Core Ultra 7 165H vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5845

Intel

Core Ultra 7 165H

16 Cores22 Thrd0 WWMax: 5 GHz2023

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen 7 PRO 5845

8 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2022

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core Ultra 7 165H

2023

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +33.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Newer platform on FCBGA2049 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (25,849 vs 26,054).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 32 MB).

Ryzen 7 PRO 5845

2022

Why buy it

  • +0.8% higher PassMark.
  • +33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 7 165H across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Launch MSRP is still $300 MSRP, while Core Ultra 7 165H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 7 165H moves to FCBGA2049 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 better than Core Ultra 7 165H?
It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Core Ultra 7 165H is ahead with a 33.1% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 pulls ahead with 0.8% better PassMark. Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 also has the bigger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 is the better fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 is at an unclear MSRP at $300 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you 0.8% better PassMark. The trade-off is that Core Ultra 7 165H is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 33.1% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (86.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core Ultra 7 165H is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022) and a healthier platform with FCBGA2049 and DDR5 instead of AM4. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore Ultra 7 165HRyzen 7 PRO 5845
1080p
low308 FPS159 FPS
medium278 FPS131 FPS
high232 FPS115 FPS
ultra198 FPS95 FPS
1440p
low251 FPS140 FPS
medium201 FPS113 FPS
high163 FPS95 FPS
ultra143 FPS79 FPS
4K
low173 FPS78 FPS
medium139 FPS68 FPS
high107 FPS55 FPS
ultra93 FPS44 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore Ultra 7 165HRyzen 7 PRO 5845
1080p
low646 FPS511 FPS
medium585 FPS431 FPS
high478 FPS336 FPS
ultra430 FPS295 FPS
1440p
low632 FPS431 FPS
medium530 FPS377 FPS
high437 FPS305 FPS
ultra371 FPS256 FPS
4K
low375 FPS267 FPS
medium320 FPS236 FPS
high295 FPS208 FPS
ultra258 FPS179 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore Ultra 7 165HRyzen 7 PRO 5845
1080p
low646 FPS649 FPS
medium646 FPS529 FPS
high646 FPS480 FPS
ultra646 FPS411 FPS
1440p
low646 FPS543 FPS
medium646 FPS449 FPS
high631 FPS409 FPS
ultra543 FPS350 FPS
4K
low641 FPS396 FPS
medium531 FPS320 FPS
high475 FPS289 FPS
ultra402 FPS227 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore Ultra 7 165HRyzen 7 PRO 5845
1080p
low646 FPS651 FPS
medium646 FPS651 FPS
high646 FPS651 FPS
ultra646 FPS641 FPS
1440p
low646 FPS651 FPS
medium646 FPS651 FPS
high646 FPS593 FPS
ultra579 FPS511 FPS
4K
low606 FPS526 FPS
medium538 FPS473 FPS
high486 FPS426 FPS
ultra423 FPS371 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 7 165H and Ryzen 7 PRO 5845

Intel

Core Ultra 7 165H

The Core Ultra 7 165H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Meteor Lake-H (2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 22 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): + 24 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 25,849 points. Launch price was $460.

AMD

Ryzen 7 PRO 5845

The Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 26,054 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 7 165H packs 16 cores / 22 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core Ultra 7 165H has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 165H versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 — a 8.3% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 165H (base: 3.8 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 165H uses the Meteor Lake-H (2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 uses Vermeer (2020−2025) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 165H scores 25,849 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845's 26,054 — a 0.8% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 165H vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845.

FeatureCore Ultra 7 165HRyzen 7 PRO 5845
Cores / Threads
16 / 22+100%
8 / 16
Boost Clock
5 GHz+9%
4.6 GHz
Base Clock
3.8 GHz+12%
3.4 GHz
L3 Cache
24 MB (total)
32 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache
2 MB (per core)+300%
512 kB (per core)
Process
7 nm
7 nm
Architecture
Meteor Lake-H (2023)
Vermeer (2020−2025)
PassMark
25,849
26,054
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 7 165H uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore Ultra 7 165HRyzen 7 PRO 5845
Socket
FCBGA2049
AM4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0