
Ryzen 5 3600
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (17,685 vs 18,191).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U
2023Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (17,685 vs 18,191).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U better than Ryzen 5 3600?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 161 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 101 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 154 FPS | 148 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 84 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 46 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 236 FPS |
| medium | 404 FPS | 201 FPS |
| high | 332 FPS | 176 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 156 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 420 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 179 FPS |
| high | 303 FPS | 161 FPS |
| ultra | 263 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 297 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 127 FPS |
| high | 230 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 106 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 455 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 455 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 455 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 426 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 455 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 437 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 392 FPS |
| ultra | 432 FPS | 324 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 375 FPS |
| medium | 361 FPS | 316 FPS |
| high | 305 FPS | 278 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 219 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 455 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 455 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 455 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 455 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 455 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 455 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 455 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 455 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 455 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 453 FPS |
| high | 413 FPS | 402 FPS |
| ultra | 357 FPS | 345 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 3600 and Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U


Ryzen 5 3600
Ryzen 5 3600
The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.


Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U
Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U
The Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Barcelo-U Refresh (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 18,191 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 3600 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U — a 6.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U uses Barcelo-U Refresh (2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 3600 scores 17,685 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U's 18,191 — a 2.8% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600 vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz | 4.5 GHz+7% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+80% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+100% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (2019−2020) | Barcelo-U Refresh (2023) |
| PassMark | 17,685 | 18,191+3% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 9,500 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,295 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,898 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U uses FP6 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | FP6 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: Yes (Ryzen 5 3600) / not specified (Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | Yes | — |
| Target Use | Gaming/Budget Workstation | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












