
EPYC 7601
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 PRO 7745
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 7601
2017Why buy it
- ✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌176.9% higher power demand at 180W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 moves to AM5 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 7 PRO 7745.
Ryzen 7 PRO 7745
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +89.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 180W, a 115W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics, while EPYC 7601 needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike EPYC 7601.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (34,827 vs 35,059).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7601, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $400 MSRP, while EPYC 7601 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
EPYC 7601
2017Ryzen 7 PRO 7745
2023Why buy it
- ✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +89.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 180W, a 115W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics, while EPYC 7601 needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike EPYC 7601.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌176.9% higher power demand at 180W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 moves to AM5 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 7 PRO 7745.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (34,827 vs 35,059).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7601, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $400 MSRP, while EPYC 7601 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 better than EPYC 7601?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 7601 | Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 248 FPS |
| medium | 165 FPS | 231 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 200 FPS |
| ultra | 105 FPS | 172 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 218 FPS |
| medium | 127 FPS | 183 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 152 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 127 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 86 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 7601 | Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 207 FPS | 616 FPS |
| medium | 188 FPS | 516 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 427 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 386 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 178 FPS | 525 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 461 FPS |
| high | 141 FPS | 387 FPS |
| ultra | 111 FPS | 331 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 112 FPS | 308 FPS |
| medium | 103 FPS | 276 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 259 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 228 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 7601 | Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 620 FPS | 871 FPS |
| medium | 518 FPS | 871 FPS |
| high | 466 FPS | 871 FPS |
| ultra | 399 FPS | 871 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 517 FPS | 871 FPS |
| medium | 432 FPS | 870 FPS |
| high | 378 FPS | 788 FPS |
| ultra | 325 FPS | 656 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 383 FPS | 581 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 499 FPS |
| high | 270 FPS | 449 FPS |
| ultra | 220 FPS | 379 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 7601 | Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 832 FPS | 871 FPS |
| medium | 759 FPS | 871 FPS |
| high | 652 FPS | 871 FPS |
| ultra | 565 FPS | 847 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 666 FPS | 871 FPS |
| medium | 584 FPS | 871 FPS |
| high | 500 FPS | 765 FPS |
| ultra | 422 FPS | 646 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 474 FPS | 680 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 599 FPS |
| high | 375 FPS | 530 FPS |
| ultra | 322 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7601 and Ryzen 7 PRO 7745

EPYC 7601
EPYC 7601
The EPYC 7601 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 35,059 points. Launch price was $4,200.


Ryzen 7 PRO 7745
Ryzen 7 PRO 7745
The Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 34,827 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7601 packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 7601 has 24 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the EPYC 7601 versus 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 — a 49.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The EPYC 7601 uses the Naples (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 uses Raphael (2023−2025) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7601 scores 35,059 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745's 34,827 — a 0.7% lead for the EPYC 7601. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7601 vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745.
| Feature | EPYC 7601 | Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64+300% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz | 5.3 GHz+66% |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz | 3.8 GHz+73% |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total)+100% | 32 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 5 nm-64% |
| Architecture | Naples (2017−2018) | Raphael (2023−2025) |
| PassMark | 35,059 | 34,827 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7601 uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 2666 on the EPYC 7601 versus 5200 on the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 — the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 supports 64.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7601 supports up to 2048 of RAM compared to 128 — 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7601) vs 2 (Ryzen 7 PRO 7745). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7601) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 PRO 7745) — the EPYC 7601 offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7601) and AM5 (Ryzen 7 PRO 7745).
| Feature | EPYC 7601 | Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | TR4 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | 2666 | 5200+95% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2048+1500% | 128 |
| RAM Channels | 8+300% | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+433% | 24 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SVM (EPYC 7601) vs AMD-V, IOMMU (Ryzen 7 PRO 7745). The Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics), while the EPYC 7601 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 7601 rivals Xeon Platinum 8180; Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 rivals Core i7-13700.
| Feature | EPYC 7601 | Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | None | AMD Radeon Graphics |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SVM | AMD-V, IOMMU |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












