 9 9900X
Ryzen 9 9900X
The Ryzen 9 9900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Granite Ridge (2024−2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.6 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 54,530 points. Launch price was $499.

Xeon Platinum 8358
Xeon Platinum 8358
The Xeon Platinum 8358 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2021-04-06. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 48 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 250 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 54,416 points. Launch price was $3,950.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 9 9900X packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8358 offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8358 has 20 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.6 GHz on the Ryzen 9 9900X versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8358 — a 48.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 9900X (base: 4.4 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Ryzen 9 9900X uses the Granite Ridge (2024−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8358 uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 9900X scores 54,530 against the Xeon Platinum 8358's 54,416 — a 0.2% lead for the Ryzen 9 9900X. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 9900X vs 48 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8358.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 9900X | Xeon Platinum 8358 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24 | 32 / 64+167% |
| Boost Clock | 5.6 GHz+65% | 3.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.4 GHz+69% | 2.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total)+33% | 48 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-60% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Granite Ridge (2024−2025) | Ice Lake-SP (2021) |
| PassMark | 54,530 | 54,416 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 33,003 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 3,401 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 19,756 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 9900X uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8358 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen 9 9900X versus 3200 on the Xeon Platinum 8358 — the Xeon Platinum 8358 supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8358 supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 256 GB — 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 9 9900X) vs 8 (Xeon Platinum 8358). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 9 9900X) vs 64 (Xeon Platinum 8358) — the Xeon Platinum 8358 offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A620,B650,X670,X870 (Ryzen 9 9900X) and C621A (Xeon Platinum 8358).
| Feature | Ryzen 9 9900X | Xeon Platinum 8358 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | LGA4189 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | 3200+63900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB+6553500% | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 64+167% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 9900X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 9 9900X) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8358). The Ryzen 9 9900X includes integrated graphics (Radeon 610M), while the Xeon Platinum 8358 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Xeon Platinum 8358 rivals EPYC 7543.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 9900X | Xeon Platinum 8358 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon 610M | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 9 9900X launched at $499 MSRP, while the Xeon Platinum 8358 debuted at $4607. On MSRP ($499 vs $4607), the Ryzen 9 9900X is $4108 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 9 9900X delivers 109.3 pts/$ vs 11.8 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8358 — making the Ryzen 9 9900X the 161% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 9900X | Xeon Platinum 8358 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499-89% | $4607 |
| Performance per Dollar | 109.3+826% | 11.8 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2021 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












