
Core Ultra 7 165H
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 7645HX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core Ultra 7 165H
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (25,849 vs 26,097).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 7645HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 5 7645HX
2023Why buy it
- ✅+1% higher PassMark.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 610M, while Core Ultra 7 165H needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 7 165H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Core Ultra 7 165H
2023Ryzen 5 7645HX
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Why buy it
- ✅+1% higher PassMark.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 610M, while Core Ultra 7 165H needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (25,849 vs 26,097).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 7645HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 7 165H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 7645HX better than Core Ultra 7 165H?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 7 165H | Ryzen 5 7645HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 308 FPS | 272 FPS |
| medium | 278 FPS | 249 FPS |
| high | 232 FPS | 212 FPS |
| ultra | 198 FPS | 182 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 251 FPS | 229 FPS |
| medium | 201 FPS | 190 FPS |
| high | 163 FPS | 155 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 137 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 173 FPS | 160 FPS |
| medium | 139 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 107 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 89 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 7 165H | Ryzen 5 7645HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 646 FPS | 638 FPS |
| medium | 585 FPS | 515 FPS |
| high | 478 FPS | 430 FPS |
| ultra | 430 FPS | 385 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 632 FPS | 546 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 459 FPS |
| high | 437 FPS | 390 FPS |
| ultra | 371 FPS | 335 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 375 FPS | 347 FPS |
| medium | 320 FPS | 294 FPS |
| high | 295 FPS | 273 FPS |
| ultra | 258 FPS | 236 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core Ultra 7 165H | Ryzen 5 7645HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 646 FPS | 652 FPS |
| medium | 646 FPS | 652 FPS |
| high | 646 FPS | 652 FPS |
| ultra | 646 FPS | 590 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 646 FPS | 652 FPS |
| medium | 646 FPS | 598 FPS |
| high | 631 FPS | 515 FPS |
| ultra | 543 FPS | 442 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 641 FPS | 513 FPS |
| medium | 531 FPS | 433 FPS |
| high | 475 FPS | 374 FPS |
| ultra | 402 FPS | 306 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core Ultra 7 165H | Ryzen 5 7645HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 646 FPS | 652 FPS |
| medium | 646 FPS | 652 FPS |
| high | 646 FPS | 652 FPS |
| ultra | 646 FPS | 652 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 646 FPS | 652 FPS |
| medium | 646 FPS | 652 FPS |
| high | 646 FPS | 652 FPS |
| ultra | 579 FPS | 570 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 606 FPS | 586 FPS |
| medium | 538 FPS | 525 FPS |
| high | 486 FPS | 474 FPS |
| ultra | 423 FPS | 405 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 7 165H and Ryzen 5 7645HX

Core Ultra 7 165H
Core Ultra 7 165H
The Core Ultra 7 165H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Meteor Lake-H (2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 22 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): + 24 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 25,849 points. Launch price was $460.


Ryzen 5 7645HX
Ryzen 5 7645HX
The Ryzen 5 7645HX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Dragon Range (Zen4) (2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FL1. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 26,097 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 7 165H packs 16 cores / 22 threads, while the Ryzen 5 7645HX offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core Ultra 7 165H has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 165H versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7645HX — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.8 GHz vs 4 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 165H uses the Meteor Lake-H (2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen 5 7645HX uses Dragon Range (Zen4) (2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 165H scores 25,849 against the Ryzen 5 7645HX's 26,097 — a 1% lead for the Ryzen 5 7645HX. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 165H vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7645HX.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 165H | Ryzen 5 7645HX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 22+167% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz | 5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz | 4 GHz+5% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total) | 32 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm | 5 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Meteor Lake-H (2023) | Dragon Range (Zen4) (2023) |
| PassMark | 25,849 | 26,097 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 13,985 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,588 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 11,717 |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 7 165H uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 7645HX uses FL1 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 165H | Ryzen 5 7645HX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA2049 | FL1 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | No |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 28 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core Ultra 7 165H) / AMD-V (SVM) (Ryzen 5 7645HX). The Ryzen 5 7645HX includes integrated graphics (Radeon 610M), while the Core Ultra 7 165H requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 7645HX targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 7645HX rivals Core i5-13500HX.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 165H | Ryzen 5 7645HX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon 610M |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V (SVM) |
| Target Use | — | Gaming |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












