
Ryzen 7 PRO 5845
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 6230
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 PRO 5845
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (26,054 vs 26,076).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6230, which brings 20 cores / 40 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $300 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6230 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon Gold 6230
2019Why buy it
- ✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 20 cores / 40 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 0.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 PRO 5845
2022Xeon Gold 6230
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 20 cores / 40 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 0.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (26,054 vs 26,076).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6230, which brings 20 cores / 40 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $300 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6230 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 better than Xeon Gold 6230?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 | Xeon Gold 6230 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 140 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 | Xeon Gold 6230 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 511 FPS | 212 FPS |
| medium | 431 FPS | 188 FPS |
| high | 336 FPS | 161 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 136 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 431 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 377 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 305 FPS | 143 FPS |
| ultra | 256 FPS | 120 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 267 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 236 FPS | 109 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 82 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 | Xeon Gold 6230 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 649 FPS | 652 FPS |
| medium | 529 FPS | 652 FPS |
| high | 480 FPS | 652 FPS |
| ultra | 411 FPS | 648 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 543 FPS | 652 FPS |
| medium | 449 FPS | 605 FPS |
| high | 409 FPS | 573 FPS |
| ultra | 350 FPS | 506 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 396 FPS | 455 FPS |
| medium | 320 FPS | 357 FPS |
| high | 289 FPS | 318 FPS |
| ultra | 227 FPS | 259 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 | Xeon Gold 6230 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 651 FPS | 652 FPS |
| medium | 651 FPS | 652 FPS |
| high | 651 FPS | 648 FPS |
| ultra | 641 FPS | 563 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 651 FPS | 652 FPS |
| medium | 651 FPS | 587 FPS |
| high | 593 FPS | 505 FPS |
| ultra | 511 FPS | 433 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 526 FPS | 462 FPS |
| medium | 473 FPS | 414 FPS |
| high | 426 FPS | 369 FPS |
| ultra | 371 FPS | 320 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 and Xeon Gold 6230


Ryzen 7 PRO 5845
Ryzen 7 PRO 5845
The Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 26,054 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon Gold 6230
Xeon Gold 6230
The Xeon Gold 6230 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 27.5 MB. L2 cache: 20 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 26,076 points. Launch price was $1,894.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6230 offers 20 cores / 40 threads — the Xeon Gold 6230 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6230 — a 16.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 uses the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6230 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 scores 26,054 against the Xeon Gold 6230's 26,076 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon Gold 6230. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 vs 27.5 MB on the Xeon Gold 6230.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 | Xeon Gold 6230 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 20 / 40+150% |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+18% | 3.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+62% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+16% | 27.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 20 MB+3900% |
| Process | 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (2020−2025) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 26,054 | 26,076 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 22,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,419 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 14,529 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6230 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 | Xeon Gold 6230 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 1024 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 6 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 48 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 7 PRO 5845) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon Gold 6230). Primary use case: Xeon Gold 6230 targets Server / Multi-thread computing. Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 6230 rivals EPYC 7352.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 | Xeon Gold 6230 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | — | Server / Multi-thread computing |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












