
Core Ultra 5 225H
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core Ultra 5 225H
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 20W instead of 45W, a 25W reduction.
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (14,526 vs 15,930).
Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS
2024Why buy it
- ✅+9.7% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 5 225H across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌125% higher power demand at 45W vs 20W.
Core Ultra 5 225H
2025Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 20W instead of 45W, a 25W reduction.
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅+9.7% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (14,526 vs 15,930).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 5 225H across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌125% higher power demand at 45W vs 20W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core Ultra 5 225H better than Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 225H | Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 262 FPS | 240 FPS |
| high | 218 FPS | 205 FPS |
| ultra | 187 FPS | 176 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 245 FPS | 233 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 190 FPS |
| high | 157 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 168 FPS | 158 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 104 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 88 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 225H | Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 685 FPS | 487 FPS |
| medium | 543 FPS | 405 FPS |
| high | 432 FPS | 349 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 310 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 566 FPS | 427 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 374 FPS |
| high | 385 FPS | 322 FPS |
| ultra | 327 FPS | 273 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 349 FPS | 283 FPS |
| medium | 293 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 267 FPS | 244 FPS |
| ultra | 233 FPS | 209 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 225H | Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 720 FPS | 727 FPS |
| medium | 720 FPS | 727 FPS |
| high | 720 FPS | 727 FPS |
| ultra | 653 FPS | 649 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 720 FPS | 727 FPS |
| medium | 720 FPS | 636 FPS |
| high | 624 FPS | 547 FPS |
| ultra | 537 FPS | 463 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 628 FPS | 530 FPS |
| medium | 519 FPS | 459 FPS |
| high | 458 FPS | 408 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 343 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 225H | Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 720 FPS | 727 FPS |
| medium | 720 FPS | 727 FPS |
| high | 720 FPS | 727 FPS |
| ultra | 720 FPS | 727 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 720 FPS | 727 FPS |
| medium | 720 FPS | 727 FPS |
| high | 677 FPS | 716 FPS |
| ultra | 579 FPS | 631 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 604 FPS | 619 FPS |
| medium | 538 FPS | 553 FPS |
| high | 486 FPS | 496 FPS |
| ultra | 423 FPS | 434 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 5 225H and Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS

Core Ultra 5 225H
Core Ultra 5 225H
The Core Ultra 5 225H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture. It features 14 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): 20 MB + 18 MB. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 28,802 points. Launch price was $385.


Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS
Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS
The Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 29,088 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 5 225H packs 14 cores / 14 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core Ultra 5 225H has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 225H versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS — a 4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS (base: 4.3 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 225H uses the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS uses Hawk Point (2024−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 225H scores 28,802 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS's 29,088 — a 1% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 14,526 vs 15,930 (9.2% advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,678 vs 2,332, a 13.8% lead for the Core Ultra 5 225H that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 12,337 vs 11,037 (11.1% advantage for the Core Ultra 5 225H). L3 cache: 18 MB on the Core Ultra 5 225H vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 225H | Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 14+75% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz | 5.1 GHz+4% |
| Base Clock | 4.3 GHz+13% | 3.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB+13% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | — | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm | 4 nm-20% |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake-H (2025) | Hawk Point (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 28,802 | 29,088 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 14,526 | 15,930+10% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,678+15% | 2,332 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 12,337+12% | 11,037 |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 5 225H uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6400 memory speed. The Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 28 (Core Ultra 5 225H) vs 20 (Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS) — the Core Ultra 5 225H offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: WM880,HM870 (Core Ultra 5 225H) and FP7,FP7r2,FP8 (Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS).
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 225H | Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA2049 | FP7 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400 | DDR5-5600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 256 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28+40% | 20 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 5 225H) vs AMD-V, SVM (Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS). Both include integrated graphics — Intel Arc 130T GPU (Core Ultra 5 225H) and Radeon 780M (Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 5 225H targets Professional Content Creation Laptop, Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS targets Enterprise Performance Laptop. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 5 225H rivals Ryzen 7 9800H; Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS rivals Core i7-13700H.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 225H | Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel Arc 130T GPU | Radeon 780M |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V, SVM |
| Target Use | Professional Content Creation Laptop | Enterprise Performance Laptop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












