
Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS
2024Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 120W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7950X3D across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (15,930 vs 38,581).
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +16.0% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $699 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌166.7% higher power demand at 120W vs 45W.
Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS
2024Ryzen 9 7950X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 120W, a 75W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +16.0% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7950X3D across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (15,930 vs 38,581).
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $699 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌166.7% higher power demand at 120W vs 45W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 7950X3D better than Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 266 FPS | 291 FPS |
| medium | 240 FPS | 265 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 219 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 233 FPS | 275 FPS |
| medium | 190 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 157 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 156 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 190 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 156 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 107 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 487 FPS | 734 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 627 FPS |
| high | 349 FPS | 465 FPS |
| ultra | 310 FPS | 393 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 427 FPS | 602 FPS |
| medium | 374 FPS | 536 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 413 FPS |
| ultra | 273 FPS | 326 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 283 FPS | 338 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 305 FPS |
| high | 244 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 209 FPS | 229 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 727 FPS | 1025 FPS |
| medium | 727 FPS | 1122 FPS |
| high | 727 FPS | 1062 FPS |
| ultra | 649 FPS | 875 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 727 FPS | 936 FPS |
| medium | 636 FPS | 845 FPS |
| high | 547 FPS | 775 FPS |
| ultra | 463 FPS | 656 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 574 FPS |
| medium | 459 FPS | 498 FPS |
| high | 408 FPS | 447 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 378 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 727 FPS | 1082 FPS |
| medium | 727 FPS | 973 FPS |
| high | 727 FPS | 854 FPS |
| ultra | 727 FPS | 766 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 727 FPS | 853 FPS |
| medium | 727 FPS | 751 FPS |
| high | 716 FPS | 659 FPS |
| ultra | 631 FPS | 569 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 619 FPS | 623 FPS |
| medium | 553 FPS | 555 FPS |
| high | 496 FPS | 493 FPS |
| ultra | 434 FPS | 426 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS and Ryzen 9 7950X3D


Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS
Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS
The Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 29,088 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
The Ryzen 9 7950X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 62,323 points. Launch price was $699.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Ryzen 9 7950X3D has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS versus 5.7 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D — a 11.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D (base: 3.8 GHz vs 4.2 GHz). The Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS uses the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS scores 29,088 against the Ryzen 9 7950X3D's 62,323 — a 72.7% lead for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 15,930 vs 38,581 (83.1% advantage for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,332 vs 2,926, a 22.6% lead for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,037 vs 19,643 (56.1% advantage for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D). L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS vs 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 16 / 32+100% |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz | 5.7 GHz+12% |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz | 4.2 GHz+11% |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 128 MB (total)+700% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-20% | 5 nm, 6 nm |
| Architecture | Hawk Point (2024−2025) | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 29,088 | 62,323+114% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 15,930 | 38,581+142% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,332 | 2,926+25% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,037 | 19,643+78% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS uses the FP7 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. The Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS) vs 28 (Ryzen 9 7950X3D) — the Ryzen 9 7950X3D offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FP7,FP7r2,FP8 (Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS) and AMD X670E,AMD X670,AMD B650E,AMD B650 (Ryzen 9 7950X3D).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP7 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB+100% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 28+40% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SVM (Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS) vs true (Ryzen 9 7950X3D). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon 780M (Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS) and Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 9 7950X3D) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS targets Enterprise Performance Laptop. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS rivals Core i7-13700H; Ryzen 9 7950X3D rivals Core i9-13900K.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Radeon 780M | Radeon Graphics |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SVM | true |
| Target Use | Enterprise Performance Laptop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











