
Ryzen 7 PRO 5845
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 6226R
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 PRO 5845
2022Why buy it
- ✅+45.5% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 22 MB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 150W, a 85W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6226R across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (26,054 vs 26,278).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6226R, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $300 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6226R mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon Gold 6226R
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (22 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌130.8% higher power demand at 150W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 PRO 5845
2022Xeon Gold 6226R
2020Why buy it
- ✅+45.5% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 22 MB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 150W, a 85W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6226R across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (26,054 vs 26,278).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6226R, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $300 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6226R mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (22 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌130.8% higher power demand at 150W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Gold 6226R better than Ryzen 7 PRO 5845?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 | Xeon Gold 6226R |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 184 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 140 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 | Xeon Gold 6226R |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 511 FPS | 400 FPS |
| medium | 431 FPS | 346 FPS |
| high | 336 FPS | 288 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 242 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 431 FPS | 346 FPS |
| medium | 377 FPS | 307 FPS |
| high | 305 FPS | 256 FPS |
| ultra | 256 FPS | 213 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 267 FPS | 224 FPS |
| medium | 236 FPS | 199 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 146 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 | Xeon Gold 6226R |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 649 FPS | 657 FPS |
| medium | 529 FPS | 657 FPS |
| high | 480 FPS | 657 FPS |
| ultra | 411 FPS | 656 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 543 FPS | 657 FPS |
| medium | 449 FPS | 612 FPS |
| high | 409 FPS | 580 FPS |
| ultra | 350 FPS | 512 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 396 FPS | 462 FPS |
| medium | 320 FPS | 361 FPS |
| high | 289 FPS | 322 FPS |
| ultra | 227 FPS | 261 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 | Xeon Gold 6226R |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 651 FPS | 657 FPS |
| medium | 651 FPS | 657 FPS |
| high | 651 FPS | 657 FPS |
| ultra | 641 FPS | 576 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 651 FPS | 657 FPS |
| medium | 651 FPS | 599 FPS |
| high | 593 FPS | 517 FPS |
| ultra | 511 FPS | 444 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 526 FPS | 469 FPS |
| medium | 473 FPS | 422 FPS |
| high | 426 FPS | 377 FPS |
| ultra | 371 FPS | 328 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 and Xeon Gold 6226R


Ryzen 7 PRO 5845
Ryzen 7 PRO 5845
The Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 26,054 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon Gold 6226R
Xeon Gold 6226R
The Xeon Gold 6226R is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 26,278 points. Launch price was $1,300.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6226R offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon Gold 6226R has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6226R — a 16.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 uses the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6226R uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 scores 26,054 against the Xeon Gold 6226R's 26,278 — a 0.9% lead for the Xeon Gold 6226R. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 vs 22 MB on the Xeon Gold 6226R.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 | Xeon Gold 6226R |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 16 / 32+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+18% | 3.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+17% | 2.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+45% | 22 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 16 MB+3100% |
| Process | 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (2020−2025) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 26,054 | 26,278 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6226R uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 | Xeon Gold 6226R |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












