PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7745

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.5% higher average FPS across 23 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $5,900 less on MSRP ($400 MSRP vs $6,300 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1444.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 87.1 vs 5.6 PassMark/$ ($400 MSRP vs $6,300 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 205W, a 140W reduction.
✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (34,827 vs 35,506).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-3265M, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.

Xeon W-3265M

2019

Why buy it

✅+1.9% higher PassMark.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅166.7% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 across 23 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 5.6 vs 87.1 PassMark/$ ($6,300 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
❌215.4% higher power demand at 205W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 moves to AM5 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7745

2023

Xeon W-3265M

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.5% higher average FPS across 23 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $5,900 less on MSRP ($400 MSRP vs $6,300 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1444.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 87.1 vs 5.6 PassMark/$ ($400 MSRP vs $6,300 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 205W, a 140W reduction.
✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.

Why buy it

✅+1.9% higher PassMark.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅166.7% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (34,827 vs 35,506).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-3265M, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 across 23 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 5.6 vs 87.1 PassMark/$ ($6,300 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
❌215.4% higher power demand at 205W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 moves to AM5 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 better than Xeon W-3265M?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon W-3265M makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-3265M is the better fit. You are getting 1.9% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 is $5,900 cheaper on MSRP at $400 MSRP versus $6,300 MSRP, and it gives you a 6.5% average FPS lead across 23 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Xeon W-3265M is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1.9% better PassMark. It is also 1444.9% better value on MSRP (87.1 vs 5.6 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2019) and a healthier platform with AM5 and DDR5 instead of LGA3647. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 Benchmark Check

Xeon W-3265M Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 PRO 7745	Xeon W-3265M
1080p
low	248 FPS	198 FPS
medium	231 FPS	162 FPS
high	200 FPS	132 FPS
ultra	172 FPS	106 FPS
1440p
low	218 FPS	159 FPS
medium	183 FPS	125 FPS
high	152 FPS	100 FPS
ultra	134 FPS	83 FPS
4K
low	152 FPS	87 FPS
medium	127 FPS	74 FPS
high	99 FPS	58 FPS
ultra	86 FPS	47 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 Open Xeon W-3265M

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 PRO 7745	Xeon W-3265M
1080p
low	616 FPS	535 FPS
medium	516 FPS	453 FPS
high	427 FPS	378 FPS
ultra	386 FPS	341 FPS
1440p
low	525 FPS	463 FPS
medium	461 FPS	403 FPS
high	387 FPS	341 FPS
ultra	331 FPS	295 FPS
4K
low	308 FPS	290 FPS
medium	276 FPS	253 FPS
high	259 FPS	232 FPS
ultra	228 FPS	204 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 Open Xeon W-3265M

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 7 PRO 7745	Xeon W-3265M
1080p
low	871 FPS	888 FPS
medium	871 FPS	888 FPS
high	871 FPS	880 FPS
ultra	871 FPS	795 FPS
1440p
low	871 FPS	819 FPS
medium	870 FPS	719 FPS
high	788 FPS	679 FPS
ultra	656 FPS	604 FPS
4K
low	581 FPS	525 FPS
medium	499 FPS	430 FPS
high	449 FPS	388 FPS
ultra	379 FPS	314 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 Open Xeon W-3265M

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 7 PRO 7745	Xeon W-3265M
1080p
low	871 FPS	888 FPS
medium	871 FPS	888 FPS
high	871 FPS	843 FPS
ultra	847 FPS	739 FPS
1440p
low	871 FPS	888 FPS
medium	871 FPS	765 FPS
high	765 FPS	675 FPS
ultra	646 FPS	581 FPS
4K
low	680 FPS	630 FPS
medium	599 FPS	549 FPS
high	530 FPS	492 FPS
ultra	437 FPS	426 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 Open Xeon W-3265M

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 and Xeon W-3265M

Ryzen 7 PRO 7745

The Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 34,827 points. Launch price was $499.

Xeon W-3265M

The Xeon W-3265M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 33 MB. L2 cache: 24 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 35,506 points. Launch price was $6,353.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon W-3265M offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon W-3265M has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 versus 4.6 GHz on the Xeon W-3265M — a 14.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 uses the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon W-3265M uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 scores 34,827 against the Xeon W-3265M's 35,506 — a 1.9% lead for the Xeon W-3265M. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 vs 33 MB on the Xeon W-3265M.

Feature	Ryzen 7 PRO 7745	Xeon W-3265M
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	24 / 48+200%
Boost Clock	5.3 GHz+15%	4.6 GHz
Base Clock	3.8 GHz+41%	2.7 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)	33 MB+3%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	24 MB+2300%
Process	5 nm-64%	14 nm
Architecture	Raphael (2023−2025)	Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark	34,827	35,506+2%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon W-3265M uses LGA3647 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5200 on the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 versus 2933 on the Xeon W-3265M — the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 supports 55.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-3265M supports up to 1024 of RAM compared to 128 — 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 PRO 7745) vs 6 (Xeon W-3265M). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 PRO 7745) vs 64 (Xeon W-3265M) — the Xeon W-3265M offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM5 (Ryzen 7 PRO 7745) and C620 (Xeon W-3265M).

Feature	Ryzen 7 PRO 7745	Xeon W-3265M
Socket	AM5	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	5200+77%	2933
Max RAM Capacity	128	1024+700%
RAM Channels	2	6+200%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	24	64+167%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V, IOMMU (Ryzen 7 PRO 7745) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon W-3265M). The Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics), while the Xeon W-3265M requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 rivals Core i7-13700; Xeon W-3265M rivals EPYC 7402.

Feature	Ryzen 7 PRO 7745	Xeon W-3265M
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	AMD Radeon Graphics	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V, IOMMU	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 launched at $400 MSRP, while the Xeon W-3265M debuted at $6300. On MSRP ($400 vs $6300), the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 is $5900 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 delivers 87.1 pts/$ vs 5.6 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3265M — making the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 the 175.7% better value option.