
Core Ultra 7 165H
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 PRO 5845
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core Ultra 7 165H
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +33.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA2049 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (25,849 vs 26,054).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 32 MB).
Ryzen 7 PRO 5845
2022Why buy it
- ✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 7 165H across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $300 MSRP, while Core Ultra 7 165H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 7 165H moves to FCBGA2049 and DDR5.
Core Ultra 7 165H
2023Ryzen 7 PRO 5845
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +33.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA2049 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (25,849 vs 26,054).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 32 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 7 165H across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $300 MSRP, while Core Ultra 7 165H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 7 165H moves to FCBGA2049 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 better than Core Ultra 7 165H?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 7 165H | Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 308 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 278 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 232 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 198 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 251 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 201 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 163 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 173 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 139 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 107 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 44 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 7 165H | Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 646 FPS | 511 FPS |
| medium | 585 FPS | 431 FPS |
| high | 478 FPS | 336 FPS |
| ultra | 430 FPS | 295 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 632 FPS | 431 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 377 FPS |
| high | 437 FPS | 305 FPS |
| ultra | 371 FPS | 256 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 375 FPS | 267 FPS |
| medium | 320 FPS | 236 FPS |
| high | 295 FPS | 208 FPS |
| ultra | 258 FPS | 179 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core Ultra 7 165H | Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 646 FPS | 649 FPS |
| medium | 646 FPS | 529 FPS |
| high | 646 FPS | 480 FPS |
| ultra | 646 FPS | 411 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 646 FPS | 543 FPS |
| medium | 646 FPS | 449 FPS |
| high | 631 FPS | 409 FPS |
| ultra | 543 FPS | 350 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 641 FPS | 396 FPS |
| medium | 531 FPS | 320 FPS |
| high | 475 FPS | 289 FPS |
| ultra | 402 FPS | 227 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core Ultra 7 165H | Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 646 FPS | 651 FPS |
| medium | 646 FPS | 651 FPS |
| high | 646 FPS | 651 FPS |
| ultra | 646 FPS | 641 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 646 FPS | 651 FPS |
| medium | 646 FPS | 651 FPS |
| high | 646 FPS | 593 FPS |
| ultra | 579 FPS | 511 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 606 FPS | 526 FPS |
| medium | 538 FPS | 473 FPS |
| high | 486 FPS | 426 FPS |
| ultra | 423 FPS | 371 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 7 165H and Ryzen 7 PRO 5845

Core Ultra 7 165H
Core Ultra 7 165H
The Core Ultra 7 165H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Meteor Lake-H (2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 22 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): + 24 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 25,849 points. Launch price was $460.


Ryzen 7 PRO 5845
Ryzen 7 PRO 5845
The Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 26,054 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 7 165H packs 16 cores / 22 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core Ultra 7 165H has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 165H versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 — a 8.3% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 165H (base: 3.8 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 165H uses the Meteor Lake-H (2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 uses Vermeer (2020−2025) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 165H scores 25,849 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845's 26,054 — a 0.8% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 165H vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 165H | Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 22+100% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+9% | 4.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+12% | 3.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total) | 32 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+300% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Meteor Lake-H (2023) | Vermeer (2020−2025) |
| PassMark | 25,849 | 26,054 |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 7 165H uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 165H | Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA2049 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












